Off Topic Circle Jerk

Started by Time-Immemorial1,317 pages

😂

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
You couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
ot a single clip showed that, liar.

Incorrect, Scenario handedly trashed you on this. Don't back out now b!tch.

You being worked up is a fact. I agree.

Lol, your amusing today, you actually think your important.

Because I like it. I also like out debating people like you.

Without success mind you. 😆

The point.

There was no point, so you are calling for a non existing concession? Wow.

Says the guy who fled after the red matter incident of 2015.

Says the guy who ****ed up his own insults of no "c" in semantics. Says the guy who doesn't know the definition of perfect accuracy. [/B][/QUOTE] That was a joke and you're really worked up. Just stay on space battles, weakling.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
You couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag.
Says the cockroach. Just run away the lights just came on.

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
That was a joke and you're really worked up. Just stay on space battles, weakling.

No, that's you making excuses for ****ing up, and badly.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
No, that's you making excuses for ****ing up, and badly.
If I have the time I'll be back on that board but as it stands I only have time to post on this board. Deal with it, creep.

Originally posted by quanchi112
If I have the time I'll be back on that board but as it stands I only have time to post on this board. Deal with it, creep.

Gutless wonder retreating. Glorious.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Gutless wonder retreating. Glorious.
I am too busy and I don't like to waste time on hypocritical boards that are very slow. Bring me space battles sissies here so I mock them and eviscerate them. You brought a over a troll who flat out ignores film facts.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am too busy and I don't like to waste time on hypocritical boards that are very slow. Bring me space battles sissies here so I mock them and eviscerate them. You brought a over a troll who flat out ignores film facts.

You gutless wonder, and double standard reliant toad, heh.

No, he only ignores your sh!t interpretation.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
You gutless wonder, and double standard reliant toad, heh.

No, he only ignores your sh!t interpretation.

I'm the guy that always sees things through but I don't care to go to every other shit board.

He flat out said Khan isn't a super soldier, the cellular regeneration doesn't count, he can't survive falling 98 feet, etc. the dudes a troll.

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
I'm the guy that always sees things through but I don't care to go to every other shit board.

Then why did you bother posting there at all? You backed off, and you have no excuse.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He flat out said Khan isn't a super soldier, the cellular regeneration doesn't count, he can't survive falling 98 feet, etc. the dudes a troll.

That's because he relies on the actual canon, and not your overly grandiose interpretation.

You don't get to decide what qualifies as a supersoldier Quan.

And strictly speaking, we never saw Khan himself regenerate wounds. He should have been pretty fine after getting KTFO by Spock, but he was ended right there, and then. Nothing remarkable about Khan's actual regeneration.

And that's just from observing Into Darkness. Mith however, points that abrams interpretation of Augments was all over the place, and deviated so badly from the actual canon, and you know what, he is not wrong. A lot of stuff was shoehorned in as padding.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Then why did you bother posting there at all? You backed off, and you have no excuse.

That's because he relies on the actual canon, and not your overly grandiose interpretation.

You don't get to decide what qualifies as a supersoldier Quan.

And strictly speaking, we never saw Khan himself regenerate wounds. He should have been pretty fine after getting KTFO by Spock, but he was ended right there, and then. Nothing remarkable about Khan's actual regeneration.

And that's just from observing Into Darkness. Mith however, points that abrams interpretation of Augments was all over the place, and deviated so badly from the actual canon, and you know what, he is not wrong. A lot of stuff was shoehorned in as padding.

I am too busy here.

Thr actual canon for this Khan is this movie. He's ignoring this film when discussing this character, dummy. He agreed this version was a super soldier and said its insane. You're too stupid to even discuss this over.

He just crash landed, was stun blasted eight times, had a bone broken, and was jacked numerous times physically and with a metal object by a superhuman. Your friend called Khan a demigod and that it was bs because the first Khan basically had none of these skills. He agreed Khan was amazing and didn't think it should count.

When debating that character you can't ignore film facts because that makes you biased aka picking and choosing.

😂 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am too busy here.

Bullshit, all you do here is reply, and never offer anything meaningful.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thr actual canon for this Khan is this movie. He's ignoring this film when discussing this character, dummy. He agreed this version was a super soldier and said its insane. You're too stupid to even discuss this over.

Wrong. It is based off the source material, which is how it works. You failed, and you don't even understand the character you root for.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He just crash landed, was stun blasted eight times, had a bone broken, and was jacked numerous times physically and with a metal object by a superhuman. Your friend called Khan a demigod and that it was bs because the first Khan basically had none of these skills. He agreed Khan was amazing and didn't think it should count.

That means Khan f@cked up and got jacked. Undeniable. The regen doesn't even apply to Khan himself because of these facts.

Which according to the source material, doesn't.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When debating that character you can't ignore film facts because that makes you biased aka picking and choosing.

Oh, kinda like how you enjoy nerfing SW characters to better suit you? Remember Darth Gimpy? 😆

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Bullshit, all you do here is reply, and never offer anything meaningful.

Wrong. It is based off the source material, which is how it works. You failed, and you don't even understand the character you root for.

That means Khan f@cked up and got jacked. Undeniable. The regen doesn't even apply to Khan himself because of these facts.

Which according to the source material, doesn't.

Oh, kinda like how you enjoy nerfing SW characters to better suit you? Remember Darth Gimpy? 😆

My post count just hear is greater than your grand total from all boards so yeah no time. Sorry.

Retconned. That's how it works if a new director decides to place something in an established fictional setting. We are debating into Darkness Khan and your friend is the one who dubbed him a super soldier, idiot. I do understand and don't ignore the new timeline Khan not the other pathetic crybaby exposing his chest.

Thr source material for Into Darkness Khan is the film Into Darkness. You're like border line retarded. Khan was against the enterprise crew, starfleet, and Klingons so one superhuman badass against galactic forces. Khan still lives. 😂

You can restrict characters but you must do so in the op. This guy didn't restrict anything and still said it didn't count. Trollsville, mama's boy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
My post count just hear is greater than your grand total from all boards so yeah no time. Sorry.

Yeah, you have no idea where else I post, so you can beat that imaginary meat all you like.

That still doesn't mean any one of those posts contains anything even remotely meaningful or intelligent.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Retconned. That's how it works if a new director decides to place something in an established fictional setting. We are debating into Darkness Khan and your friend is the one who dubbed him a super soldier, idiot. I do understand and don't ignore the new timeline Khan not the other pathetic crybaby exposing his chest.

Ahahahahahaaa, according to you, that means Into Darkness isn't even Star Trek. Excellent.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thr source material for Into Darkness Khan is the film Into Darkness. You're like border line retarded. Khan was against the enterprise crew, starfleet, and Klingons so one superhuman badass against galactic forces. Khan still lives. 😂

Frozen.

The source material is ALL of Star Trek you flaming reject, Augments were a thing before the timeline split, or have you forgotten when that happened?

And all that proves is that the script writers for ST '09 and Into Darkness pretty much had no clue as to what they were writing about.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can restrict characters but you must do so in the op. This guy didn't restrict anything and still said it didn't count. Trollsville, mama's boy.

No, he makes it perfectly clear that he disregards shit that doesn't make sense.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero

Yeah, you have no idea wherelse I post, so you can beat that imaginary meat all you like.

That still doesn't mean any one of those posts contains anything even remotely meaningful or intelligent.

Ahahahahahaaa, according to you, that means Into Darkness isn't even Star Trek. Excellent.

Frozen.

The source material is ALL of Star Trek you flaming reject, Augments were a thing before the timeline split, or have you forgotten when that happened?

And all that proves is that the script writers for ST '09 and Into Darkness pretty much had no clue as to what they were writing about.

No, he makes it perfectly clear that he disregards shit that doesn't make sense.

I don't care for your emotional opinion. My point is I post way more than you ever have. I also bang much hotter women. 😂

That means they changed something about Khan. All previous canon is still there and the new timeline is canon as well. You're borderline retarded if you think a recon means that isn't canon.

Retconned. This is NuTrek and they decided what is canon not you. If you deny the films or his abilities that makes you a troll. Plain and simple.

Whatever any films show counts. You can't say I don't like this evidence it doesn't count. If you go down that slippery slope then you'd have posters disregarding whatever facts they deemed stupid. I accept all facts because otherwise it's pure bias.

💃

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't care for your emotional opinion. My point is I post way more than you ever have. I also bang much hotter women. 😂

No, your point was you think posting more often than I do actually has meaning, when all it proves is that you have no life. I mean you don't work, you don't go out, you do nothing except sleep and KMC. I can't walk anymore, and I have more of a life than you do.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That means they changed something about Khan. All previous canon is still there and the new timeline is canon as well. You're borderline retarded if you think a recon means that isn't canon.

Except it still relies on prior events of the Augments. Khan's empire, the Eugenics Wars and the journey of the SS Botany Bay. With these prior events, the retcon makes no sense.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Retconned. This is NuTrek and they decided what is canon not you. If you deny the films or his abilities that makes you a troll. Plain and simple.

See above.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Whatever any films show counts. You can't say I don't like this evidence it doesn't count. If you go down that slippery slope then you'd have posters disregarding whatever facts they deemed stupid. I accept all facts because otherwise it's pure bias.

You've already disregarded evidence when it suits your arguments before. Example, the Force ability to TK weapons out of hands, or crush bodies, or throw bodies around. So please, spare me your innane justifications and useless proclamations about being objective, when you cherrypick far worse than any opposition you have ever faced.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
No, your point was you think posting more often than I do actually has meaning, when all it proves is that you have no life. I mean you don't work, you don't go out, you do nothing except sleep and KMC. I can't walk anymore, and I have more of a life than you do.

Except it still relies on prior events of the Augments. Khan's empire, the Eugenics Wars and the journey of the SS Botany Bay. With these prior events, the retcon makes no sense.

See above.

You've already disregarded evidence when it suits your arguments before. Example, the Force ability to TK weapons out of hands, or crush bodies, or throw bodies around. So please, spare me your innane justifications and useless proclamations about being objective, when you cherrypick far worse than any opposition you have ever faced.

When I post I do it in spades.

Why doesn't it make any sense ? They retconned it. We can't ignore these facts.

No, I didn't say they couldn't do so I said they can't easily do so against an extremely skilled opponent. It's a battle of reflexes and if they don't focus on their opponent they will get shot so they'd have to look for an opening in order to do so.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When I post I do it in spades.

That is utterly meaningless if the posts contain nothing but vitrol. Like that spammer who was posting porn earlier today.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why doesn't it make any sense ? They retconned it. We can't ignore these facts.

Because the abilities of Augments has been established during the Eugenics Wars, before the time split.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I didn't say they couldn't do so I said they can't easily do so against an extremely skilled opponent. It's a battle of reflexes and if they don't focus on their opponent they will get shot so they'd have to look for an opening in order to do so.

Yeah, because skill has bearing on how well one can grip their weapon, or keep themselves from being mentally thrown around, or stops giant objects being hurled at them...

You have also claimed Khan has 100% perfect accuracy, despite clearly not proving that claim, and demanding others disprove it.