FP Tyrant vs. SC Anti-Monitor

Originally posted by WhiteWitchKing
The same Thanos who's cloned Galactus, who knows how powerful Galactus is; heck the guy makes a living out of gaining more knowledge.

Secondly, Tyrant dealt more severe damage to Galactus than either Tenebrous or Aggamotto. His fight with Aggamotto was wrecking dimensions.

Thirdly, Surtur has wrecked a galaxy and he isn't on Galactus' level. Think about it. He destroyed a galaxy but he is only equal to Odin in a fight? But Tyrant and Galactus can't wreck galaxies in their fight? Because??? Hell, Seth and Odin were wrecking galaxies, and Seth is dogpoo compared to Tyrant.

Originally posted by fangirl101
There is no proof of Tyrant's power level. Odin can hurt galactus. and sustain a prolonged battle before he loses. You saying Galactus is stronger than SC monitor is just you saying that. there is no conclusive proof either way. Just marvel wanking.

And you DC wank, it has always been your habbit nvr.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
The only other times I have seen Galactus hurt like Tyrant hurt him was a very angry Phoenix Force and Ageis and Tenebrous, who were both as powerful as him and still had to cheap shot him to win.

I don't think he was in such shape against A and T as he was against FP Tyrant. I think he is above them in power level.

Originally posted by fangirl101
There is no proof of Tyrant's power level. Odin can hurt galactus. and sustain a prolonged battle before he loses. You saying Galactus is stronger than SC monitor is just you saying that. there is no conclusive proof either way. Just marvel wanking.

I don't think Odin could scratch Galactus that we have seen battle FP Tyrant and even Odin would be only an annoyance in such battle.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Prove it. Any of it.

We have, it just does no good with you.

It's like trying to debate with a wall here.

Originally posted by fangirl101
As i stated earlier, we have the gaurdians with thier highly advanced energy powers who can scan the engine and battery, and the corps who can also scan power signatures,( check trinity if you aren't reading it, john performed and energy scan), and can calculate the amount of power released.

Versus Thanos looking at a monitor telling a brief history of a being. Not readying any energy signatures, not showing how long the fight took place, nor if any galaxies were actually destroyed and if so, who destroyed what part? how long did it take to do so?

And then decide which is to be taken seriously.

Salaak was speculating, because did not ask the ring for an anaylisis of what the resulting explosion of a power battery, a warp core, and the destruction of the Anti-Monitor would cause. He got a call from John telling him the plan and while fighting SC members he told them it would destroy the milky way. No discussion with the ring, no asking of a Guardian, just Salaak stating that's what would happen.

Which is why I asked if he had witnessed this before, because that is the only way his statement is not speculation.

To dismiss Thanos' statement as speculation and then trying to pass off Salaak's speculation as fact is laughable.

To be honest you have to either take both seriously or neither. You can't have it both ways.

Originally posted by fangirl101
It doesn't matter if he would have beaten Galactus or not. tyrant isn't as powerful as Galactus and never was. So the point your trying to make is Moot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes,the point is though he stood up to Galactus and I dont think sc Am could. Tyrant is powerful enough to beat sc Am.

More than.

Originally posted by tdazz
Salaak was speculating, because did not ask the ring for an anaylisis of what the resulting explosion of a power battery, a warp core, and the destruction of the Anti-Monitor would cause. He got a call from John telling him the plan and while fighting SC members he told them it would destroy the milky way. No discussion with the ring, no asking of a Guardian, just Salaak stating that's what would happen.

Which is why I asked if he had witnessed this before, because that is the only way his statement is not speculation.

To dismiss Thanos' statement as speculation and then trying to pass off Salaak's speculation as fact is laughable.

To be honest you have to either take both seriously or neither. You can't have it both ways.

Originally posted by tdazz
Salaak was speculating, because did not ask the ring for an anaylisis of what the resulting explosion of a power battery, a warp core, and the destruction of the Anti-Monitor would cause. He got a call from John telling him the plan and while fighting SC members he told them it would destroy the milky way. No discussion with the ring, no asking of a Guardian, just Salaak stating that's what would happen.

Which is why I asked if he had witnessed this before, because that is the only way his statement is not speculation.

To dismiss Thanos' statement as speculation and then trying to pass off Salaak's speculation as fact is laughable.

To be honest you have to either take both seriously or neither. You can't have it both ways.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
We have, it just does no good with you.

It's like trying to debate with a wall here.

Originally posted by fangirl101
I saw NO proof. None. Scans of the battle? How long did thier fight last? Was it a prolongued battle or One that was off and on again?

You saw nothing you wanted to accept, that's all.

Originally posted by Raoul
guys, if you arent going to cool it, the thread will be closed...

It seems either can't read or disregard posts.