Revamped Superman Respect Thread!!!!

Started by Kris Blaze21 pages

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e156/marvelkris/week01-2000-Superman_V2-152-15.jpg

Superman instinctively pulls his punches.

Originally posted by fangirl101
That isn't the entire fight.

Pretty sure that's all there is to that encounter.

Originally posted by fangirl101
HV >>>His strength?

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e156/marvelkris/week01-2000-Superman_V2-152-15.jpg

Originally posted by fangirl101
After DS had been blasted by the Source Staff.

And got the poop kicked out of him by Batman.

Originally posted by fangirl101
blizting Aremis. 😕

Yes?

......................

Stop spamming.

Originally posted by batdude123
Pretty sure that's all there is to that encounter.

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e156/marvelkris/week01-2000-Superman_V2-152-15.jpg

And got the poop kicked out of him by Batman.

Yes?

......................

Stop spamming.


Pretty sure Wondy said somewhere in that encounter that He was taken over and that was surely effecting her thinking.

Pretty sure my comment was that Superman was getting handled when it came to hand to hand and that one blast of HV ended the fight. Which means that it was a stupid comic. Hv.Strength? And Superman pulling his punches but not his HV? Also lunacy.

Pretty sure batman was amped by tech.
And I was unaware that artemis was anyone to be considered worthy of of a feat.
The nerve and gall of you to say I'm spamming and tell me what to stop doing but not do the same in other threads.

Does anyone have any scan of Superman fighting Imperiex Prime while he was sun amped and equiped

No. I have it in a comic book...

Originally posted by fangirl101
Pretty sure Wondy said somewhere in that encounter that He was taken over and that was surely effecting her thinking.

Pretty sure my comment was that Superman was getting handled when it came to hand to hand and that one blast of HV ended the fight. Which means that it was a stupid comic. Hv.Strength? And Superman pulling his punches but not his HV? Also lunacy.

Pretty sure batman was amped by tech.
And I was unaware that artemis was anyone to be considered worthy of of a feat.
The nerve and gall of you to say I'm spamming and tell me what to stop doing but not do the same in other threads.

It's spamming because this is a respect thread. This is not the place to discredit Superman by reinterpreting (re: misinterpreting) his feats.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Pretty sure Wondy said somewhere in that encounter that He was taken over and that was surely effecting her thinking.

Pretty sure my comment was that Superman was getting handled when it came to hand to hand and that one blast of HV ended the fight. Which means that it was a stupid comic. Hv.Strength? And Superman pulling his punches but not his HV? Also lunacy.

Pretty sure batman was amped by tech.
And I was unaware that artemis was anyone to be considered worthy of of a feat.
The nerve and gall of you to say I'm spamming and tell me what to stop doing but not do the same in other threads.

Reported for spamming.

Originally posted by Eel O'Brien
It's spamming because this is a respect thread. This is not the place to discredit Superman by reinterpreting (re: misinterpreting) his feats.

Check the Wondy thread and give the same advice. If you are going to police the forum, Police the entire forum.

Keep fighting the good fight!

LMAO at NVR, gets angry because he misrepresents a scan so he decides to spam this thread heh.

Discussion of feats is actually ok. That's part of what these threads are for, not simply mindless adherence to the character.

However. Fangirl, make sure it doesn't become an issue. Say what you have to say and be done (it looks like you already have). Discussion is one thing. Protracted arguments are quite another, and I will intervene if it becomes the latter.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Check the Wondy thread and give the same advice. If you are going to police the forum, Police the entire forum.

Yeah, it sucks that your thread got messed up; but I don't see kgkg spamming it, so why retaliate in a thread he created?

If feats are presented incorrectly, its a obligation to call them out...and that's all we did in the WW respect thread.

Originally posted by The Great Galen
If feats are presented incorrectly, its a obligation to call them out...and that's all we did in the WW respect thread.

Its an Obligation ? 😆

Sorry being very pretentious and trolling slightly, do carry on .

Looking very pre-crisis there superman.

Originally posted by Galvaclaw

Looking very pre-crisis there superman.

What book is that from ?

Thumbnails, man.

Though, I might understand why you want it to slap people in the face.

With context, this feat is actually even better than a simple planet-moving feat. Much better.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Thumbnails, man.

Though, I might understand why you want it to slap people in the face.

With context, this feat is actually even better than a simple planet-moving feat. Much better.

IMO planet moving should be only accomplished by entity's with access to limitless power sources. It would take the ENTIRE Sun several years to put out enough energy to move the Earth.

Originally posted by Cartesian Doubt
IMO planet moving should be only accomplished by entity's with access to limitless power sources. It would take the ENTIRE Sun several years to put out enough energy to move the Earth.

that would assume, though, that superman is straight up burning solar energy that enters his body. we have no way of knowing if there's any refinement process that somehow enhances the effects of the sunlight, makes it last longer, or amplifies it in some way...

Originally posted by Raoul
that would assume, though, that superman is straight up burning solar energy that enters his body. we have no way of knowing if there's any refinement process that somehow enhances the effects of the sunlight, makes it last longer,

Well even if he does have some storage method (Whch he probably does) he would literally have to had drained the sun of ALL its energy over the last few years. That means that there no heat or light left for anyone else.

Originally posted by Raoul
or amplifies it in some way...

If this is the case, why is he referred to as a Solar battery. It would be more like a Solar catalyst. I don't like this idea, as it kind of makes the whole Solar battery idea redundant.