Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Your entire argument is based around the fact that you are PUTTING WORDS INTO MY MOUTH.Maybe if I had claimed that WTC was not tragic would your logic have worked, but I did not. Seems like your projecting to try and keep an argument going. While the Civil War in Burma is incredible, the violations of the human rights are not as bad as the ones taking place in congo. Both have a fair share of slavery/selling of sex slaves, but Burma does not have an army of 12 year olds carrying this out.
Keyword being on-going, in relations to your mention of historic events.
Though Burma is, an incredible tragedy and another reason why WTC does not deserve as much attention as it did.
Learn how to falugging read.
That's a flawed argument though, you're putting the cart before the horse.
You are saying Sept. 11th doesn't deserve as much attention as it got because there are worse tragedies. Right?
Why not just say that those worse tragedies just deserve more attention? The W.T.C. tragedy got deserved attention, the others didn't. It doesn't mean W.T.C. deserved less. That's a dumb argument.
Also, age doesn't make a difference. Human suffering is human suffering. They don't reach an age where they drop on the tragedy list. If they do, then you're immoral. Either you care about humans throughout all ages or you don't. Putting emphasis on age is ridiculous.
-AC
