Origins of Mankind

Started by Bardock423 pages

Fusion is the process of converting lighter atoms into heavier ones (fusing them), as the Sun and other stars do. The earth core is made up of melted metals. I am not aware of such a theory of creation of the atmosphere (as I gather is what you are saying), but I don't have much knowledge of that subject, though, I don't exactly know how that would work.

Originally posted by Lycanthrope
Could you explain? Please explain to me what the core of the earth is because i am confused . Is it not the compression or immense pressure of gravity that smashes the atoms together. I really don't know i thought that was what fusion was. The smashing of Atoms? Im not being a smart A** if you know please tell me. I can find a link where Planetary science confirms the colliding of an external planet (actually a satellite from this invading planet) to our Solar system which amalgamated to form earth to which the Moon is a chunk of from the original earth. The bigger chunks,through gravitational pull , formed Earth.The heat generated, from fusion i thought, spewed gasses which started to form an atmosphere which the atmosphere is what made it possible for hydrogen and oxygen to collect and form rain thus the beginnings of life on earth.
Earth's core is liquid iron on the outside, solid iron on the inside. Heat comes from a few sources, eg, the core hasn't completely cooled yet, it is still spinning (that's how we get our magnetic field), and there's deep radioactivity (basically the heaviest elements settle nearest to the center of gravity).

The gases forming earth's atmosphere also have a few sources: gases initially attracted to the growing planet, gases spewing from molten rock, etc.

Earth and its formation have no direct business with nuclear fusion.

😮‍💨

This is like the telephone game . When i said fusion i meant ,Initially,the fusion of the the two planetary bodies. I new the core was molten and the cause was from the collision this was my only point. Initially. Thanks for the clarifications though.

Re: Origins of Mankind

Originally posted by Lycanthrope
Has anyone read series "Earth Chronicle" by Zecheria Sitchin? He interpreted the oldest written text(Sumarian cuneiform) of the Origins of mankind. Its hard to believe because its seems so fantastic but it coincides with the same themes of all the ancient "Origin stories" from around the world. These cultures had no way of interaction, at least to date this isolation has not been disproved. The Olmecs(Meso-America)
Hindi books "Rig Veda" Egyptians, Asia I.E. Japan, Chine, . I realize geographically India,Mesopotamia and Egypt are close but we are talking 3,700 B.C. All have the same story of Beings descending from the heavens and giving us the Knowledge of Civilization. The one thing that strikes me is, after the Millenia of us being cave dwellers and wearing animal skins, stone tools etc.,it is literally over night that we start having Walled Cities, Organized Army's ,Agriculture, Astronomy. The ancients new that our planetary system was Heliocentric almost 4,000 B.C. and within 6,000 years of these coinciding "Ancient Mythos Origin stories" we are exploring space. Its interesting to me how we stayed stagnant for a Million years and we have progressed so much within a couple thousand . The Bible even talks about the Nephilim who come down "from the heavens" and find the earth beings beautiful and mate with them thus introducing new Genetic codes. We only use up to 10% of our Brain? 60% of our DNA is dormant? Just interesting.

okay this guy here micheal tsarion talks about origin of man and its religious similarities/myths... kinda out their but what religion isnt.

http://quicksilverscreen.com/watch?video=44388