Off Topic Circle Jerk

Started by Darkstorm Zero1,317 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
Honestly, no desire to read that, as it seems Quanchi uses the same failed arguments and clown tactics in multiple message boards and I've read/seen them here already. What an odd hobby to have

Indeed, I came in after he already got banned from his own thread, and people were literally mocking him as the new clown prince of stupidity.

He will of course deny that he lost completely.... in fact, he already tried.

He is so used to the laid back mods from here and ICT putting up with his behavior that he forgets that other boards are comparatively strict.

What is ICT?

It stands for "it's clobbering time" ie the name of herochats vs forum.

http://herochat.com/index.php?board=6.0

I see, was thinking it was yet another website

I never visited Herochat myself. This place has all the Quan I can stand. When he showed up on SB, I was... for lack of a better term, disgusted.

Fortunately, he was forced to abandon SB very quickly.

Someone once made reference to him being as bad as Effect Veiler. I said Quan was worse, even though EV was pretty bad both here and on SB.

Originally posted by Robtard
I see, was thinking it was yet another website

Well, he did complain/brag back on the old ICT board that he's been perma-banned from several websites, but the only one whose name I can remember is CBR.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan mimicking me again:

Quan's my biggest fanboy 😍

Hush, nerd.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
I suggest you re-read the thread Quan. You got axed from your own thread because you couldn't follow the sites rules, and the mods there are not lenient and don't tolerate it when it comes to burden of proof.

You cited no real evidence, you constantly ignore it yourself, and still used liberal hyperbole with no basis, meanwhile any hyperbole used by them was based at least in canon sources, the books. You even went as far as to name the Jackson movies as the definitive source.

How can a movie that is based on the original work be the definitive source? By it's very nature, the movies cannot be the definitive source if it is based on something else. You kept crying about movies only (as you normally do) but you should be able to understand by now, there are things that the movies could not cover, therefore one should ALWAYS be able to go back to the canon source material. Many books-to-movies/TV shows are like this, LOTR and the Hobbit are far from the only ones that need this. Game of Thrones/A Song of Ice and Fire is another example.

You are lying. This doesn't come as a surprise as you are still very emotional when it comes to me. You my nerdy little enemy don't have a life and are consumed by hatred.

I cited evidence. They did not. Titles carry no weight in a debate. Saying a god or a Maiar means nothing minus the feats. The Lotr fanboys we're going banshee.

You are taking my comment out of the context in which it was said. It was in reference to it being the definitive film series. Someone suggested another film and I said this was the definitive source albeit when it comes to movies based off the books. 🙂

Now please quit embarrassing yourself and get an actual life, crybaby.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Indeed, I came in after he already got banned from his own thread, and people were literally mocking him as the new clown prince of stupidity.

He will of course deny that he lost completely.... in fact, he already tried.

I won that debate. Hands down. They cried and had it closed. I owned them. I'm amazing. You're pedestrian.

Did you guys take the thread title from one of my quotes?

Originally posted by Lestov16
Did you guys take the thread title from one of my quotes?

We took it from the time we turned you jimmies to ashes.

The thread title should be updated, removing the exclamation mark and instead putting ",Quan!"

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are lying. This doesn't come as a surprise as you are still very emotional when it comes to me. You my nerdy little enemy don't have a life and are consumed by hatred.

I posted a link. People can judge for themselves who is lying.

That's ironic, considering I have not posted here in months. You sir, are even more pathetic than when I left if that is indeed possible.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I cited evidence. They did not. Titles carry no weight in a debate. Saying a god or a Maiar means nothing minus the feats. The Lotr fanboys we're going banshee.

No, you didn't. What you actually did was make a truckload of claims, and didn't show a thing to back it up. You even said the words "Not Youtube Hunting" despite the sites rules regarding that kind of attitude. You failed, thus got kicked.

HAH! If you had read the books, at all, you know, the original source material, the CANON material, you would know what a Maiar is, and what they can do. Just because you're not familiar with the actual work that the movies are based on, does not grant leave for you to dismiss it. Original work that serves as the basis for the movie ALWAYS counts, and you crying movies only cannot ever change that.

And for that reason, they were well within their rights to blast you, because you tried to use your OP to hamstring your opponents.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are taking my comment out of the context in which it was said. It was in reference to it being the definitive film series. Someone suggested another film and I said this was the definitive source albeit when it comes to movies based off the books. 🙂

You never said that, liar. You said the Jackson films are the definitive version, nothing else. The only reason you would say anything as audacious as this is because you have not seen anything else, no other films, and certainly never read the books.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I won that debate. Hands down. They cried and had it closed. I owned them. I'm amazing. You're pedestrian.

Wrong, re-read the thread. You lost, and you had a tantrum when they cited the rules of the forum and had you shot down. Having your thread closed off to you is not a win, that is an epic failure. You keep tooting your own horn even on the face of common sense. I am convinced now that you have some kind of mental defect where vanity and pride rule you, because no sane person would be prideful of a thread where you were the sole person kicked, and you are the OP....

Originally posted by Robtard
What is ICT?
intentional cock teasing.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
I posted a link. People can judge for themselves who is lying.

That's ironic, considering I have not posted here in months. You sir, are even more pathetic than when I left if that is indeed possible.

No, you didn't. What you actually did was make a truckload of claims, and didn't show a thing to back it up. You even said the words "Not Youtube Hunting" despite the sites rules regarding that kind of attitude. You failed, thus got kicked.

HAH! If you had read the books, at all, you know, the original source material, the CANON material, you would know what a Maiar is, and what they can do. Just because you're not familiar with the actual work that the movies are based on, does not grant leave for you to dismiss it. Original work that serves as the basis for the movie ALWAYS counts, and you crying movies only cannot ever change that.

And for that reason, they were well within their rights to blast you, because you tried to use your OP to hamstring your opponents.

You never said that, liar. You said the Jackson films are the definitive version, nothing else. The only reason you would say anything as audacious as this is because you have not seen anything else, no other films, and certainly never read the books.

Wrong, re-read the thread. You lost, and you had a tantrum when they cited the rules of the forum and had you shot down. Having your thread closed off to you is not a win, that is an epic failure. You keep tooting your own horn even on the face of common sense. I am convinced now that you have some kind of mental defect where vanity and pride rule you, because no sane person would be prideful of a thread where you were the sole person kicked, and you are the OP....

I come here to post whereas you come here to talk about me and even my space battles adventures. I destroyed those awful posters. Weak people.

Movies are movies only. I specified which version. You can't come in and alter the op. You're such a loser.

Movie vs. Movie is fair. You're a crybaby who has all kinds of problems.

In response to someone mentioning another potter film. You're stupid and act before you think. Bottom line.

Nemebro even pointed out how stupid they were. You're too emotionally compromised to be honest about me, freak.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I come here to post whereas you come here to talk about me and even my space battles adventures. I destroyed those awful posters. Weak people.

I have been busy with my new career, writing. Shame you couldn't find some semblance of anything resembling a life or a brain during your absence.

Except you didn't.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Movies are movies only. I specified which version. You can't come in and alter the op. You're such a loser.

Indeed, however, the problem is that the version you wish to use is based on another version. You have to refer to the original canon work, otherwise it falls apart. You basically want to rely on the flawed logic of "it is, therefore it is", which is a completely primitive way to try and look at things compared to "it is, because..."

Originally posted by quanchi112
Movie vs. Movie is fair. You're a crybaby who has all kinds of problems.

No, you intentionally cut the vast majority of material from any side that is not an original work, and as Mith said, you did it in a pathetic attempt to hamstring your opponents.

Originally posted by quanchi112
In response to someone mentioning another potter film. You're stupid and act before you think. Bottom line.

What do the Potter films have to do with your comments about Jackson's LOTR series? You basically admitted to making a demented leap of logic based on nothing.

Projecting your own inadequacies again. I honestly believe that you don't even understand the words you type.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nemebro even pointed out how stupid they were. You're too emotionally compromised to be honest about me, freak.

A subjective opinion on his part, and he is entitled to that. Doesn't make him right tho.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
I have been busy with my new career, writing. Shame you couldn't find some semblance of anything resembling a life or a brain during your absence.

Except you didn't.

Indeed, however, the problem is that the version you wish to use is [b]based on another version. You have to refer to the original canon work, otherwise it falls apart. You basically want to rely on the flawed logic of "it is, therefore it is", which is a completely primitive way to try and look at things compared to "it is, because..."

No, you intentionally cut the vast majority of material from any side that is not an original work, and as Mith said, you did it in a pathetic attempt to hamstring your opponents.

What do the Potter films have to do with your comments about Jackson's LOTR series? You basically admitted to making a demented leap of logic based on nothing.

Projecting your own inadequacies again. I honestly believe that you don't even understand the words you type.

A subjective opinion on his part, and he is entitled to that. Doesn't make him right tho. [/B]

Even worse since you still continued to talk about me in a obsessed fashion. The one day on here you said you were going to retire as you have done it all. You're a weak individual who is all over the map.

No, as we don't need to use the book as Peter Jackson took what he wanted to and im basically arguing Peter Jackson's Lotr not Tolkien's. Op decides what counts and you cannot alter the rules and break them, loser.

No, I did it to argue the movie versus characters. If you want to argue the book versions then feel free to do so but kindly stay out of my threads or else your vagina will continue to bleed.

No, I mean lotr films as someone mentioned another film. Jackson's is the definitive film version. Period.

Just like your opinion is subjective but the guys I er there were biased fools trying to cite the books left and right. That is a signs of bias and idiots like yourself make it so easy.

Happy Thanksgiving people

'bout to get all up in some turkey jimmies.

Try not to eat all the pumpkin pie this time, Bruce