Originally posted by Silent Master
Yep, DDM is trying to shift the burden of proof away from quan.
Quan has already provided all the proof he needs and he literally cannot provide any further prove because he is not an admin for KMC.
The burden of proof is on those that are choosing to contradict Quan's claim which I have proven is correct (that mod edits, if done in less than a KMC minute, will not show up on the post).
Get madder. Get more butthurt. All the whining you are doing won't change reality. 🙂
Originally posted by dadudemon
Quan has already provided all the proof he needs and he literally cannot provide any further prove because he is not an admin for KMC.The burden of proof is on those that are choosing to contradict Quan's claim which I have proven is correct (that mod edits, if done in less than a KMC minute, will not show up on the post).
Get madder. Get more butthurt. All the whining you are doing won't change reality. 🙂
The burden is on the person making the claim, that's quan.
Originally posted by Robtard
That means anyone can type anything (racist rants, pedo rants, vile insults etc) and then just hide under the "some Mod edited my post within the 1 min time limit" clause and it's okay.
And now you understand part of why I have had a problem, for years, with the edit cooldown thing. 🙂
This is not a new argument. I suspected another mod, 5+ years ago, of doing that to one of my posts.
Clearly, Quanchi's post was edited. Why are we all pretending it wasn't? There's no proof argument, really. We all know it was edited. It's just to troll Quan even more for his shenanigans.
Originally posted by dadudemon
And now you understand part of why I have had a problem, for years, with the edit cooldown thing. 🙂This is not a new argument. I suspected another mod, 5+ years ago, of doing that to one of my posts.
Clearly, Quanchi's post was edited. Why are we all pretending it wasn't? There's no proof argument, really. We all know it was edited. It's just to troll Quan even more for his shenanigans.
To be fair, Quanchi has claimed to not have edited post he was mocked over and it was well past the grace period; the post in question had the edit tags listed.
What I'm saying is, taking Quanchi at his word is dubious (not that you're wrong or right here). He does all manner of silly moves to try and get attention here.
Originally posted by Silent Master
It's simple, there is no proof that quan's post was edited, so case closed.
Originally posted by dadudemon
If you have anything new to add to this particular discussion, please, add it.Until then, you're a broken record and your posts on the topic will be ignored until you can submit something new. 👆
Originally posted by Robtard
To be fair, Quanchi has claimed to not have edited post he was mocked over and it was well past the grace period; the post in question had the edit tags listed.What I'm saying is, taking Quanchi at his word is dubious (not that you're wrong or right here). He does all manner of silly moves to try and get attention here.
I know which situation you're describing. I knew exactly what Quanchi was talking about. He was talking about a "further edit" above and away from the original one. He didn't make a second edit. But his ego was too huge to admit that because there is no way he could win the argument if he said, "Yes, I edited my post. But not to remove the error you claimed I made: it was a typo fix."
If Quanchi had admitted that, then people like Silent Farter would say, "AHA! No! It says edit! You have no proof it was the other thing!"
Originally posted by Silent Master
You just admitted that quan is willing to lie about his actions, so why should we believe him now?
Originally posted by dadudemon
3. I would chock it up to typical MvF posting style to deflect and ignore when people call you out in these versus debates. That's not something specific to Quan but, rather, a symptom of this cesspool. It doesn't fit well to make the case that Quan posted that stuff because Quan is neither humliated nor is this a "versus forum" argument. Other than the context of this point, I think you are correct.4. I have not seen him caught in very many lies. And the lies he was caught in could also be chocked up to him rooster-strutting rather than malicious lies (such as saying he won 5 Battle Zone debates when he won none). He is definitely not a pathological liar and he is guilty of hyperbole, at worst.
Try to troll me a bit better when my actual points are literally on the previous page. 🙂
so when does the water play begin?