Off Topic Circle Jerk

Started by focus4chumps1,317 pages
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Semantics btw means significant, apparently you didn't know, FYI.

wow man 😂

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Semantics btw means significant, apparently you didn't know, FYI.

Here you go: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semantics

Please go and have your juice already.

To sum it up

Robtard "Quan reported Anti Quan!"

Quan "No I didn't"

Bada the mod "No he didn't"

Robtard "Yes he did, I don't care!! I have no proof, even if you do! He still did!"

Robtard Fail

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
To sum it up

Robtard "Quan reported Anti Quan!"

Quan "No I didn't"

Bada the mod "No he didn't"

Robtard "Yes he did, I don't care!! I have no proof, even if you do! He still did!"

Robtard Fail

Robtard, this dude is right. Badabing already confirmed Quan isn't reporting people.

If you're just trolling TE, touché.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
To sum it up

Robtard "Quan reported Anti Quan!"

Quan "No I didn't"

Bada the mod "No he didn't"

Robtard "Yes he did, I don't care!! I have no proof, even if you do! He still did!"

Robtard Fail

False. I've not discussed Quanchi's squealing antics with Bada in here. So stop lying already.

I also have proof. Page 457

Originally posted by dadudemon
Robtard, this dude is right. Badabing already confirmed Quan isn't reporting people.

If you're just trolling TE, touché.

TE is not correct. Look at his 'semantics' claim.

Originally posted by Robtard
False. I've not discussed Quanchi's squealing antics with Bada in here. So stop lying already.

I also have proof. Page 457

Wrong Bada said he didn't, keep lying.

Guys, Quan really didn't report any posts that I saw. He also doesn't PM me about posts. Let's face it, if he did he'd be incriminating himself too. I also wouldn't act on any reports because this is Impediment's forum, unless it was blatant socking or posting porn.

RJ's sock account was reported by another person on another forum. I banned the account because it was a blatant sock account and RJ wasn't even trying to hide it. That's an auto-ban if I come across it.

I happen to come across things because this thread is like a multi-car accident. I just can't help myself and have to check out what kind of carnage is happening.

Originally posted by Robtard
TE is not correct. Look at his 'semantics' claim.

Look up the word Robtard
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Wrong Bada said he didn't, keep lying.

Not wrong. I've not discussed it with Bada. You're just making things up again cos you've not had your juice. Go have your juice.

Seems your wrong Rob.

Originally posted by Badabing
Guys, Quan really didn't report any posts that I saw. He also doesn't PM me about posts. Let's face it, if he did he'd be incriminating himself too. I also wouldn't act on any reports because this is Impediment's forum, unless it was blatant socking or posting porn.

RJ's sock account was reported by another person on another forum. I banned the account because it was a blatant sock account and RJ wasn't even trying to hide it. That's an auto-ban if I come across it.

I happen to come across things because this thread is like a multi-car accident. I just can't help myself and have to check out what kind of carnage is happening.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Look up the word Robtard
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics

Originally posted by Robtard
Here you go: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semantics

Please go and have your juice already.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Seems your wrong Rob.

"you're"

And no.

WTF? Bada just confirmed it, Robtard. Move on.

Originally posted by Badabing
Guys, Quan really didn't report any posts that I saw. He also doesn't PM me about posts. Let's face it, if he did he'd be incriminating himself too. I also wouldn't act on any reports because this is Impediment's forum, unless it was blatant socking or posting porn.

RJ's sock account was reported by another person on another forum. I banned the account because it was a blatant sock account and RJ wasn't even trying to hide it. That's an auto-ban if I come across it.

I happen to come across things because this thread is like a multi-car accident. I just can't help myself and have to check out what kind of carnage is happening.

Seems you wrong again Robtard.

Originally posted by dadudemon
WTF? Bada just confirmed it, Robtard. Move on.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Seems you wrong again Robtard.

"you're"

'Again' implies I was wrong before; I wasn't.

Originally posted by dadudemon
WTF? Bada just confirmed it, Robtard. Move on.

He is now stuck in a hard troll moment.

Originally posted by Robtard
We'll just have to agree to disagree.

No really Bada said you in fact are wrong. Just accept the loss.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
He is now stuck in a hard troll moment.

wow! not a single grammatical/spelling error. it's a shame you didn't use this particular post to peddle your grammar nazism. oh well.