Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Obviously this debate is going to go nowhere but in circles - the thing I tried to point out was the phrasing of your original post; it was so filled of patriarchal subtext, that I felt a need to point it out. You may not have meant it in that way, but that's how it appeared.
The other comment you were referring to was in slight jest. Also, it didn't directly mention a specific three letter word because I'm at work and the internet use is being passively monitored more closely. "Get with", in my book, means sleep with. Old people say "sleep with". It's so 80s and 90s. 😄
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I consider bringing culture up to be a bit silly.
Well, you shouldn't. Cultural mores have a large influence on culture. (LOL).
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
All that sticking with that culture does is encourage male dominance and inhibit change.
This is correct. But it doesn't address physiological reasons for "male boldness" now does it?
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
The fact is, that that culture is changing for the better - women are now free from scorn if they approach a man, drive a car, don't cook the meals - you know, all that stuff. Well, that's how it is where I am (the culture), I'm aware you're situated in the bible belt of the U.S, so it may well be different.
I'm glad, on many levels.
On that note, the lady can drive herself, pay for herself, get her own damn door, pay her own damn bills, etc......right? 😄
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Many of the girlfriends I've had have approached me, instead of waiting for me to approach them - and I am completely STD free.
Congrats on doing it properly. (lol, on both accounts.) There's no reason a dude can't hook up with a lady, same night, that SHE approaches him for lovins...but...uh, you probably shouldn't do that too often. Even with some wrappings, you're still pushin' your luck.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Why on earth would I go and punch a racist in the face?
Because racists suck???? I see nothing wrong with it.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Oh, you're referring to a joke I made in another thread, nice.
Indeed, homie. However, I'm inclined to believe my "joke" was less serious than yours. HA! NEEEEENARS!
Originally posted by inimalist
(and I agree, sterile is HOT)
Indeed. Anytime, anywhere, is quite nice. naughty
Originally posted by Bardock42
You aren't proving it. I told you, in her words, she doesn't ever want to have children.You saying she will, doesn't prove anything. It just makes you seem like a giant douche.
Great. Thanks for playing, Bardock42. Or should I call you.......
Marius!
AHA!
And my saying she probably will want to eventually, still leaves room for her static decision. Working in absolutes is lame, obviously.
A decade from now, she won't be so immature that she can't let go of ego and admit she wants children IF that's what she wants. Girls seem to be better and getting over their ego and changing their minds. Case in point: look how long we've been "arguing" about this? I know, I know, it's because I'm a douche and an idiot. Right. We've been over it already. You think "she doesn't want to have kids" equates to "she never wants to have kids". It doesn't. It's pretty simple. Es seht wie ein Mann hat in Dein Kopf geschißt, und hat umrühren vergessen.
This IS on topic. Do you need a straw?