Originally posted by NaiYou backed down and tried to debate at the same time. Unlike you I take my matchups to judged battlezones. You're gutless and warrant no respect.
I don't care, which is obvious due to me not entering a real debate with you. I declined, because it doesn't make any sense, as 17 pages of having your ass handed to you without moving a micrometer into the direction of accepting you are wrong, proves rather nicely. And a troll quoting another troll is cute, but doesn't mean much in the realm of "truth".I still wouldn't accept for pretty much the same reason I declined in the first place. Arguing with you makes no sense, especially not about an issue, where I have a better grasp on both sides than yourself. Not, that this is any kind of feat, given your general lack of virtually every quality needed for debating.
Originally posted by Bardock42Yes. But he isn't. Robbie is a known liar.
If he is your sock wouldn't you be banned either way?
Originally posted by The RenegadeI am the lion surrounded by gazelles.
Khanchi, you're the one person that should know what you are but does not. You see yourself as a Lion roaring with pride as all of the other Lions walk away in defeat but, in reality, they're actually walking away because it's just a half-eaten baby Gazelle having a seizure before it dies, confused about what it really is.
Originally posted by RobtardHere comes the rage loop.
You're a ridiculous person, Quan.
While "Concession Accepted" is annoying as ****, there are times when the behavior of certain posters pretty much calls for a "Concession Accepted" type response. For example, I once saw a conversation play out like this.Poster A: Well, for scary and all-too realistic nasties, there was RandomJ's Littleboy. Hell, too many of KMC's members who work in fields related to microbiology said it was scary as **** due to how much of it was feasible for even today's tech to make if someone really wanted to try and make something akin to it.
Poster B: What you just said is bullshit.
Poster A: Alright, here's the contents. *long post filled with the technical contents of RandomJ's Littleboy* Can you point out where exactly the bullshit is?
Poster B: All of it.
Poster A: ...that didn't point out anything of value or note though. Can you back up your claim, or will you **** off already?
Poster B: No, because it's all bullshit.
Poster A: So you claim it's bullshit, refuse to back up your statements, have someone put up the actual contents so you can refute it, and you still refuse to refute it in good faith?
Poster B: Yes, because it's all bullshit.
Poster A: Alright then, concession accepted.
Mod: Have a ban.So yeah, when people are debating in bad faith, I do think "Concession Accepted" shouldn't be punishable, because the refusal by the other party to debate in good faith and to back up their shit when called out on it is by nature a concession on being unable to actually argue the statement or claim they're making.
This sounds familiar... And unfortunately, poster B reminds me of someone, his name starts with a "Q" and ends with "uanchi112"