Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
Speculating changes nothing. Do you honestly think Thanos was wrong or exaggerating?
Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
You need to start proving your case. All you do is shoot down other peoples post, calling for scans and proof yet I never see you proving your case. All you do is talk.
Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
Based on what? When has Tyrant ever been subdued by weak blasts?
Originally posted by fangirl101
Please go away. I proved my case. I stated everything that it Took to take Am down. And how he was literally torturing the ABSTRACT entity ion. I also stated how he survived even after all of that damage he took as well as his anti-matter wave that NOTHING could stop except to defeat him with extreme measures.
Okay that version of Ion did nothing of note compared to Classic Ion. Also there is no proof that outside of a host it had any impressive degree of power.
Plus Sinestro was able to rip it out of Kyle, are you now saying Sinestro is at SC Anti-Monitors level?
And in the past it has taken things like the Phoenix Force or two beings of equal power to Big G in order to bring Galactus down.
Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
Galactus punch = a weak blast? You stated Tyrants durability is no where near SC AM which suggests Tyrant has been taken down by weak blasts. When?
I stated that SC AM's durability is greater than FP Tyrant's...I can't see him surviving a galaxy destroying blast. Not at all. I mean, we saw a weakened Galactus' power in Annihilation when he got pissed and took out three solar systems. Can you see Tyrant standing next to him and surviving that blast? And 'galaxy destroying' > three solar systems.
I just can't see Tyrant tanking it. Can you? That's what my opinion is based on. I already gave Tyrant the edge in raw power over AM's SC incarnation. Just not durability.
EDIT:
And in the past it has taken things like the Phoenix Force or two beings of equal power to Big G in order to bring Galactus down
But Tyrant didn't take Galactus down. He lost.