Exxon Mobil: Biggest profit in U.S. history

Started by Bardock425 pages

Oh ****ing hell, you are an idiot. That's all I'm going to say about that topic from now on, since you obviously don't want to discuss points.

Moving on to Exxon making a profit. Good for them, but I wish they didn't because better, cheaper energy should be available.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I thought you are totally against a monetary system? Why do you want to steal it from companies?
Originally posted by lord xyz

I understand it's stealing, which is wrong, however, corporations essentailly steal the money anyway through manipulation and debt etc.


😱
LOL @ XYZ accepting Bardock's worldview! Honestly, I laughed at this. XYZ accepted the frame of 'stealing', tacitly accepting that it was a bad thing- which he doesn't think it is at all.

I self-study communication, so I find this interesting.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh ****ing hell, you are an idiot. That's all I'm going to say about that topic from now on, since you obviously don't want to discuss points.

Moving on to Exxon making a profit. Good for them, but I wish they didn't because better, cheaper energy should be available.

**** you and your delusions.

You're just afraid of looking like a douche.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
😱
LOL @ XYZ accepting Bardock's worldview! Honestly, I laughed at this. XYZ accepted the frame of 'stealing', tacitly accepting that it was a bad thing- which he doesn't think it is at all.

I self-study communication, so I find this interesting.

When I have I been infavour of stealing?

Originally posted by lord xyz
I'm sorry, but I haven't seen a case where someone died from a loss of oxygen (in natural circumstances). I urge you to give me one, but no. Just haven't seen it.

thats essentially moot though

there is a theoretical limit to the amount of available, breathable oxygen on the planet at any one time, thus it is a finite resource, thus it is scarce.

I'm talking about economic scarcity at a theoretical level (at least in my understanding), not scarce in the colloquial, ie: something not readily available

You mean, like if every living thing on the planet were to inhale at the same time?

now you're on the trolley

Originally posted by inimalist
now you're on the trolley

**** that. I can walk faster than that.

Werent they making record profits when oil was 140 or whatever? Now they are doing it while its at 60?

Curse these evil capitalist pig corporations. They will pay for being so evil and taking advantage of the little guy!

Originally posted by KidRock
Werent they making record profits when oil was 140 or whatever? Now they are doing it while its at 60?

Curse these evil capitalist pig corporations. They will pay for being so evil and taking advantage of the little guy!

You didn't even read the article, did you?

Originally posted by lord xyz
**** you and your delusions.

You're just afraid of looking like a douche.

When I have I been infavour of stealing?

While debating with you? Oh, please.

I countered your points, you repeated the same shit.

Originally posted by inimalist
thats essentially moot though

there is a theoretical limit to the amount of available, breathable oxygen on the planet at any one time, thus it is a finite resource, thus it is scarce.

I'm talking about economic scarcity at a theoretical level (at least in my understanding), not scarce in the colloquial, ie: something not readily available

Air is renewable.

Originally posted by Bardock42
While debating with you? Oh, please.

I countered your points, you repeated the same shit.

Again, delusional.

I know how the debate took place, you didn't counter anything, just said stuff that doesn't apply as I've already provided points against them.

****ing hell, please stop turning into RJ. It's not flattering.

Originally posted by Bardock42
****ing hell, please stop turning into RJ. It's not flattering.

I'm sorry, RJ is much happier than XYZ. That was actually an insult to RJ. XYZ is just a grumpy pants.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm sorry, RJ is much happier than XYZ. That was actually an insult to RJ. XYZ is just a grumpy pants.
That depends on what you value. I suppose RJ is happier. He's also a bit closer to clinical retardation. So...you know, whatever you value.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That depends on what you value. I suppose RJ is happier. He's also a bit closer to clinical retardation. So...you know, whatever you value.

I'd take a happy retard over a whining grumpy pants any day.

Also, I'm a retard myself....I like retarded company, obviously.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'd take a happy retard over a whining grumpy pants any day.

Also, I'm a retard myself....I like retarded company, obviously.

I guess I might agree if we are just talking about hanging out or makign small talk. In a debate though, I prefer the grumpy person usually.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I guess I might agree if we are just talking about hanging out or makign small talk. In a debate though, I prefer the grumpy person usually.
🙁

Not a grumpy idiot, though. That gets nowhere fast.

Originally posted by dadudemon
🙁

Not a grumpy idiot, though. That gets nowhere fast.

True, true. Think xyz will ***** and moan about how we talk about him?

Originally posted by Bardock42
True, true. Think xyz will ***** and moan about how we talk about him?

Well, I honestly think he is yelling at his computer screen and pounding his fist on his desk. He's like, "Stupid bloody yank and stupid Kraut!"

Of course, internet popularity is so important these days.

I've gotten to the point of seeing past these images that people portray for themselves and see them for who they really are.

Do either of you intend of doing something more fulfilling in your life, instead of wasting it at the PC, on a shit forum?