Thor & Wonder Woman vs Thanos

Originally posted by fangirl101
This is Out and OUt a lie. Wondy has blitzed The god of war Ares. She's Blitzed Amazo. And she's blitzed the general and konvict with Superman. Next. everything else i don't care about. Just getting you together on wonder woman which you obsiously don't read with your REDICULOUS statements.

Fangirl, weve bin over this b4. If u can show me scans of wonderwoman doing this, i will immediately change my stance on wonderwomans battle speed. Becuase im certainly not going to take ur word for it without seeing scans and context of the scans.

Read Wondy's respect thread. She has the feats. it's Thanos who has no speed feats and almost no reaction feats.

Originally posted by fangirl101
I dont' address pure ingnorance. He's obviously arguing out of a fanboy state of mind. I'm arguing logic and actual feats. Just arguing that wondy is a million times stronger than thor means nothing to me. I know to not be true so why address that? That is blindly obvious. But what isn't obvious is that tards would actually think that wondy has never blitzed anyone.

. LOL at u calling ANYONE a retard. Ive repeatedly asked u for scans showing me this and u have provided more out of context and irrelevant scans than i can count. Hence the reason im very reluctant to take ur word for it. Insults coming from someone who considers Wonderwoman ramming into an opponent a speedblitz? Being called a retard by someone who considers wonderwoman tagging an opponent as a speedblitz? Shall i continue to name ur ABYSMAL and laughable past attempts at showing wonderwoman speedblitzing?.LOL 😂 . If u can provide scans of wonderwoman initiating numerous superfast attacks against an opponent then i will gladly change my stance but so far uve only been able to show ur blatant inability to interpret whats on panel.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
. LOL at u calling ANYONE a retard. Ive repeatedly asked u for scans showing me this and u have provided more out of context and irrelevant scans than i can count. Hence the reason im very reluctant to take ur word for it. Insults coming from someone who considers Wonderwoman ramming into an opponent a speedblitz? Being called a retard by someone who considers wonderwoman tagging an opponent as a speedblitz? Shall i continue to name ur ABYSMAL and laughable past attempts at showing wonderwoman speedblitzing?.LOL 😂 . If u can provide scans of wonderwoman initiating numerous superfast attacks against an opponent then i will gladly change my stance but so far uve only been able to show ur blatant inability to interpret whats on panel.

Originally posted by fangirl101
are you dense? a speed blitz is not numerous attacks. A speed blitz is moving before your opponent can react. Superman blitzed Amazo. And then promptly got attacked back. Please learn to debate comics.

if so then speedblitzing would fail on thanos...just like sentrys failed on hulk

Originally posted by fangirl101
are you dense? a speed blitz is not numerous attacks. A speed blitz is moving before your opponent can react. Superman blitzed Amazo. And then promptly got attacked back. Please learn to debate comics.

....Hmmmm. When people say superman speedblitz for da win, what do they normally mean? Superman hitting an opponent multiple times b4 the opponent can react. The same goes for the flash and all other characters who normally blitz in comics. Going by how the term is normally used on this forum, blitzing is not just getting a quick hit in on ur opponent b4 they can react but is a continuous action. What ur describing is closer to how the term "bullrush" is used. LOL at the pathetic insult attempts.

So fangirl, do u consider what sentry did against WWH a "speedblitz"? Going by ur definition the hulk was able to defend against an attempted speedblitz from a FTL character right?

Going by fangirl definition of a speed blitz it's hiting an opponent first and quickly but only once. LOL as that being a definition of speed blitz when clearly on this forum it's considered hiting an opponent multiple times before they can react back.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
So fangirl, do u consider what sentry did against WWH a "speedblitz"? Going by ur definition the hulk was able to defend against an attempted speedblitz from a FTL character right?

Yes, Sentry attempted a blitz......unfortunately, not only was the speed ambiguous, but the blitz was pathetic as well. And Sentry is not FTL.

It was however a blitz. A shitty blitz, but a blitz nonetheless.

A bullrush is also considered a blitz under forum rules, it's just that popular opinion is that a blitz is a sustained attack at high speed.

And the only times I can recall Thanos being blitzed, are Fallen One and Runner. Fallen One has practically no feats and tried a shitty blitz right at Thanos. As for Runner......well, we saw how that worked. 😛

There is no way you can compare the Runner's speed to WW.

Originally posted by tdazz
There is no way you can compare Thanos's speed to WW.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Yes, Sentry attempted a blitz......unfortunately, not only was the speed ambiguous, but the blitz was pathetic as well. And Sentry is not FTL.

It was however a blitz. A shitty blitz, but a blitz nonetheless.

A bullrush is also considered a blitz under forum rules, it's just that popular opinion is that a blitz is a sustained attack at high speed.

And the only times I can recall Thanos being blitzed, are Fallen One and Runner. Fallen One has practically no feats and tried a shitty blitz right at Thanos. As for Runner......well, we saw how that worked. 😛

Dude as u hve said a speedblitz is considered by most on this forum to be a sustained attack at high speed. Hence i know a lot of people on this forum who wud disagree and argue vehemently against anyone calling what sentry did against WWH a speedblitz including myself. On this forum ther is usually quite a clear distinxtion between a speedblitz and a bullrush. Also the sentrys speed might hve been ambiguous but so are the speeds of most comic characters who attempt such manoeuvres. Also i dont see what was so pathetic about it if we are to consider that an attempted blitz. The sentry also does have feats that put him at FTL.

As for the thanos examples, Lots of people dont consider what fallen one attempted against thanos a blitz but if we r to consider it as a blitz then i dont know whats so shitty about that either because about evry Big G herald can move faster than light and although fallen one charged right in at thanos,blitzing by ur definition has to do with simply tagging an opponent before they can react so heading straight towards thanos shouldnt matter.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
....Hmmmm. When people say superman speedblitz for da win, what do they normally mean? Superman hitting an opponent multiple times b4 the opponent can react. The same goes for the flash and all other characters who normally blitz in comics. Going by how the term is normally used on this forum, blitzing is not just getting a quick hit in on ur opponent b4 they can react but is a continuous action. What ur describing is closer to how the term "bullrush" is used. LOL at the pathetic insult attempts.

considered. Opinion is not fact. Sentry has no FTL feats.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Yes, Sentry attempted a blitz......unfortunately, not only was the speed ambiguous, but the blitz was pathetic as well. And Sentry is not FTL.

It was however a blitz. A shitty blitz, but a blitz nonetheless.

A bullrush is also considered a blitz under forum rules, it's just that popular opinion is that a blitz is a sustained attack at high speed.

And the only times I can recall Thanos being blitzed, are Fallen One and Runner. Fallen One has practically no feats and tried a shitty blitz right at Thanos. As for Runner......well, we saw how that worked. 😛

sentry is FTL...just his blitz was not

and for fallen one, u cant just call it shit because thanos stopped it

Originally posted by bbrem123
sentry is FTL...just his blitz was not

and for fallen one, u cant just call it shit because thanos stopped it

Originally posted by Philosophía

Except that he consistantly has no problem tagging Heralds who all move much, much faster than WW. But I guess we can ignore that huh.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
considered. Opinion is not fact. Sentry has no FTL feats.

sentry has gone to both the sun and saturn in a few seconds

Originally posted by tdazz
Except that he consistantly has no problem tagging Heralds who all move much, much faster than WW. But I guess we can ignore that huh.

Originally posted by tdazz
Except that he consistantly has no problem tagging Heralds who all move much, much faster than WW. But I guess we can ignore that huh.

Lulz at this argument.

Okay. Show me an instance of Thanos displaying combat speed beyond WW's.