Originally posted by Gideon
"They" being Illustrious, Janus, ect.
Ah, I see. It would appear I need to get some rest then, sorry.
What exactly is the statement regarding Exar Kun's dark side knowledge?
As according to the Jedi Academy Sourcebook, page 50:
"The dark knowledge of the Sith teachings died with Kun...(keep in mind, even Lord Vader, himself a Dark Lord of the Sith, did not know all there is to know of the Sith powers)".
All that he learned from Naga Sadow is available to Palpatine.
Hardly. You would have to prove the lore contained within Sadow's private notes existed elsewhere, which would be difficult considering how it's also said that it's extremely unlikely that records survive elsewhere.
Still, I suppose my overall point is that Palpatine's knowledge of the Force is the greatest and broadest we have seen in canon. Which it is.
And I definitely don't have any reason to question that; it's merely the assumption that Sidious was so über he magically secured knowledge of every technique ever to exist. There are numerous reasons to doubt such, as I've already listed in previous posts.
@ Lightsnake:
think the 'they' was Janus and Illustrious. And things such as?
Things such as entire planets, like Malachor V, which carried some importance if we follow Sion's or Kreia's dialogue.
Given the number of Sith Holocrons brought in constantly and created by later Sith, it'd seem far less was lost than was originally thought
But that's not to say that some things weren't destroyed or lost or even undiscovered.
What was available to him was apparently pretty extensive. He had Bane's Holocron by ROTS, consisting of Belia Darzu's, Freedon Nadd's and by extension Naga Sadow's and Revan's, very likely Andeddu's and Nihilus's, access to the spirits of Korriban, and probably a significant amount of others. By Complete Locations, many 'art' pieces in his office are really Sith artifacts and the like and he'[s spent a long time acquiring things of the nature...given his age by AOTC, even, his collection could be extensive.
I'm not arguing he didn't possess a vast amount of lore or artifacts, just that there's absolutely no way everything survived for some thousands of years.
All? Probably not. A very vast deal of it? Another story
^
I have submitted as much, but Sidious securing every single last technique is what my entire point is all about. As such, you're pretty much acknowledging it as valid.
It died with him then, sure, but Jedi vs. Sith seemed to introduce that Palpatine was aware of Kun's knpowledge given that he'd have learned Sadow's knowledge via either other Holocrons, Bane's Holocron, etc.
Originally posted by Advent
Which is written under a section entitled "Sith Alchemy". It stands to reason that it was referring to Naga Sadow's alchemical knowledge, which is supported by Sidious' own appendum. How does this account for the private notes he left on Yavin IV (notice that it's never stated where he secured this holocron)? It doesn't.One could also point out that it's well known that Kun and Nadd learned from Sadow, but he never specifically states that what the secrets they had learned and the ones contained in the holocron were the same. Sidious merely asserts that he'll keep what he gathered secret. Therefore, there would be no contradictions between the JA Sourcebook and JvS.
^ There's no arguing around that, despite what you might be inclined to say. In addition, can you provide proof Bane had access to Sadow's virtual treasure trove on Yavin IV? I don't seem to recall this specifically being mentioned.
And it doesn't seem to just be referencing alchemical knowledge, either, given mention of Nadd.
I find it quite ridiculous to believe that Freedon Nadd knew absolutely nothing of Sith alchemy. After all, Nadd directed Kun to Yavin IV and he [Nadd] went there himself and was the first to uncover Sadow's teachings. Why would he just have learned Sith magic, but completely disregard the rest?
It's a bit unfair to say that the DE sourcebook is out of date there, but not the JA Sourcebook which is also pretty dated.
I'm well aware of that fact. However, later canon doesn't have to conform to earlier entries - it's quite the opposite, in fact.