Originally posted by Philosophía
Lulz at this argument.Okay. Show me an instance of Thanos showing combat speed beyond WW's.
What's to laugh at? The fact he is able to hit people who move faster than light. 😛
For a whole page of people claiming WW can speed blitz there hasn't been one instance shown so why should I bother?
Originally posted by TricksterPriest
considered. Opinion is not fact. Sentry has no FTL feats.
On issues like this, All we have are opinions. U r of the opinion that blitzes r not sustained attack while by ur own admission most people on this forum arent. Im sure that evn u have used the superman speedblitz arguement. Can u truthfully say that u did not mean superman hitting the opponent numerous times?
Originally posted by fangirl101
Um, Thanos tags the surfer who never uses battle speeds. why else would he rush rightin to thanos blast. he never evades them. has any herald actually used thier brains? Hell, Thor has blocked thanos blast but a herald doesn't have the sense to move of the damned way. Please. now. stop.
No thank you
Originally posted by fangirl101
Um, Thanos tags the surfer who never uses battle speeds. why else would he rush rightin to thanos blast. he never evades them. has any herald actually used thier brains? Hell, Thor has blocked thanos blast but a herald doesn't have the sense to move of the damned way. Please. now. stop.
so now its bad comicbook writing??
Originally posted by tdazz
Well said.
You actually expect me to prove to you that Wonder Woman can speedblitz ? It's pretty obvious that you know very little about the character, so what would be the point ?
The best debates are the ones where the debaters are versed in both the characters that they argue for, aswell as the one they argue against.
Originally posted by Philosophía
You actually expect me to prove to you that Wonder Woman can speedblitz ? It's pretty obvious that you know very little about the character, so what would be the point ?The best debates are the ones where the debaters are versed in both the characters that they argue for, aswell as the one they argue against.
what would be the point?...maybe to prove somebody wrong and win an argument
Originally posted by Philosophía
You actually expect me to prove to you that Wonder Woman can speedblitz ? It's pretty obvious that you know very little about the character, so what would be the point ?The best debates are the ones where the debaters are versed in both the characters that they argue for, aswell as the one they argue against.
Actually yes. If someone says a character can do something and a whole page of people dispute it and ask for proof it would be nice if you did prove it.
It's obvious you know very little about Thanos if you think WW can speedblitz him. And even if she could it wouldn't hurt him as this guy stands up to blasts from Odin, Tyrant, Surfer, Thor, etc.
But where Odin and Gungnir failed to land a KO, WW and her speedblitz will? 😆
Originally posted by tdazz
Actually yes. If someone says a character can do something and a whole page of people dispute it and ask for proof it would be nice if you did prove it.It's obvious you know very little about Thanos if you think WW can speedblitz him. And even if she could it wouldn't hurt him as this guy stands up to blasts from Odin, Tyrant, Surfer, Thor, etc.
But where Odin and Gungnir failed to land a KO, WW and her speedblitz will? 😆
Really the attempts by wonderwoman supporters to prove she can speedblitz have bin nothing short of laughable. From those who simply refuse to prove it probably because they cant. to those who attempted to use a different definiton for speedblitzing due to there inability to show any proof in regards to the definition that as normally used. Proving ur case is required in any argument. If i say hulk can knock supermans head off, I have to show relevant feats to prove it. Same way if i say wonderwoman can speedblitz an opponent i have to provide some proof of it. The burden of proof is always on the person making the assertion.
This blatant dodging is even more laughable considering that this is a forum where there is believed to be a clear line between, having speed in direct battle confrontation with others and having speed out of such battle situations. The validity of the speedblitz tactic can and has been debated for almost evry superfast character aside probably the flash. Wonderwoman fans expecting people to take their word for it that wonderwoman can speedblitz without providing any hard evidence is just an example of ridiculous debating.
My challenge still stands, Someone pls show scans of wonderwoman initiating numerous superfast attacks against an opponent. This will prove that she has this ability and end this argument. Until then, Wonderwoman speedblitzing anyone is not a valid tactic.
Originally posted by ultimatethor
Really the attempts by wonderwoman supporters to prove she can speedblitz have bin nothing short of laughable. From those who simply refuse to prove it probably because they cant. to those who attempted to use a different definiton for speedblitzing due to there inability to show any proof in regards to the definition that as normally used. Proving ur case is required in any argument. If i say hulk can knock supermans head off, I have to show relevant feats to prove it. Same way if i say wonderwoman can speedblitz an opponent i have to provide some proof of it. The burden of proof is always on the person making the assertion.This blatant dodging is even more laughable considering that this is a forum where there is believed to be a clear line between, having speed in direct battle confrontation with others and having speed out of such battle situations. The validity of the speedblitz tactic can and has been debated for almost evry superfast character aside probably the flash. Wonderwoman fans expecting people to take their word for it that wonderwoman can speedblitz without providing any hard evidence is just an example of ridiculous debating.
My challenge still stands, Someone pls show scans of wonderwoman initiating numerous superfast attacks against an opponent. This will prove that she has this ability and end this argument. Until then, Wonderwoman speedblitzing anyone is not a valid tactic.
Originally posted by fangirl101
Wonder Woman routinely returns fire with her bracers. Which would be counter ATTACKS. She moves her wrist at FTL speeds when she blocks. She was recently shown reflecting rapid fire heat vision from amazo.
Did u see the last part of my post? Examples of wonderwoman INITIATING NUMEROUS SUPERFAST ATTACKS AGAINST AN OPPONENT. None of what u just said any way matches the criteria. Maybe i shouldve just said show me an example of Wonderwoman actually blitzing an opponent.