Originally posted by Schecter
yes bardock, spend the next hour compiling irrefutable evidence so that it will be swiftly ignored and danced around. what more incentive to you need?
Right, because it would take an hour to do that, wouldn't?
Maybe you both should spend more time getting your jollies in a different way?
Maybe?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Go suck an exhaust.
"Go suck and exhaust PIPE", maybe?
Originally posted by dadudemonWe probably should. But at least we aren't spending our time trolling. Either way, I don't need to give you names (deluded as you are you'll put out a hit on the people I name), it doesn't change the fact that you are mindlessly trolling as well as you being absolutely unaware of your multiple shortcomings. But **** it, could we please talk about this stupid ****ing act again, as I tried to earlier in this thread before you trolled around.
Right, because it would take an hour to do that, wouldn't?Maybe you both should spend more time getting your jollies in a different way?
Maybe?
"Go suck and exhaust PIPE", maybe?
Oh, so you got it? Seems as if my omission was well chosen.
Originally posted by Bardock42
We probably should. But at least we aren't spending our time trolling.
You should. Also, you two constantly harass and troll on these boards. Calling me a troll because I wouldn't bite into you first argument and then I showed you rather quickly why you were arguing for the sake of arguing and failing, is not trolling. It's the opposite. I know you get bored sometimes. It's okay. Just don't take your boredem out on the boards.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Either way, I don't need to give you names (deluded as you are you'll put out a hit on the people I name),
You certainly need to back up your trolling when you say stuff like "Yeah, me and everyone else that thinks you are a ****."
You know that's not true. It's a very few and select group that can fit on one hand. 😐
You were just trolling again. I know you didn't think it would cause my world to come crashing down on me because you though it was a true earth shattering revelation.
Originally posted by Bardock42
it doesn't change the fact that you are mindlessly trolling
Who's delusional now?
Originally posted by Bardock42
as well as you being absolutely unaware of your multiple shortcomings.
Right, because I said I was a perfect angel in seriousness. 😉
Originally posted by Bardock42
But **** it, could we please talk about this stupid ****ing act again, as I tried to earlier in this thread before you trolled around.
Wrong. You tried arguing about nothing for the sake of arguing. That's what you do. I forgive you for it.
I've brought up a very nice argument for the anti-ESA peeps. Shouldn't that be a nice starting point?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh, so you got it? Seems as if my omission was well chosen.
Sure I could take a stab and guess what you were saying. Doesn't change the fact that "go suck an exhaust" is missing the necessary noun. The next time you hear an English* say that, let me know.
*Yes, it's supposed to say "English speaker".
Originally posted by dadudemon
You should. Also, you two constantly harass and troll on these boards. Calling me a troll because I wouldn't bite into you first argument and then I showed you rather quickly why you were arguing for the sake of arguing and failing, is not trolling. It's the opposite. I know you get bored sometimes. It's okay. Just don't take your boredem out on the boards.
Delusional.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You certainly need to back up your trolling when you say stuff like "Yeah, me and everyone else that thinks you are a ****."
Nah.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You know that's not true. It's a very few and select group that can fit on one hand. 😐
Nah
Originally posted by dadudemon
You were just trolling again. I know you didn't think it would cause my world to come crashing down on me because you though it was a true earth shattering revelation.
Nah
Originally posted by dadudemon
Who's delusional now?
You.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Right, because I said I was a perfect angel in seriousness. 😉
Point in case.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Wrong. You tried arguing about nothing for the sake of arguing. That's what you do. I forgive you for it.
Nah.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I've brought up a very nice argument for the anti-ESA peeps. Shouldn't that be a nice starting point?
Where.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Sure I could take a stab and guess what you were saying. Doesn't change the fact that "go suck an exhaust" is missing the necessary noun. The next time you hear an English* say that, let me know.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/exhaust
Originally posted by dadudemon
*Yes, it's supposed to say "English speaker".
Sad.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You clearly don't understand how ellipses works, at all.
I know how to use them, when to use them, and I use them. I explained why they cannot be grammatically correct in the OTF as well.
Remember?
ZOMG, I just used an ellipsis.
Do you REALLY hear people say "suck an exhaust"? Which was my point.
And, no, I don't go around correcting people like that, just Bardock.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Delusional.Nah.
Nah
Nah
You.
Point in case.
Nah.
Where.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/exhaust
Sad.
Yah, to everyone of your "nahs". 😛
"Point in case." I don't know how you could miss the sarcasm two time in a row.
"Where." You'll figure it out, I'm sure.
I know it's "Sad." that you criticise others for their posts but can't handle being criticized. No definition will change your awkward mistake. You already admitted that it was supposed to be "pipe". No amount of "machinery" definitions can change that. 😄
Originally posted by dadudemonWhat exactly gave you the impression that I can't handle being criticized? Just the fact that I don't agree with your assessment?
I know how to use them, when to use them, and I use them. I explained why they cannot be grammatically correct in the OTF as well.Remember?
ZOMG, I just used an ellipsis.
Do you REALLY hear people say "suck an exhaust"? Which was my point.
And, no, I don't go around correcting people like that, just Bardock.
Yah, to everyone of your "nahs". 😛
"Point in case." I don't know how you could miss the sarcasm two time in a row.
"Where." You'll figure it out, I'm sure.
I know it's "Sad." that you criticise others for their posts but can't handle being criticized. No definition will change your awkward mistake. You already admitted that it was supposed to be "pipe". No amount of "machinery" definitions can change that. 😄
I still think that there shouldn't be legislation about endangered species. Can you tell me why there should be?
Originally posted by dadudemon
I know how to use them, when to use them, and I use them. I explained why they cannot be grammatically correct in the OTF as well.
No, I never read any such revolutionary post.
Ellipses can be grammatically incorrect, however, I've never seen Bardock use it as such. The fact is that you seem to regard it as a fundamental error whenever it's used. Well, whenever it's used by someone you dislike.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
No, I never read any such revolutionary post.
Use the search feature. It was in the OTF...picture thread, I think.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Ellipses can be grammatically incorrect, however, I've never seen Bardock use it as such.
You don't understand ellipses, then. Usually when you use an ellipsis, it is incorrect English. Bardock is a big offender of this. He knows this. You can't run around eliminating ESSENTIAL portions of a sentence.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
The fact is that you seem to regard it as a fundamental error whenever it's used.
I don't regard it as a fundamental error...just a rubbish way of posting. It works fine in a conversation when voice inflection and body language can be used.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Well, whenever it's used by someone you dislike.
I don't dislike Bardock, nor do I dislike Tattoo.
Originally posted by dadudemonI smell conrtradiction.
You don't understand ellipses, then. Usually when you use an ellipsis, it is incorrect English. Bardock is a big offender of this. He knows this. You can't run around eliminating ESSENTIAL portions of a sentence...I don't regard it as a fundamental error...