ichigo vs goku

Started by Kirikaze Fuuma8 pages

I'd like to see it.

erk..i was talking about goku 😆

oh... 😆

Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
even Goku in saiyan saga has enough power to stand toe to toe with a planet buster.
Goku has never taken a planet busting attack, if he has, prove it. 🙂

He has never shown the strength or speed of Superman, and nowhere near the durability. 🙂

And Slaanesh, Broly movie is not canon to Goku, but for the average DBZ fanboy, terms such as "canon" are a bit above their general understanding. 🙂

goku one shot broly..and jaxx believe broly one shot a galaxy..so..goku one shot a galaxy buster..that's more that what superman ever did..but jaxx will porbbably say it's noncannon 😆

Originally posted by Slaanesh
goku one shot broly..and jaxx believe broly one shot a galaxy..so..goku one shot a galaxy buster..that's more that what superman ever did..but jaxx will porbbably say it's noncannon 😆
That's because it is noncanon you idiot.

And being able to bust a galaxy doesn't give you Superman's durability.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
And Slaanesh, Broly movie is not canon to Goku, but for the average DBZ fanboy, terms such as "canon" are a bit above their general understanding. 🙂

i know u would say that 😛

Vegeta wants to destroy earth when he used his garlic gun. and Goku wins when he clash his kamehameha to garlic gun. that alone proof that Goku has a potential to destroy one planet.

about Broly, I believe it still shows canon ability. no sign of differences between how they fought in movie and anime or even manga.

Because it isn't.

If the Broly movies are canon, how's about instead of just making random ignorant claims you PROVE it?

Broly one shot a galaxy, yeah.

But guess what?

Superman would beat him too.

Why?

Oh, because Broly is too weak, slow, and frail to be able to take Superman before he lights him up with punches and kills him(and Superman would register Broly as a threat similar to that of Doomsday, an uncontrollable monster, he WILL try to kill him).

Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
Vegeta wants to destroy earth when he used his garlic gun. and Goku wins when he clash his kamehameha to garlic gun. that alone proof that Goku has a potential to destroy one planet.

about Broly, I believe it still shows canon ability. no sign of differences between how they fought.

Did Vegeta in canon ever state he was going to destroy the planet, or just the dub, cause the dub is filled with errors in translation. Or just stupidity. And Vegeta can claim whatever he wants. It took him, Nappa, and Raditz together a MONTH to conquer one planet. And Goku CAN destroy a planet, but he is too slow to pull it off, and it would not kill Superman regardless.

O RLY? How's about the fact that Goku and friends managed to topple a character who by feats trumps absolutely every character in the canon DB universe? It is NONCANON, and how's about you prove it shows canon ability? You were always b!tching about people using UDON for SF, how about you prove that the movie showed canon abilities?

we'll talk about UDON later. tell me the differences about how they fought in movie and anime or manga.

I think Broly is weak, fragile was just your assumption.

a guy who can one shot a galaxy is not weak..that's pure BS..

Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
we'll talk about UDON later. tell me the differences about how they fought in movie and anime or manga.

I think Broly is weak, fragile was just your assumption.

How's about you just man-up and admit your own double standard? Tell you the differences? Well how about the fact that Akira Toriyama did not write the anime, nor the movies, and has never regarded them as canon? Did they fight "differently?" Not really, used same style anyway. But let me inquire this of you, do the SF characters fight differently in UDON? 🙂 And the anime and movies are noncanon whether you like it or not, and the proof is the fact that the Z Fighters toppled an adversary(Broly) who was much more powerful than any other in the series.

Fragile is an assumption? He is far too fragile to fight Superman. There is no assumption about this.

Originally posted by Slaanesh
a guy who can one shot a galaxy is not weak..that's pure BS..
In terms of physical strength, speed, and durability, he is very weak compared to Superman. Can he destroy more than Superman? Yeah.

But in a fight it will not matter, as Superman will have beaten him before Broly could begin to form the blast that destroyed the galaxy.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Did Vegeta in canon ever state he was going to destroy the planet, or just the dub, cause the dub is filled with errors in translation. Or just stupidity. And Vegeta can claim whatever he wants. It took him, Nappa, and Raditz together a MONTH to conquer one planet. And Goku CAN destroy a planet, but he is too slow to pull it off, and it would not kill Superman regardless.

O RLY? How's about the fact that Goku and friends managed to topple a character who by feats trumps absolutely every character in the canon DB universe? It is NONCANON, and how's about you prove it shows canon ability? You were always b!tching about people using UDON for SF, how about you prove that the movie showed canon abilities?

here's from wikipedia :

This beam known as the Garlic Gun (ギャリック砲, Gyarikku Hō?, or Galick Gun in the English dub) is used by Vegeta during his battle against Goku in an attempt to destroy the Earth

he wants to destroy the earth. and it took a month to conquer one planet, not destroy it

here's about broly from wikipedia :

The film is considered canon due to the consistencies with the main storyline. While the movie fits into the Cell Games Saga, specifically the 10-day waiting period, these events would have most likely occurred due to their preoccupation with how to defeat Cell in the Games

about UDON, like I said, we'll talk later.

Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
here's from wikipedia :

he wants to destroy the earth. and it took a month to [b]conquer one planet, not destroy it

here's about broly from wikipedia :

about UDON, like I said, we'll talk later. [/B]

Wikipedia as a source? You insult me.

Find me something official please.

reliable or not you're the one who decide. just analyze those quotes by yourself. for me, wikipedia is quite reliable. Wikipedia articles should use reliable, third-party, published sources

Wikipedia, nice.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
In terms of physical strength, speed, and durability, he is very weak compared to Superman. Can he destroy more than Superman? Yeah.

But in a fight it will not matter, as Superman will have beaten him before Broly could begin to form the blast that destroyed the galaxy.

have u ever seen a guy who can bust galaxy and have great power has a shity durability??people believe odin can bust galaxy..did he have a shity durubility??tyrant and galactus can bust galaxy..did he have a shity durability??they all show great power..but doesn't show great strength or speed..did they all show shity durability??all of this guy can beat sup..why..because they are more powerfull..

Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
even Goku in saiyan saga has enough power to stand toe to toe with a planet buster.

So Saiyan Saga Goku could stand up against Frieza? Goku stomps him. Kamehameha's aren't magic so they won't do any damage to him. Superman is more durable and arguabaly faster and physically stronger.