Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I did not sandbag you. I dont wish to talk to you👆 There is a difference. Or is your intent to troll and piss me off to get me to talk to you?
Not at all. My intent was to try and find out why you changed your mind right back to disagreeing with me, AFTER you said I had convinced you I was right. It was wierd. But you never answered me that.
But saying you were IGNORING me is the definition of sandbagging me, another defininitive word is stonewalling.
He's done, he lost all credibility. He's been embarrassed over and over, and on top of it, he admits he does not have to back any claim he makes with actual evidence or profs. And the. When you post proof he ignores it, or moves goal posts. I can't believe anyone here including myself have wasted the amount of time they have with this *****.
See ya KT clown.
Originally posted by Robtard
So it is looking more and more like it wasn't "Islamic terrorism", guy had rage and suspected he might have contracted HIV.LoL at all the reactionaries like TI who were the first to cry the ISIS card before knowing more.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
[b]FBI: No evidence that Omar Mateen had gay lovershttp://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/06/fbi-no-evidence-that-mateen-had-gay-affairs.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-no-evidence-that-omar-mateen-had-gay-lovers-2016-6?r=UK&IR=T [/B]
😂😂
Must suck to be wrong so much.
Originally posted by Robtard
So it is looking more and more like it wasn't "Islamic terrorism", guy had rage and suspected he might have contracted HIV.What all the reactionaries like TI who were the first to cry the ISIS card before knowing more.
FBI: No evidence that Omar Mateen had gay lovers
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...ay-affairs.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-...6?r=UK&IR=T
Reactionaries like yourself who were the first to cry it was not terrorism, and then peddled to "he was gay" only to find out, you were so wrong, how embarrassing.