batman vs batman

Originally posted by spidey-dude
il download the movie to find which part it was.

So basically the only argument is "Teh DAWGZ!" which is a lame argument to begin with.

Give the thread to Bale.

Originally posted by Ha-Son
No. Here's what you should do. Quit being cheap, go to the movie theater and watch the real version. Because half of the claims you made did not occur. 😐

Originally posted by jrodslam
Bales fighting skills? Where was this shown? Like i stated before, he didnt show to have any type of martial arts skills when guised as Batman. The only time he ever showed any amount of ma skill was in Begins when he was training. Dogs are vicious yes, but easier to take down than a brute. A Keaton fact that supports him winning is A. Being more durable. B. Actually showing ma skill as Batman. C. Having faster reflexes. D. Doing what it takes to get the win by almost any means. How does Bales Batman win?

Yes he did dude. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you've taken some martial arts before. I have taken Muay Thai, Judo, and Brazilian Jiu Jitsu (at one time or another, not all at once, obviously).

That bullshit Keaton did was just theatrical hollywood "martial arts." Bale Batman was doing "some" real martial arts. He was using quick jabs and a lot of elbows. Anyone who takes serious martial arts knows that elbows are an extremely proficient way of knocking out one's opponent; faster than a punch if you are really good at it. bale batman doesn't kick that much. This is in-line with real world martial arts as kicking expends one's energy a lot more than punching/elbowing, and we all know how many goons bale batman has to stomp out.

And how do you know that rottweilers are easier to take down than "brutes?" Have you ever tried wrestling with either one? I haven't, but to just say "large dogs are easier to deal with than big dudes"....Come on man...debate intelligently.

keaton wins

This threads a joke and the poll proves that with an overwhelming vote for the obvious,Bale.Keatons Batman was a wuss.He couldnt even beat ONE guy.a guy with no special fighting skills-the jokers goon,beat the crap out of keatons Batman.Bales Batman was like the TRUE dark knight,able to wipe the floor with dozens of goons at one time.Bales batman would take out Keatons Batman within seconds.Better thread would be Bales Batman against Kilmers Batman.Kilmers Batman also showed the martial arts skills that Batman has.

Originally posted by emporerpants
you guys seriously think keaton batman is a better fighter? did you forget the part where he gets his ass handed to him by a random joker thug in the bell tower?

exactly,apparently they did. 🙄

oh, it gets better than that, keep reading the thread, you'll see some unbelievable crap, like jrod trying to say that keaton LET the thug beat his ass. classic. haha.

yeah I saw that.that is some hilarious shit there. 😆 😆 😄 😆 It amazes me the extremes the apologists will go to to defend the horrible shortcomings of The Burton Batman films. 😆 Its also hilarious how a few of them are saying getting bit by 3 huge dogs makes him pawned.yeah right.Like someone said,Bale threw those dogs against the wall.thats hardly getting owned or whatever.

Originally posted by grimify
So he decided to purposely let some guy beat him down? That really doesn't make any sense, and sounds like a bad excuse.

From what I remember, Keaton didn't go on the offensive because he couldn't. The guy mauled him and knocked him over the ledge. Then Keaton simply surprised him after the fight was "over".

Now granted it's been a while since I watched Batman 89. I'll look for the vhs if I get bored enough.

yeah thats desperately grasping at straws saying that Keaton let him beat him down.thats a HORRIBLE and lame excuse. 😆 He got the crap beat out of pure and simple.Like you said,he mauled him and was just unlucky enough to get him over into the bell tower which was just sheer luck for Batman,nothing else. 🙄 Like you said,thinking the fight was over,Batman being lucky like he was to catch his breath and regroup out of sheer LUCK,surprised him and tossed him down the bell tower.

Originally posted by nimbus006
Read Batman.

Killing someone has nothing to do with courage.

Courage, in Batman's case, is having the will to ensure justice (not killing Joker) in the face of temptation (letting him die).

I know.this spidey dude guy is hysterical and just keeps making more and more ignorant posts one after the other. 😆 Obviously he never read Batman cause if he DID,he would know that Batman HATES to kill people.Yeah thats WHO Batman is.Burtons Batman movies disgraced the comics having him kill the joker,then the penguin.Like you said,not giving in to temptation to kill the joker and letting him die,now THATS courage.For Batman to kill people in the cowardly ways he did in the Burton Batman movies,it goes against everything on who Batman is.Your post was ignored by him so it just goes through one ear and out the other with this guy so its just a waste of time trying to explain it to him that the Burton Batman movies digraced his character and the comics. Even in the early days when Batman carried a gun and shot and killed people,he only did so when it was absolutely neccessary and there was no other way out for him and as a last resort.sheesh this guy obviously never read a batman comic.

indeed

Originally posted by Mr Parker
I know.this spidey dude guy is hysterical and just keeps making more and more ignorant posts one after the other. 😆 Obviously he never read Batman cause if he DID,he would know that Batman HATES to kill people.Yeah thats WHO Batman is.Burtons Batman movies disgraced the comics having him kill the joker,then the penguin.Like you said,not giving in to temptation to kill the joker and letting him die,now THATS courage.For Batman to kill people in the cowardly ways he did in the Burton Batman movies,it goes against everything on who Batman is.Your post was ignored by him so it just goes through one ear and out the other with this guy so its just a waste of time trying to explain it to him that the Burton Batman movies digraced his character and the comics. Even in the early days when Batman carried a gun and shot and killed people,he only did so when it was absolutely neccessary and there was no other way out for him and as a last resort.sheesh this guy obviously never read a batman comic.

hey there liar, how are you doing? watch that scene you made up from the dark knight again yet?

Originally posted by emporerpants
hey there liar, how are you doing? watch that scene you made up from the dark knight again yet?

sure. i'm not the one who made up a scene that didn't happen there pal. by the way, did you find that scene yet? thats right, you didn't, because you made it up.

It shouldn't be hard admitting you made up a scene to help an argument but it backfired. Bale's Batman wins in a stomp, just admit it and get over it. Stop making up shit.

Originally posted by emporerpants
sure. i'm not the one who made up a scene that didn't happen there pal. by the way, did you find that scene yet? thats right, you didn't, because you made it up.

sure you do. you're the only one that remembers it then. you know why you're the only one? because you're making it up. no one believes you, stop lying.

Originally posted by emporerpants
sure you do. you're the only one that remembers it then. you know why you're the only one? because you're making it up. no one believes you, stop lying.