Originally posted by SmashBro
Which is an all out lie.
Nope, it's the truth.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Gouki didn't have a aura in that ending.
Yes, he does you tard.
Look:
http://www.fightersgeneration.com/characters/akumasf3end2.gif
Nevermind Akuma's ending I posted:
http://www.vgmuseum.com/end/arcade/a/sfa2akuma2.gif
Originally posted by SmashBro
And that whole little thing was about the portraits. I never really thought I had to be more specific than that since I thought you knew what we were talking about.
You I not once posted anything showing Regular Gouki with an Aura. Even though I posted it.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You're so whack, it's pitiful.
Your such a tard it's funny. 🙂
Originally posted by SmashBro
Bull crap.
What have you posted other than bad quotes?
Originally posted by SmashBro
I see alot of whining but no actual arguments.
Then your a liar.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I'm referring to the PLAYERS, not me. I'm saying that I thought they changed the color of his gis so players won't get them two confused.
How would the perspective of the players not apply to us? Did you make the game now? Yes. Gi's are different which is how they are differentiated.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Which is why I brought up the portraits.
Which proves what? The Gi's all contradict. . .
Originally posted by SmashBro
Look in the mirror.
I see a handsome young man.
Originally posted by SmashBro
When I was referring to [b]portraits? Pay attention. [/B]
Which you never specified and the portraits section has an illustration of regular Gouki with his Aura covering his body you ass hat.
Originally posted by SmashBroI already knew about that pic. That's how that whole thing about aura started in the first place. I was referring to the OTHER ones to the others that you showed me. That was obviously wasn't on his back so common sense would tell you that I referring to the other ones you posted and not that one.
Then why the hell did you quote it?
Also, those are all the same aura's which was the point of the pics. To show you that the color is inconsistent you tard. Nevermind that I stated already that the Aura in game looks different because of a technical graphical issue which was fixed later on.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Nope, it's the truth.
Nope, it's a lie.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Yes, he does.Look:
Nevermind Akuma's ending I posted:
I could barely see that aura so my mistake. But I already know about the second one.
Originally posted by Classic NES
You I not once posted anything showing Regular Gouki with an Aura. Even though I posted it.
I said you've not posted regular Gouki with the SAME aura as Shin Gouki and I was referring to the portraits.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Your such a tard it's funny. 🙂
You're so whack it's pitiful
Originally posted by Classic NES
What have you posted other than bad quotes?
Those quotes weren't even bad.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Then your a liar.
No, I'm not. It's basically "if you're talking about this, then you're big tard". Just whining.
Originally posted by Classic NES
How would the perspective of the players not apply to us? Did you make the game now? Yes. Gi's are different which is how they are differentiated.
I didn't say it didn't apply to us. You asked me "what is the confusion" and I was talking about everybody, not just me. Maybe you didn't understand, do to the way I worded it.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Which proves what? The Gi's all contradict. . .
No, about the auras. You see more of it when he's Shin Gouki just like you could in the SFA2 ending.
Originally posted by Classic NES
I see a handsome young man.
Then you're on drugs. 🙂
Originally posted by Classic NES
Which you never specified and the portraits section has an [B]illustration of regular Gouki with his Aura covering his body you.
That's because I thought you were keeping up with the argument, in which you weren't.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Then why the hell did you quote it?
You had it all on the same post! Besides, I thought it was clear to you that I already knew about the purple since we were talking about that BEFORE you posted the sprites.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Also, those are all the same aura's which was the point of the pics. To show you that the color is inconsistent. Nevermind that I stated already that the Aura in game looks different because of a technical graphical issue which was fixed later on.
You never told me what you meant by "graphical issue". You posted the pics to show them that they are inconsistent, at the same time, we were also talking about how it was glowing AROUND his body, which is the reason why I said "it's still only on his back".
Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you, my dick is too far down your throat.
I've told you time and time again that posts like that are not appropriate. This is a warning. Next time I see it, it's going to be a temp ban.
Knock it off, you are not funny, it simply makes you appear like an immature child who swears simply because they're told not to.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Nope, it's a lie.
Nope, it's the truth.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I could barely see that aura so my mistake. But I already know about the second one.
WTF, You know about the second and yet you claimed I never once posted regular Gouki aura?
Also, I thought you didn't make a mistake in this thread?
Originally posted by SmashBro
I said you've not posted regular Gouki with the SAME aura as Shin Gouki and I was referring to the portraits.
That's a lie, you stated that I didn't post regular Gouki's Aura once when I did twice.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You're so whack it's pitiful
Your such a tard it's hilarious 🙂
Originally posted by SmashBro
Those quotes weren't even bad.
Considering you quoted two unrelated things
Originally posted by SmashBro
No, I'm not. It's basically "if you're talking about this, then you're big tard". Just whining.
What a pathetic Strawman, I asked you to specify which illustration you were talking about you tard.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I didn't say it didn't apply to us. You asked me "what is the confusion" and I was talking about everybody, not just me. Maybe you didn't understand, do to the way I worded it.
There is no confusion since the colors of the Gi are to differentiate like you said. The Gi in Ryu's ending is the wrong color.
Originally posted by SmashBro
No, about the auras. You see more of it when he's Shin Gouki just like you could in the SFA2 ending.
In Akuma's ending his Aura is huge and it's a completely different color than Shin's.
Originally posted by SmashBroThen you're on drugs. 🙂
Not your kind.
Originally posted by SmashBroThat's because I thought you were keeping up with the argument, in which you weren't.
So, why would state such an incorrect statement? You never specified the portraits when you claimed that I didn't post Akuma's aura, nevermind that I posted an ending with the Aura. You just conceded it in your own stupid way.
Originally posted by SmashBroYou had it all on the same post! Besides, I thought it was clear to you that I already knew about the purple since we were talking about that BEFORE you posted the sprites.
I posted the sprites to counter the claim that the aura indicated he was Shin Gouki. You quoted the purple sprite and stated that his aura was only on his back. What's even dumber is that you did not quote all the sprites. So, you new what you were quoting. So, it's wither a mistake or your just a tard.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You never told me what you meant by "graphical issue". You posted the pics to show them that they are inconsistent, at the same time, we were also talking about how it was glowing AROUND his body, which is the reason why I said "it's still only on his back".
And, I brought up the shading issue for the Aura.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Nope, it's the truth.
Nope, it's a lie.
Originally posted by Classic NES
WTF, You know about the second and yet you claimed I never once posted regular Gouki aura?Also, I thought you didn't make a mistake in this thread?
I said with the SAME AURA!
I said people don't make a mistake just because YOU make one. Also, I thought I was afraid to admit being wrong.
Originally posted by Classic NES
That's a lie, you stated that I didn't post regular Gouki's Aura once when I did twice.
Read what I said again; I said you didn't post Gouki with the same aura as Shin Gouki.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Your such a tard it's hilarious 🙂
You're so whack, it's pitiful.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Considering you quoted two unrelated things
No, they were related.
Originally posted by Classic NES
What a pathetic Strawman, I asked you to specify which illustration you were talking about you tard.
Then you followed up with:
"I pray your not talking about that pic because it would make you a tard beyond my wildest nightmares."
Originally posted by Classic NES
There is no confusion since the colors of the Gi are to differentiate like you said. The Gi in Ryu's ending is the wrong color.
That's the whole point; they made them different to AVOID confusion. They do this in alot of fighting games.
Originally posted by Classic NES
In Akuma's ending his Aura is huge and it's a completely different color than Shin's.
Nope, his aura looked just like Shin Akuma's.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Not your kind.
I'm not on any kind.
Originally posted by Classic NES
So, why would state such an incorrect statement? You never specified the portraits when you claimed that I didn't post Akuma's aura, nevermind that I posted an ending with the Aura. You just conceded it in your own stupid way.
That's where this part of the discussion came from; the portraits, therefore, I thought you already knew what I was referring.
Originally posted by Classic NES
I posted the sprites to counter the claim that the aura indicated he was Shin Gouki. You quoted the purple sprite and stated that his aura was only on his back. What's even dumber is that you did not quote all the sprites. So, you new what you were quoting. So, it's wither a mistake or your just a tard.
You either just ignored what I said or you got a terrible understanding problem. When I said "it was only on his back" I was referring to the yellow and blue color, the ones that you said you were showing me.
To refresh your poor poor memory:
Originally posted by Classic NES
He always has an Aura glowing around him, so what?
Originally posted by SmashBro
Not that pink looking one he had before he punched the ground. Usually he's seen with a red one.
Originally posted by Classic NES
You are aware that his aura changes colors, right? Also, how does that prove he's going all out?
Originally posted by SmashBro
What other colors are his aura besides red and pink?
Originally posted by Classic NES
Yellow, red, Blue
Originally posted by Classic NES
And, I brought up the shading issue for the Aura.
Right.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Nope, it's a lie.
Nah, it's true and notice how you cannot refute it.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I said with the SAME AURA!
I already posted it you tard when I pointed out that Regular Gouki has the same aura and a contradicting one all in one ending.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I said people don't make a mistake just because YOU make one. Also, I thought I was afraid to admit being wrong.
That's a lie, you claimed that you didn't make a mistake.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Read what I said again; I said you didn't post Gouki with the same aura as Shin Gouki.
God you a tard, you said I didn't once post an illustration featuring the aura of Regular Gouki covering his body. When I posted it several times than you claimed the portraits, even though I posted it then. Then you claimed you know about the second when before you claimed I did not post it once. . .what a tard.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You're so whack, it's pitiful.
Your so high it's funny 🙂
Originally posted by SmashBroNo, they were related.
They weren't even addressing the same thing and were not even on the same page.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Then you followed up with:"I pray your not talking about that pic because it would make you a tard beyond my wildest nightmares."
I posted more than that you lying tard, since you were stupid enough to not specify which picture you were reffering too. Again, which picture are you talking about you tard?
Originally posted by SmashBro
That's the whole point; they made them different to AVOID confusion. They do this in alot of fighting games.
I never said otherwise, I said that the aura's are wrong because they don't fit the right Gi's made to differentiate.
Originally posted by SmashBroNope, his aura looked just like Shin Akuma's.
Not Akuma's ending you fruit loop.
Originally posted by SmashBro
That's where this part of the discussion came from; the portraits, therefore, I thought you already knew what I was referring.
How would I know if you claimed I did not post any of Regular Gouki's Aura not even once. Even though I posted it in both the sprites and portraits?
Originally posted by SmashBro
You either just ignored what I said or you got a terrible understanding problem. When I said "it was only on his back" I was referring to the yellow and blue color, the ones that you said you were showing me.To refresh your poor poor memory:
Bad quoting again, you forget all the post mentioning how you didn't see other colors in the games and me posting the sprites to show the other colors.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Nah, it's true and notice how you cannot refute it.
Nah, it's a lie and notice how you cannot prove it.
Originally posted by Classic NES
I already posted it you tard when I pointed out that Regular Gouki has the same aura and a contradicting one all in one ending.That's a lie, you claimed that you didn't make a mistake.
Not the same aura as Shin Akuma
And for my comment you called a lie:
Originally posted by SmashBro
Maybe because I'm not and maybe because people don't make the same mistakes just because you made it.
Originally posted by Classic NES
you said I didn't once post an illustration featuring the aura of Regular Gouki covering his body. When I posted it several times than you claimed the portraits, even though I posted it then. Then you claimed you know about the second when before you claimed I did not post it once. . .
You once again ignored what I said.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Your so high it's funny 🙂
You're so whack, it's pitiful.
Originally posted by Classic NES
They weren't even addressing the same thing and were not even on the same page.
Then tell me what they were addressing?
Originally posted by Classic NES
I posted more than that you, since you were stupid enough to not specify which picture you were reffering too. Again, which picture are you talking about?
I said FOLLOWED UP, meaning your quote came after what you said. I never said that you didn't say the other part. Work on your reading comprehension.
And I was talking about his Card Fighters pic.
Originally posted by Classic NES
I never said otherwise, I said that the aura's are wrong because they don't fit the right Gi's made to differentiate.
If you never said otherwise then stop arguing against it.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Not Akuma's ending you fruit loop.
Yes it is.
Originally posted by Classic NES
How would I know if you claimed I did not post any of Regular Gouki's Aura not even once. Even though I posted it in both the sprites and portraits?
I said none with the same aura as Shin Gouki.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Bad quoting again, you forget all the post mentioning how you didn't see other colors in the games and me posting the sprites [B] to show the other colors. [/B]
That's not the point. You said that I was commenting on the purple aura when I said "it's still on his back", even though I wasn't and those quotes were to prove it to you.
Also, don't try to bring other people into the argument.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Nah, it's a lie and notice how you cannot prove it.
You mean how you forgot I posted the pic of Gouki regular Aura covering his body than claim I did not once post it when I posted it twice and then claim you were aware of one of the pic?
Originally posted by SmashBro
Not the same aura as Shin AkumaAnd for my comment you called a lie:
How the f*ck is it not the same when you claimed that it was and that's the start of the argument?
Also, you posted that comment in response to this comment I made:
Originally posted by Classic NES
Considering that you haven't conceded any of your enernous points, I don't see how your claiming that you aren't afraid.
And you respond:
Originally posted by SmashBro
Maybe because I'm not and maybe because people don't make the same mistakes just because you made it.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You once again ignored what I said.
What you say makes no sense and nice job avoiding the question. How could you have known about the Second illustration if I did not even post an illustration of regular Gouki's aura covering his body once according to you?
Originally posted by SmashBro
You're so whack, it's pitiful.
And, your liar now. Once again: How could you have known about the Second illustration if I did not even post an illustration of regular Gouki's aura covering his body once according to you?
Originally posted by SmashBro
Then tell me what they were addressing?
I already told you in a previous post, click [post] to see your dumb quotes:
Originally posted by Classic NES
Why would you post two post from two completely different pages with no connection?I was reffering tot he post you made in refrence to your first question.
Remember this:
So, how did you come to this:
What contradiction was mention in relation that post about the original question? Your the one who brought up the word contradiction when we were talking about the original question. The contradiction that you just quoted has to do with you accepting that the aura covers his body and not accepting it in one post. Not the original question which is why I asked "What contradiction?"
Why would you mention a contradiction and quote me mentioning contradiction on a different issue when it was even mention in context to what I was talking about I.G. the oringal question?
Stop smoking drugs smashbros.
Originally posted by SmashBroI said FOLLOWED UP, meaning your quote came after what you said. I never said that you didn't say the other part. Work on your reading comprehension.
And I was talking about his Card Fighters pic.
You quoted part of it and ignored the main to twist the argument into this strawman:
Originally posted by SmashBroNo, I'm not. It's basically "if you're talking about this, then you're big tard". Just whining.
Why didn't you just specify which illustration when I initially asked instead of calling it whining when you clearly did not you tard?
Originally posted by SmashBroIf you never said otherwise then stop arguing against it.
So, you agree that the Gi's do not match the Aura's then. Because if the Gi's are used to differentiate between Shin and regular Gouki and the Gi in the ending we are arguing [Alpha 2 Ryu] has regular Gouki's Gi. And, if the Aura's are so inconsistent that they do not indicate anything. You initial point about his aura in the ending [Alpha 2 Ryu] is wrong.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Yes it is.
So, Akuma has a purple aura in his ending? Okay, please post it even though I already did.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I said none with the same aura as Shin Gouki.
You said this:
Originally posted by SmashBro
Yet you have not once posted regular Akuma with that same aura so don't even go that stupid route.
Originally posted by SmashBro
That's not the point. You said that I was commenting on the purple aura when I said "it's still on his back", even though I wasn't and those quotes were to prove it to you.
I said you quoted the wrong Aura tard and it contradicted. I also said it could be a mistake or that your a tard. But, since you are a tard I doubt it was a mistake. . .I could be wrong, which one is it?
Originally posted by Classic NES
You mean how you forgot I posted the pic of Gouki regular Aura covering his body than claim I did not once post it when I posted it twice and then claim you were aware of one of the pic?
I didn't "forget", I just didn't notice it. And you already posted that SF2Alpha ending befoer, that's why I said I was aware of that but that was still a different case, as I was referring to portraits since you had mostly Shin Akuma pics.
Originally posted by Classic NES
How the f*ck is it not the same when you claimed that it was and that's the start of the argument?[B]
No I didn't. What are you talking about? The whole point was whether they were different or not.
Originally posted by Classic NES
[B]Also, you posted that comment in response to this comment I made:And you respond:
The "Maybe I'm not" comment was a response to you claiming that I was afraid of admitting to being wrong. Pay attention.
Originally posted by Classic NES
What you say makes no sense and nice job avoiding the question. How could you have known about the Second illustration if I did not even post an illustration of regular Gouki's aura covering his body once according to you?
Look at my first comment. And again I'll repeat what I said:
"Read what I said again; I said you didn't post Gouki with the same aura as Shin Gouki."
Originally posted by Classic NES
And, your liar now. Once again: How could you have known about the Second illustration if I did not even post an illustration of regular Gouki's aura covering his body once according to you?
And again look at my first comment.
Originally posted by Classic NES
I already told you in a previous post, click [post] to see your dumb quotes:
Go back and actually read where it all started from. It came from:
Originally posted by Classic NES
Also, this is proves your not paying attention mack:Was in response to my post on sprites despite the fact I posted this :
*snip*
Nevermind this contradiction:
And combined with the fact that you notice the ending and the fact that they are both his Aura's from the same game just in different instances is silly.
Read from there and you'll see that's where it all started from, thus, it all connects.
Originally posted by Classic NES
You quoted part of it and ignored the main to twist the argument into this strawman:
I didn't ignore squat. That's exactly how you were responding.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Why didn't you just specify which illustration when I initially asked instead of calling it whining when you clearly did not you tard?
Because you were whining and I was just pointing that out. Instead of just giving me a straight question, you resorting to something pointless and ridiculous.
Originally posted by Classic NES
So, you agree that the Gi's do not match the Aura's then. Because if the Gi's are used to differentiate between Shin and regular Gouki and the Gi in the ending we are arguing [Alpha 2 Ryu] has regular Gouki's Gi. And, if the Aura's are so inconsistent that they do not indicate anything. You initial point about his aura in the ending [Alpha 2 Ryu] is wrong.
I never said the Gi's matched the Aura in the first place. You were the one who kept bringing it up. And since it was glowing around his body, it should indicate something. And my point about his aura in the ending is right.
Originally posted by Classic NES
So, Akuma has a purple aura in his ending? Okay, please post it even though I already did.
http://www.vgmuseum.com/end/arcade/a/sfa2aku.htm
You said Shin Akuma's aura was mix between purple and red, remember?
Originally posted by Classic NES
You said this:
And it's right there in your face:
"Yet you have not once posted regular Akuma with that same aura so don't even go that stupid route."
Originally posted by Classic NES
I said you quoted the wrong Aura and it contradicted. I also said it could be a mistake or that your a tard. But, since you are a tard I doubt it was a mistake. . .I could be wrong, which one is it?
Neither because I didn't quote the wrong Aura. And I explained this several times already. It's clear you're just ignoring what I'm saying, therefore, I don't think I need to go any further.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I didn't "forget", I just didn't notice it. And you already posted that SF2Alpha ending befoer, that's why I said I was aware of that but that was still a different case, as I was referring to portraits since you had mostly Shin Akuma pics.
You gotta pay attention mack. I posted a pic of regular Gouki with an Aura around his body.
Originally posted by SmashBro
No I didn't. What are you talking about? The whole point was whether they were different or not.
You said that the aura Gouki had on when he sunk the island when he was Shin Gouki:
Originally posted by SmashBro
He had that aura glowing around him.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Not that pink looking one he had before he punched the ground. Usually he's seen with a red one.
Originally posted by SmashBroWell even though it's non-canon, Shin-Akuma had pinkish looking around him in CvsS 2.
The color was purple not pink Btw, but anyway the aura color was the same, but the Aura like i said sooo many times is inconsistent.
Originally posted by SmashBro
The "Maybe I'm not" comment was a response to you claiming that I was afraid of admitting to being wrong. Pay attention.
It's: "Maybe [color=red[because[/color] I'm not" you can't even quote yourself properly. Also, the post pointed out that you have not admitted you were wrong And that your afraid to admitt it. . .Another strawman.
Originally posted by SmashBroLook at my first comment. And again I'll repeat what I said:
"Read what I said again; I said you didn't post Gouki with the same aura as Shin Gouki."
And again look at my first comment.
Despite the fact I did in regards to the way it covered his entire body not color. Since you kept arguing that the red aura's were on his back when they covered his body. As for the color I handled that already, the purple Aura can't mean much since it's on regular Gouki based on the color of his Gi. Even you agree'd that the color of the Gi's help the players differentiate. So, I you cannot possibly argue that it's Shin Gouki if it has the wrong color Gi.
Originally posted by SmashBroGo back and actually read where it all started from. It came from:
Read from there and you'll see that's where it all started from, thus, it all connects.
I see my post owning you nothing more.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I didn't ignore squat. That's exactly how you were responding.
You left out where you just responded to me asking you about which illustration with a one liner about whining which I just quoted tard.
Originally posted by SmashBroBecause you were whining and I was just pointing that out. Instead of just giving me a straight question, you resorting to something pointless and ridiculous.
So, you counter by ignoring the question completely and claiming that it was just whining?
Originally posted by SmashBro
I never said the Gi's matched the Aura in the first place. You were the one who kept bringing it up. And since it was glowing around his body, it should indicate something. And my point about his aura in the ending is right.
The aura's are inconsistent in the fact they cover different version of Gouki. You can tell they are different by the Gi's like we agree'd on.
