end of page re-post.
Originally posted by jinzin
The reason why he's bringing this up is because he wants to
try and compare how we view Creed and base his abilities in conjunction with Wolverine's to Blade and how they base his abilities in conjunction with... well whatever they think the abilities of the vampire norm are.What he fails to understand, and has failed to understand since day one, is that Sabretooth's statements have been written by other characters not in the form of hyperbolic poem but in flat out statements, or statements made by 3rd person narrative, or even proven/supported on panel.
He doesn't get how Sabretooth being directly compared to characters and their specific abilities is worlds apart from stating that Blade compares roughly to vampire fodder in the vaguest of notions.
Nor does he understand how the fact that: Blade not only doesn't have feats to support their conjecture about his abilities but he ALSO has feats in complete contradiction to that conjecture proving his limitations.... is also worlds apart from Creed proven his given statements on panel.
Originally posted by Deadline
I dunno about that you were arguing that weather conditions and rats weren't going to do shit.
Yeah in a nutshell I was.. So if you understood the basic context of why I said what I said than why are you mangling said context to assume an argument I never made?
Originally posted by Deadline
Why are you acting like its a fact? You might be right.
Asked and answered I guess..
I'm confident in my argument because it's based on other feats across the board presented through multiple books etc etc...
If you're going to police arguments why is it only mine? Why don't you attack ninjak for his assumptions that Wolverine's going through worse than what Sabretooth was put through in hell even though we never SEE what happened to Sabretooth in hell?
Is it because you like to single out certain members of the forum with constant harassment? Me thinks so. 😉
Uh yeah.... Unless you'd like to think he's EVER displayed anything even CLOSE to his classic appearances in the last 2 decades... the appearances that you Vamp heads like to constantly bring up as reasons for him winning these fights....
Because as I recall, you don't seem to have a problem with Blade fighting Drac on equal footing so we can't assume it's just PIS right? 🙄
Originally posted by jinzinDo you have any on-panel proof or just hopes and dreams?
Uh yeah.... Unless you'd like to think he's EVER displayed anything even CLOSE to his classic appearances in the last 2 decades... the appearances that you Vamp heads like to constantly bring up as reasons for him winning these fights....Because as I recall, you don't seem to have a problem with Blade fighting Drac on equal footing so we can't assume it's just PIS right? 🙄
Originally posted by snoopdogg
Do you have any on-panel proof or just hopes and dreams?
Just the drastic difference in Dracula's performances pre and post......
Originally posted by Deadline
Just make stuff up as they go along. Latest theory post-montesi forumla Dracula. Anything else?By the way owning BK in two panels and taking a full force punch from Captain Britain. BK ain't shit now, watch.
How is THAT the latest theory? I argued as much several years ago when people were pulling out this Dracula that fights Blade is a class 100, herald level team wrecker bullshit.