Originally posted by Darkstorm ZeroI raped the shit out of those fools on that site. They often cited the books, ignored evidence, argued via hyperbole, and hid behind moderation, and the thread was closed.
After all the shit that got beaten out of him at Space Battles, I'm surprised that Quan has returned here spewing the same nonsense filled rantings he usually embodies...
Also you take this shit far too seriously. Chill out, loser.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I raped the shit out of those fools on that site. They often cited the books, ignored evidence, argued via hyperbole, and hid behind moderation, and the thread was closed.Also you take this shit far too seriously. Chill out, loser.
I suggest you re-read the thread Quan. You got axed from your own thread because you couldn't follow the sites rules, and the mods there are not lenient and don't tolerate it when it comes to burden of proof.
You cited no real evidence, you constantly ignore it yourself, and still used liberal hyperbole with no basis, meanwhile any hyperbole used by them was based at least in canon sources, the books. You even went as far as to name the Jackson movies as the definitive source.
How can a movie that is based on the original work be the definitive source? By it's very nature, the movies cannot be the definitive source if it is based on something else. You kept crying about movies only (as you normally do) but you should be able to understand by now, there are things that the movies could not cover, therefore one should ALWAYS be able to go back to the canon source material. Many books-to-movies/TV shows are like this, LOTR and the Hobbit are far from the only ones that need this. Game of Thrones/A Song of Ice and Fire is another example.
Originally posted by Robtard
Heh. Here, have a look for yourself
He got charblasted by SuperS4 in his own thread because he pointedly refused to provide evidence to back his claims, using his tried and true "I'm not Youtube hunting". Apparently he didn't read the site rules, which unlike here sometimes, are strickly enforced at SB. And it states:
#8. In Serious Debates, Standard Debating Practices and Etiquette are in Effect In debate, posters are expected to back up their claims with reasoning and fact. At the same time, demands for evidence that the staff judges to be insincere – that is, whose purpose is to derail a productive conversation or to harass other posters or staff, are themselves infractable. The nature of a debate is subjective, and staff are expected to use their own common sense to guide their judgment on the issue.