Imperiex +probes vs Marvel earth(classic)

Started by iceman245677 pages
iceman24567 Senior Member

Originally posted by UKR
Imperiex is nothing compared to Galactus on ANY occasion...Superman is never above top tiers. Letting go of his humanity? Lol, it seems like every time Superman loses, it's just an excuse for him to discover he was holding back. Sounds like Goku-itis. What a pile of crap. Galactus is the original, he would eat Imperiex and his probes for breakfast. Superman without his humanity would get his ass kicked by Thor, and how the fck does MM matter. Ur the biggest goddamned fanboy I've ever seen.
Really the Dc basher calling somebody a fanboy classic well Imperiex would poop on Galactus face it you know nothing but how to bash goodluck not getting banned by the way you are easily a bigger fanboy.

Enyalus MALE DOMINANCE!!!

For the record, showings of Imperiex > showings of Galactus on average.

Bentley Seitei
Originally posted by Enyalus
For the record, showings of Imperiex > showings of Galactus on average.

No shit!

Classic NES Balloooooooooooooon
Originally posted by Enyalus
For the record, showings of Imperiex > showings of Galactus on average.

Doesn't change the fact that Galactus Full power> Imperiex. Marvel wins this thread match anyway 10/10

iceman24567 Senior Member

Originally posted by Classic NES
Doesn't change the fact that Galactus Full power> Imperiex. Marvel wins this thread match anyway 10/10
When has Galactus been at full power? How do you gauge Galactus at full power? Well as far as showings go Imperiex > Galactus at full power.

Classic NES Balloooooooooooooon

Watcher stated that Galactus at full power could destroy the universe ten times over.

iceman24567 Senior Member

Originally posted by Classic NES
Watcher stated that Galactus at full power could destroy the universe ten times over.
So you are basing your opinion off of what a watcher said instead of showings or feats? That's cool but the proof is in the pudding showings has Imperiex above Galactus.

Raoul Hey Yo!

any of you guys want to post some proof of your arguments?

Classic NES Balloooooooooooooon
Originally posted by iceman24567
So you are basing your opinion off of what a watcher said instead of showings or feats? That's cool but the proof is in the pudding showings has Imperiex above Galactus.

Sure, why would the watcher lie anyway? Statements can be just as valid as showings, besides it would be out of character for Galactus to destroy the universe because he would die as well from hunger.

iceman24567 Senior Member

Who needs proof when we have each other 🙂.

iceman24567 Senior Member

Originally posted by Classic NES
Sure, why would the watcher lie anyway? Statements can be just as valid as showings, besides it would be out of character for Galactus to destroy the universe because he would die as well from hunger.
I never said the watcher lied I just don't by into statements without some form of proof via feats it makes debating easier. Imperiex was stated to be a Multiversal threat that only proves so much no. By the way Dc Multiverse > ten univereses just saying if we go by what was stated Imperiex still trumps Galactus.

Classic NES Balloooooooooooooon
Originally posted by iceman24567
I never said the watcher lied I just don't by into statements without some form of proof via feats it makes debating easier. Imperiex was stated to be a Multiversal threat that only proves so much no. By the way Dc Multiverse > ten univereses just saying if we go by what was stated Imperiex still trumps Galactus.

You can't show proof in this instance because destroying the universe would be out of Big G's character. Just because he doesn't destroy the universe does not mean he can't and threat to the multiverse can be interpreted in many different ways. Besides, Galactus destroying universes would make him a multiversal threat as well.

iceman24567 Senior Member

Eh whatever floats your boat pal I have work to do on my toilet later.