Originally posted by janus77
come on, it may be a bit OTT but it's insanely funny no?
that image of Red kicking Thor's hat away, a punt that cracks me up as much as the OG Hulk punting Monet.
I wouldn't spend my money on it though.
I wouldn't care that Red Hulk was beating people that were out of his league if everything didn't seem random with no actually story and the dialog wasn't horrible.
But hey, that's just me. 😛
oh the dialogue has been horrible in most of the issues so far, but the one where Banner was analysing Red's mind through a reconstruction was a good story imo.
and this one, I'm just interested because it is absolutely cracking me up... beating up Thor with his own mallet, punting his hat away, saying that he doesn't believe in God just before he punches Thor into space ... like or loathe Hulk, that stuff's just wickedly well written "bad assery".
I'm just enthused about it from a spectacle point of view... overall, it sucks to have everything Banner/Hulk has developed over 3-4 years wiped out in one go, but ... at least there's some laughs to be had 😄
"well written badassery"
I wrote this:
Originally posted by xmarksthespotas parody of Loeb's hackery and sophomoric "humor". But you'd actually think it was "cool" wouldn't you. Should probably add a whole bunch of pouches to his costume too. And more giant guns.
Rulk wins while swearing, doing the fingers, shooting a gun and f*cking Ms Marvel. 'Cause he's badass. The swearing is @#$%@ed though, the fingers are blackboxed and the ****ing is off-panel. And there's certainly no smoking.And yes. He punches him out.
Surreal.
'Spose there's no accounting for taste...
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
"well written badassery"I wrote this:
as parody of Loeb's hackery and sophomoric "humor". But you'd actually think it was "cool" wouldn't you. Should probably add a whole bunch of pouches to his costume too. And more giant guns.Surreal.
'Spose there's no accounting for taste...
How do we know Loeb isn't intentionally parodying the genera? The stories feel like they're styled after Deadpool. Also you have to love the Freudian symbolism of Rulk beating Thor with his own hammer.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
How do we know Loeb isn't intentionally parodying the genera? The stories feel like they're styled after Deadpool. Also you have to love the Freudian symbolism of Rulk beating Thor with his own hammer.
Styled after Deadpool, are you serious?
In what way?
And I'm Loeb thought about the Freudian symbolism...🙄
Originally posted by Symmetric ChaosAgain Strange>>Thor in terms of magical abilities and magical feats save runes,etc.
He used Mjolnir.From that we know he can use magic. We have never seen magic fail to work for him. We have never seen magic work on him.
Strange>>>>>Rulk in terms of magical abilities until proven otherwise.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
The man recently behind Onslaught Reborn, Ultimates III and feline-mutants and Sasquatch being Lupine Sapiens in Wolverine and killing Sabretooth out of logical continuity... was going for Freudian Symbolism...
So was CarlBanks but whatcha gonna do?
And from what I hear UltimatesIII is . . . heh, I almost said "one long phallic symbol" but I stopped myself just in time . . . let's go with focused on exactly that.
Originally posted by UtrigitaOk at least a few of you on here actually debate and present evidence to prove your points.
First maker was less powerful then Kosmos.Here Kubik talking with Kosmos about the greater powers in the universe, Allow me to present the watchers (granted the lowest of greater)
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/360889/Fantastic_Four_Annual_23-46.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/360890/Fantastic_Four_Annual_23-47.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/360891/Fantastic_Four_Annual_23-48.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/360892/Fantastic_Four_Annual_23-49.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/360912/Fantastic_Four_Annual_23-51.jpg.htmlPlease note at link four "we have only grown [b]sufficiantly
transcendent to attract the attention of the watchers."That's some comment when you look at beings that can warp a universe. Please also note number five, where Kubik is talking about how the greater powers tricked Kosmos, Thanos is mentioned correct, but please get no illusions, he is at the next page showed as a agent for Death, and he is placed there because well as you know he does indeed have a place with the evil ones, but the powerlevels between those listed are greatly different.
furthermore marvel appendix
http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/kosmoscube.htm
Go down to Thanos#10(fb)
Please. "You have made yourself vulnerable taken mortal form why?"
Show me Rulk defeating him and the Watcher actively fight back because in this battle I doubt that the Watcher will just stand there also was Uatu knocked out? And under what circumstances was the Watcher there? [/B]
The first set of scans show that they indeed are powerful. I by no means intended for anyone to think I thought lowly of them. But this all started when were fooled by the Rulk's victory over one of them. I know that the watcher didnt fight to the best of his abilities and I know that loeb wrote it. That being said its a showing that shows they are susceptible to a physical beatdown. Now in these scans Kubik refers to he and Kosmos as inferior or insignificant beings to themselves. Ok fine Ill accept that the Maker/Kosmos is less than a Watcher. Thanos proved that the Maker was inferior to he as well in combat.
But that being said I still hold the opinion that Odin or Tyrant could defeat a Watcher and also Thanos. As long as Thanos sruvives the Watchers assault and he will survive with his durability he can still beat down a Watcher. This Rulk showing indicates that Uatu doesnt have a respectable damage soak imo.
Originally posted by fangirl101Superman needed help against Darkseid. He didnt wrote apokolips now. I usually dont even bring up the source wall feat as he had WW's help. Apokolips now was a fair fight and wasnt written by loeb.
It seems that people can use Leob's interpretation of Darksied against Superman and take it seriously, but when he touches thier precious Thor, then all of a sudden he's a tard. I think all loeb interpretations should be banned fromt he forum.
Originally posted by BadabingIncorrect. Thanos is too much man for Rulk. Just because Rulk beat on a Watcher who vows to not interfere everyone is up in arms. LOL.
Rulk will just stare Thanos down and will win. Thanos will self bfr. 😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Incorrect. Thanos is too much man for Rulk. Just because Rulk beat on a Watcher who vows to not interfere everyone is up in arms. LOL.
No one is too much of a man for Rulk. He walks in and makes Thanos beg for mercy but then breaks his arms anyway.
In case you haven't caught on, no one really believes these things about Rulk they're nothing more than humorous commentary on how the character is written.
Originally posted by darthgooberOk he survived the ig onslaught. Impressive. Thanos has survived Odin's assault and he has destroyed galaxies before as well. I think we cant judge this personally on a collateral damage angle.
I'm not defending Rulk beating down Uatu because I think it's one of the stupidest ideas ever conceived, but if we take the feat as is then Rulk's punching power would be far beyond anything Thanos has ever shown.The Watcher(as an observer) survives a battle that destroys whole solar systems...
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9881/theinfinityguantlet0508vk7.jpg
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/9533/theinfinityguantlet0509lf8.jpgUatu withstands an attack that spans a thousand different planes of Reality...
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/545/f440035rd5.jpgThose are significant feats of durability, and any who can put down a being with that kind of power with only a few punches would be far superior to most top tiers in the strength department.
A Wacther can get beat down physically so if Thanos survives the wacther's onslaught he wins. I think he will survive it. His durability is insane.
Originally posted by Symmetric ChaosI understood it the first time. Your attempts at mockery amuse me. But its not that I claim that Thanos cant be beaten down physically he can just not by the likes of the watcheror Rulk. I cant imagine Uatu brawling with anyone either. 😂
He was pointing at that I was using the No-Limits fallacy that you constantly constantly apply to your favorite characters in order to mock you and demonstrate why it is poor logic.
