Originally posted by BattlehammerI'm not talking about the Spitfre feat. About any feat, go back to the last few pages of the respect thread. Srank was like "Hrolf didn't cut Blade, Blade had kevlar on, Blade couldn't heal his lost hand." and so on.
nit pick? man your delusion you likly believe this don't you. First it not blade, second no were in the entire feat does it show sage to be superior in speed.you and desttard are the only ones that see that as sage movign faster..........I showed it to like 10 people so far every single including mods all said no way in hell is that showing superior speed for sage.
Originally posted by snoopdogg
You honestly believe that Spider-man threw the homing beacon on Sage because he knew he couldn't make up a 20 ft head start? LOL! Funny.Anyways let's move on to Jamal Afari.
yes I think so. Or have you never seen sprinters before? do you even understand how much that is a head start. It be impossable to catch up if sage was in his speed range.........hell olympic runners the sprint about 50 yeards even the winner vs compared to the lower is only liek a two feet head of them tops.
not 30 feat a head prity much ina window, before spiderman even moves
Originally posted by snoopdogg
I'm not talking about the Spitfre feat. About any feat, go back to the last few pages of the respect thread. Srank was like "Blade didn't cut Hrolf, Blade had kevlar on, Blade couldn't heal his lost hand." and so on.
Originally posted by Battlehammer
ecpt he not.........hell the scan you used to say he was faster........had him 30 plus feat away from spiderman..............and becuases he got away you some how thought in some form of twisted logic that he was faster..........requardless the the fact he ahd a 30 foot head start...........
and whats even funnier if you look at the scan he started pritty much in the window..........and spiderman got to the spot him was in merely a second before he jump out..........cover vastly more land then he in the same time...........but some how you guys ignore that as well as ignore the fact he had a huge ehad start.........and simply said the vamp was faster due to bias.........
jamal afari also speedblitzed spiderman, dracula (who blade fights on a regular basis) took on the xmen by himself.
spiderman was no where near the spot when he eclaimed sage was too fast, then a panel later which is in no way means it was a second later, spiderman was at the window, all we know is spiderma ncontinued to track sage, and he couldnt catch him.
Originally posted by Battlehammernot only did spiderman not catch up, he wasnt even close enough to get a hand on the wall. if he was as fast as you say spiderman wouldve caught him as soon as they left the building, but he couldnt which is why he put the tracker on him, again sage speedblitzed spiderman and overpowered him easily.
20 feat? pleases that wall a lone was 20 feat were talking at the lowest 30 and like 40.yes I think so. Or have you never seen sprinters before? do you even understand how much that is a head start. It be impossable to catch up if sage was in his speed range.........hell olympic runners the sprint about 50 yeards even the winner vs compared to the lower is only liek a two feet head of them tops.
not 30 feat a head prity much ina window, before spiderman even moves
Originally posted by Battlehammer
srank not me and it likly would not happen if you dident try and uses scans that clearly don't show superior speed, but talk your self into believing it.
oh sure spiderman saying he's too fast, then later aving that same vampire speedblitz spiderman before he can react (he even gave spiderma nthe heads up by talking to him and only the ndid his spider sense go off)
all of this points to sage>spiderman in speed
we have a direct statement and that vampire speedblitzing spiderman later.
as for silver samurai you havent provided any feats.
as for silver samurai:
we have blade with superior speed:
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Bladeslicin.jpg
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Bladeslicin2.jpg
until proven otherwise
Originally posted by snoopdogg
Quit lying. You said that yesterday also.
Originally posted by snoopdogg
There logically can be no argument made for Spidey being faster. The very least they can be is equal for if Spidey was faster he wouldn't have needed the homing beacon. So basically we have Sage was equal or better than Spidey in speed. And Spidey was equal at best or below Sage in speed.
sage had a huge head started. wtf don't you get. You can't magical amde up the distences of that amount when an opponets around yoru speed level.
are you kidding me? like do you even get how much of an adavntage that is?
also did you not see spiderman almost get there intime.........he cover mroe ground then mister sage in the same amount of time. or you just ignorign that?
Originally posted by BattlehammerFor the last time I'm not kidding you.
are you kidding me?sage had a huge head started. wtf don't you get. You can't magical amde up the distences of that amount when an opponets around yoru speed level.
are you kidding me? like do you even get how much of an adavntage that is?
also did you not see spiderman almost get there intime.........he cover mroe ground then mister sage in the same amount of time. or you just ignorign that?
Originally posted by snoopdogg
For the last time I'm not kidding you.
I am I guys one can let there bias actaully compelte morph an image into soemthing it not.
Originally posted by BattlehammerOk, we established I am delusional. So now we can move on the Samurai vs Blade?
well your delusional, there nothing elses to say.No other person I showed the scan do even thoguht for a second him had been faster..........must thought it was rediculous that people argue that he was...............I am I guys one can let there bias actaully compelte morph an image into soemthing it not.
Originally posted by Battlehammeryou mean srank...who also said blade had kevlar on whlie being shot (blade said he didnt) and that hrolf never cut blade...when blade is shown bleeding
well your delusional, there nothing elses to say.No other person I showed the scan to even thoguht for a second him had been faster..........most thought it was rediculous that people argue that he was...............I am I guys one can let there bias actaully compelte morph an image into soemthing it not.
and now sage isnt faster, when spiderman not only claims that sage is faster he is speedblitzed later before he can react, he couldnt even move in time after his spider sense went off.
Originally posted by DestinyGuy678Srank also said Blade's hand was still bleeding after he lost it. But neglected to mention that Blade was weakened from lack of blood and could barely stand.
you mean srank...who also said blade had kevlar on whlie being shot (blade said he didnt) and that hrolf never cut blade...when blade is shown bleedingand now sage isnt faster, when spiderman not only claims that sage is faster he is speedblitzed later before he can react, he couldnt even move in time after his spider sense went off.
