Off Topic Circle Jerk

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
To me when I make a thread I never really consider time a factor. It doesn't matter to me if a match starts at night or during the day. As for handicaps, if you handicap one person/team then the other should also be handicapped to make for a fair match. In most matches the time of a match really isn't a factor whether or not a person/team wins or loses., Unless its stated by the thread starter that so and so has a certain amount of time to win or lose then I can see time being a factor.

What about if the handicap were to make a character more comparable to another for the purposes of making the match more fair?

Gauntlets seem to be pretty popular, there's always a few active around my forum.

I have to agree with that.

Originally posted by Peach
What about if the handicap were to make a character more comparable to another for the purposes of making the match more fair?

Gauntlets seem to be pretty popular, there's always a few active around my forum.

I see no problems with that as long as the thread starter specifies it. . It should make for more good matches

Idea for a new MVF Amendment:

Gauntlet matches and Army fights.

Does this sound like a good idea?

👆 and 👆

You don't think that this has potential for a cluster f*ck?

Oh hell yeah it does haermm

No...

They both work fine in the other vs. forums.

Originally posted by Impediment
Idea for a new MVF Amendment:

Gauntlet matches and Army fights.

Does this sound like a good idea?

It's a good idea.

Originally posted by Impediment
Idea for a new MVF Amendment:

Gauntlet matches and Army fights.

Does this sound like a good idea?

Fine by me.

Lemme know if I can moll over another rule.

Updated Rule #4 in the Rules Thread to include Army/Group matches.

facepalm

(me talking to myself)

Why do I have to be so lenient sometimes? I wish, sometimes, I was as strict as Ushgarak and could just do what needs to be done.

Originally posted by Impediment
facepalm

(me talking to myself)

Why do I have to be so lenient sometimes? I wish, sometimes, I was as strict as Ushgarak and could just do what needs to be done.

Naaaaaah. You're doing fine. However, after Placidty's last post, I would have banned him for 3 days. That was a bit over the line after you gave out a non-warning warning.

I think it's fun to throw insults at each other until it gets too serious. Mature adults usually know where to draw the line on the insulting.

Besides, spiderman is awesome and can hold his own against most in the fantasy world...but not a good Jedi or Sith. 😄 Placidty knows that. He's frustrated for other reasons. I've disagreed with RJ in the past and it probably went on for pages...however, it never ended up like this...so they're doin' it wrong, man!

What movie is that from? "You're doing it wrong?"

So what is the deal with the Spider-Man/Jedi Order thread? I apologize for my lack of presence as of late, but work has been kicking my ass.

What seems to be the problem? I have gotten a few PMs today.

It seems to have gone down like this...

Dadudamon was citing a lot of feats from the EU material including the CW cartoon. (The original one) while decrying stuff we saw on screen. RJ asserted that Anakin landed the Half a ship with the force in ROTS, but beyond that has been pro-canon.

That leads onto argument 2.

This was regards to the clash between the canons of the CW movie and all existing canon before (Anakin having an apprentice himself pre jedi master status, Grevious clearly having his movie appearance already, as opposed to the original CW cartoon, where he walks hunched and coughs becuse Mace force crushed him at the battle of coruscant in the cartoon. etc)

(Despite canon being that Jedi dont use their powers for attack anyway.)

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
It seems to have gone down like this...

Dadudamon was citing a lot of feats from the EU material including the CW cartoon. (The original one) while decrying stuff we saw on screen. RJ asserted that Anakin landed the Half a ship with the force in ROTS, but beyond that has been pro-canon.

That leads onto argument 2.

This was regards to the clash between the canons of the CW movie and all existing canon before (Anakin having an apprentice himself pre jedi master status, Grevious clearly having his movie appearance already, as opposed to the original CW cartoon, where he walks hunched and coughs becuse Mace force crushed him at the battle of coruscant in the cartoon. etc)

(Despite canon being that Jedi dont use their powers for attack anyway.)

And we see Jedi use their powers for attack time and time again.

So Yoda just pulled that out of his ass..?

Yodas teachings to Luke were probably revised by 21 years of sitting around in a swamp thinking "Oooopsss. Beat, my ass got last time I went on the attack."

It really depends on what your definition of "defense" is.