FP Tyrant vs. SC Anti-Monitor

Started by fangirl10112 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your saying Thanos of titan the guy who cloned Galactus,was wrong about a particular event that he saw at Tyrant's place. What leads you to believe Thanos was incorrect here?

Thanos Never saw a galaxy destroyed. Ever. he only speculated that galaxies must have been destroyed. And then we have no reference for how long it took. Did Tyrant One shot a galaxy? Likely not. Did he destroy a galaxy on his own or in combination of power released with Galactus? No one has shown one feat of this fully powered tyrant. that is the fist thing.

Originally posted by fangirl101
So,because galaxies might not have been destroyed this means Sc Monitor wins? Explain.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So,because galaxies might not have been destroyed this means Sc Monitor wins? Explain.

I haven't given a winner in this battle. what i've done is said that there is no proof that that any galaxies where destroyed. there is also no proof that either of them destroyed the galaxy in a single blast. Nor is there any proof of tyrants ability to with stand the AM wave if directed at him. Everyone was giving tyrant the victory based purely on marvel blind fanboyism.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Thanos Never saw a galaxy destroyed. Ever. he only speculated that galaxies must have been destroyed. And then we have no reference for how long it took. Did Tyrant One shot a galaxy? Likely not. Did he destroy a galaxy on his own or in combination of power released with Galactus? No one has shown one feat of this fully powered tyrant. that is the fist thing.
So,are you saying that this full powered Tyrant lacked the power to defeat sc Am?

Really?

Originally posted by fangirl101
I haven't given a winner in this battle. what i've done is said that there is no proof that that any galaxies where destroyed. there is also no proof that either of them destroyed the galaxy in a single blast. Nor is there any proof of tyrants ability to with stand the AM wave if directed at him. Everyone was giving tyrant the victory based purely on marvel blind fanboyism.
So,even though you dont disgaree and if so,havent said so at this point. Everyone who gave Tyrant the win is a marvel fanboy? I think the think Tyrant beats Am and this has nothing to do with personal bias but rather their opinion on who wins this matchup.

Originally posted by fangirl101
I haven't given a winner in this battle. what i've done is said that there is no proof that that any galaxies where destroyed. there is also no proof that either of them destroyed the galaxy in a single blast. Nor is there any proof of tyrants ability to with stand the AM wave if directed at him. Everyone was giving tyrant the victory based purely on marvel blind fanboyism.
Don’t listen to those god dam marvel fanboys

Pay attention to what the AM is going. He's feeding on New Earth and the World's Born from it.

Originally posted by fangirl101
I haven't given a winner in this battle.

"Tyrant stands NO chance." those are you words are they not?

Just a question. Has Salaak ever witnessed a power battery exploding?

Because if not his statement of the power of that explosion is just as speculatory as Thanos' statement.

Originally posted by tdazz
Just a question. Has Salaak ever witnessed a power battery exploding?

Because if not his statement of the power of that explosion is just as speculatory as Thanos' statement.


It's not just a power battery, which we know how all the power of the corps, it's the warp core engine of war world itself as well.

Originally posted by Endrict Nuul
"Tyrant stands NO chance." those are you words are they not?

yeah. So. who cares. AM has feats that we can look at. Right now all we have is a scan from a computer showing galactus and tyrant in a fight. In which we know tyrant lost.

Originally posted by fangirl101
yeah. So. who cares. AM has feats that we can look at. Right now all we have is a scan from a computer showing galactus and tyrant in a fight. In which we know tyrant lost.
So do you think Sc Am would have beaten the Galactus that defeated fp Tyrant?

Originally posted by fangirl101
It's not just a power battery, which we know how all the power of the corps, it's the warp core engine of war world itself as well.

Thanks for the correction but that doesn't answer the question.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So do you think Sc Am would have beaten the Galactus that defeated fp Tyrant?

It doesn't matter if he would have beaten Galactus or not. tyrant isn't as powerful as Galactus and never was. So the point your trying to make is Moot.

Originally posted by tdazz
Thanks for the correction but that doesn't answer the question.

As i stated earlier, we have the gaurdians with thier highly advanced energy powers who can scan the engine and battery, and the corps who can also scan power signatures,( check trinity if you aren't reading it, john performed and energy scan), and can calculate the amount of power released.

Versus Thanos looking at a monitor telling a brief history of a being. Not readying any energy signatures, not showing how long the fight took place, nor if any galaxies were actually destroyed and if so, who destroyed what part? how long did it take to do so?

And then decide which is to be taken seriously.

Originally posted by fangirl101
It doesn't matter if he would have beaten Galactus or not. tyrant isn't as powerful as Galactus and never was. So the point your trying to make is Moot.

But how many times have we seen Galactus in such shape as against FP Tyrant?
Galactus always pretty much underestimates everyone, even if he isn't fed and still underestimates them, but not against FP Tyrant. He knew he must come in great shape to defeat him. Look how he battled him, like no one else.

Originally posted by Xplosive
But how many times have we seen Galactus in such shape as against FP Tyrant?
Galactus always pretty much underestimates everyone, even if he isn't fed and still underestimates them, but not against FP Tyrant. He knew he must come in great shape to defeat him. Look how he battled him, like no one else.

And tyrant still lost. They both fought over a time. Which means they both kept repowering themselves. What do you think would happen if galactus and the Am fought and the Am got ONE chance to repower himself? Hmm?

Galactus is stronger then SC Anti-Monitor, So Tyrant barely losing to Galactus doesn't help your case. And yes 2 people agree with you and how many know your wrong?

The only other times I have seen Galactus hurt like Tyrant hurt him was a very angry Phoenix Force and Ageis and Tenebrous, who were both as powerful as him and still had to cheap shot him to win.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
Galactus is stronger then SC Anti-Monitor, So Tyrant barely losing to Galactus doesn't help your case. And yes 2 people agree with you and how many know your wrong?

The only other times I have seen Galactus hurt like Tyrant hurt him was a very angry Phoenix Force and Ageis and Tenebrous, who were both as powerful as him and still had to cheap shot him to win.

There is no proof of Tyrant's power level. Odin can hurt galactus. and sustain a prolonged battle before he loses. You saying Galactus is stronger than SC monitor is just you saying that. there is no conclusive proof either way. Just marvel wanking.

Originally posted by fangirl101
As i stated earlier, we have the gaurdians with thier highly advanced energy powers who can scan the engine and battery, and the corps who can also scan power signatures,( check trinity if you aren't reading it, john performed and energy scan), and can calculate the amount of power released.

Versus Thanos looking at a monitor telling a brief history of a being. Not readying any energy signatures, not showing how long the fight took place, nor if any galaxies were actually destroyed and if so, who destroyed what part? how long did it take to do so?

And then decide which is to be taken seriously.

The same Thanos who's cloned Galactus, who knows how powerful Galactus is; heck the guy makes a living out of gaining more knowledge.

Secondly, Tyrant dealt more severe damage to Galactus than either Tenebrous or Aggamotto. His fight with Aggamotto was wrecking dimensions.

Thirdly, Surtur has wrecked a galaxy and he isn't on Galactus' level. Think about it. He destroyed a galaxy but he is only equal to Odin in a fight? But Tyrant and Galactus can't wreck galaxies in their fight? Because??? Hell, Seth and Odin were wrecking galaxies, and Seth is dogpoo compared to Tyrant.