United States Presidential Election 2008 - Official Discussion Thread

Started by sithsaber408143 pages

Originally posted by Bardock42
And we should let gay couples adopt. Cause parents again spend more, and also the children wouldn't have to be paid for by the tax payers.

That's actually a sweet idea sithsabre had there.

And here's another: spending will go even higher for the psychologists/counselors/life experts to help those kids out when they turn 21 and are confused about who they are! 😱

Liberalism: Screwing everything up and making it all cost more! 😱

And improving the economy apparently.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
No the answer is: GAY MARRIAGE! 😱

Oh, and an abortion or 2 for fun.

Even though you're being sarcastic, Gay Marriage in California has stimulated the Californian economy, businesses are doing well because those sinning homos are getting married and spending money because of it. You can thank the gays in private.

Originally posted by BackFire
And improving the economy apparently.

Indeed, the democratic controlled congress of the last 2 years has done a great job!

Originally posted by sithsaber408
And here's another: spending will go even higher for the psychologists/counselors/life experts to help those kids out when they turn 21 and are confused about who they are! 😱

Yeah, that wouldn't happen, though. And even if, if it's privately spend your economy can only profit.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Liberalism: Screwing everything up and making it all cost more! 😱

Ah, come on, your liberals and your conservatives are the same but in name. They're just making a competition out of who can make you stupid Americans bend over more.

Originally posted by Robtard
Even though you're being sarcastic, Gay Marriage in California has stimulated the Californian economy, businesses are doing well because those sinning homos are getting married and spending money because of it. You can thank the gays in private.
For all of 2 months? Hardly enough time to prove that.

Regardless, 61% of people voted against it here, and believe me we'll do it again in November.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
And here's another: spending will go even higher for the psychologists/counselors/life experts to help those kids out when they turn 21 and are confused about who they are! 😱

Liberalism: Screwing everything up and making it all cost more! 😱

Why would they be confused? Do you think gays only come out of gay parents?

Originally posted by Robtard
Why would they be confused? Do you think gays only come out of gay parents?

Wouldn't you be confused learning about natural human reproduction in biology then come home to daddy and daddy doing it on the couch?

Major therapy needed.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
For all of 2 months? Hardly enough time to prove that.

Regardless, 61% of people voted against it here, and believe me we'll do it again in November.

Actually, those marriages are factually helping the economy, the numbers don't lie.

Will it be ongoing though? That depends if gay couples keep getting married.

Edit: Forgot to address your second paragraph.

It's odd you say "regardless, I'll vote against it". Wouldn't the boosting of the economy be a good thing, which you'd want to keep?

Straight parents automatically = well adjusted kids... ha.

Learning about reproduction from a gay parent will automatically scar a kid for life resulting in need of counseling... ha.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Wouldn't you be confused learning about natural human reproduction in biology then come home to daddy and daddy doing it on the couch?

Major therapy needed.

Depends, would my two fathers have told me that two men having sex make babies, or would they have told me that male/female reproduction produces a child and then explained that they're a gay couple?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Wouldn't you be confused learning about natural human reproduction in biology then come home to daddy and daddy doing it on the couch?

Major therapy needed.

Haha, look, just because you swallow everything your pastor jizzes in your mouth, doesn't mean that every child would. In fact, I'd assume that a child of gay parents wouldn't really come too close to fundies crazy thoughts to get screwed up for life. I'd imagine it'd be like that "Dads, all my friends have a mommy and a daddy, why do I have two daddies" - "That's because your dad and your dad love each other very much and wanted to live with each other as partner" - "Cool, I will go play Baseball and not be screwed up by endless fear of a muscular demon raping me with his spiky cock in an imaginary after life" - "We love you, son".

Originally posted by Bardock42
"We love you, son".
OMG INCEST!

lol gays are more likely to molest kids cos they're sick ****s.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Wouldn't you be confused learning about natural human reproduction in biology then come home to daddy and daddy doing it on the couch?

Major therapy needed.

Bigotry much?

Originally posted by Strangelove
Bigotry much?

Sorry, bigotry isn't a Christian value.

-

Anyhow, I hear Hillarity speaking in the background (wife is watching DNC), how she doing?

Well, Keith Olbermann, who was rather critical of Clinton during the primary, just said "Grand slam."

She did pretty damn well.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Well, Keith Olbermann, who was rather critical of Clinton during the primary, just said "Grand slam."

She did pretty damn well.

Olbermann has one humongous head, he could easily crush toddlers with it.

Glad to hear that though, I thought she'd make it all about her.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Haha, look, just because you swallow everything your pastor jizzes in your mouth, doesn't mean that every child would.

Holy Schecter-like posts, Batman.

Originally posted by Bardock42
and not be screwed up by endless fear of a muscular demon raping me with his spiky cock in an imaginary after life"

You make that sound like it's bad...

Originally posted by Strangelove
Bigotry much?

Biology much?

Homosexuality isn't natural, I don't care HOW much you try to pee on my leg and tell me it's raining.

The voters in CA (a fairly liberal place, I'm told) will agree with me when we vote in November, you'll see.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Biology much?

Homosexuality isn't natural, I don't care HOW much you try to pee on my leg and tell me it's raining.

The voters in CA (a fairly liberal place, I'm told) will agree with me when we vote in November, you'll see.

Oh dear, the biology debate from a republican. Have a good long look back at history my friend, see what's natural about the modern world.

For a start, there's actual evidence that there's a biological instinct to copulate, not to breed. Then of course there's the hypocrisy of Republican party itself.