Silver Samruria vs Blade

Originally posted by Battlehammer
How can I percieve an event that was never shown to take place and that which holds no phsyical evidences backing it, but rather the physical evidences condricts it.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
I'm guessing by the cars and the clothes people were wearing at that time that Blade and Wolverine first met in the 1920's.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
I was thinking more 1930's or 40's.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
What I notices recently is that starscream aka masterbruces repeatedly gets into debates with me on what occured in comics he has never read. Also I have noticed that he purposivly goes out of his way to argue with me no matter what it about or how wrong or ignorant he is of the subject.........wait who am I kidding that not new to me he been doing it for months.

everyone else who's read the comic disagrees with you.

You're simply ridiculous first claiming the guy is lying and then saying that wolverine would allow himself to be cut.

you have very little credibility.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Like I said. View that how you want and I will do the same. It's really not that big of deal.

Only problems I have had is with some one saying Blades healing factor is faster then Wolverine's. Then basing this not on any feats of Blade, but by a feat of another character. Which is stupid even if it was Blade doing the feat that does not make him heal faster, but whats even worses is it not even Blade.

Originally posted by Starscream M
am I the only one arguing with you? no.

everyone else who's read the comic disagrees with you.

You're simply ridiculous first claiming the guy is lying and then saying that wolverine would allow himself to be cut.

you have very little credibility.

I am not talking about this event. I am talking in general.

Use repeatedly get into debates about issues you have never read.

Oh pleases I have vastly more crediability then you.

Mister I read origins........but I ca't recall a single thing........capt was not given a blood clot your a lyer he had medical issues before the fight........you get shown the scann......and then poof you stop responding

Originally posted by jinzin
Do you not understand what an implication is? That statement indirectly compares Wolverine to Flash in speed and implies as much as a result. If it wasn't meant to imply anything about a comparison between the two, then two subjects wouldn't be brought up a simple "nothing human moves that fast" would suffice by itself. This is simple English people. 😬

so even if he said "wolverine is as fast as a vampire" it is worthless.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
I am not talking about this event. I am talking in general.

Use repeatedly get into debates about issues you have never read.

Oh pleases I have vastly more crediability then you.

Originally posted by Starscream M
I debate characters, not issues. I never claimed I read it. but from what other people described, I could make my own conclusions.

Originally posted by Starscream M
jinzin, do you not realize the guy has never even seen a vampire before?

so even if he said "wolverine is as fast as a vampire" it is worthless.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
It was before WW II I think as the cars look like model t's and the like and besides Logan would have been in the war anyways. 1930's is also likely.

Originally posted by Starscream M
jinzin, do you not realize the guy has never even seen a vampire before?

so even if he said "wolverine is as fast as a vampire" it is worthless.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
do you realizes your debating about an invent in which something was implyed, but you have never read it...........do you understand how dumb that is?

I sware to go someone jsut said the Black Panther would probly defeat Gorgon.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
do you realizes your debating about an invent in which something was implyed, but you have never read it...........do you understand how dumb that is?

yet he's never even seen a vampire

you were the one who earlier on was trying to use the fact that he impled Logan was as fast as a vampire

Originally posted by Starscream M
he was implying logan was a vampire

yet he's never even seen a vampire

you were the one who earlier on was trying to use the fact that he impled Logan was as fast as a vampire

Nope I was mention what was said.

The guy believed wolverine was a vampire, but had never seen one. He also believed no human could move that fast.

Originally posted by Battlehammer

Mister I read origins........but I ca't recall a single thing........capt was not given a blood clot your a lyer he had medical issues before the fight........you get shown the scann......and then poof you stop responding

I actually remembered quite a bit from Origins, but you kept on testing me until I got something wrong...which of course would happen since I only read them quickly in a comic store

dude you discredit your self..............kept testing you? you got every question wrong

Originally posted by jinzin
I believe it was referenced as the 30's.

Back on topic. After eating lunch and glancing at a Bunch of the scans in the blade respect thread, I think Blade's superior physical abilities and capabilities put him over the top. SS is good but blade would win, in h2h and with all his weapons/gadgets. Sword fighting is arguable but I think Blade still takes it.

he has NO physical superiority. SS is a class 10 with MA skills on par with Logan and speed on par with Spiderman..... 😐

Originally posted by jinzin
he has NO physical superiority. SS is a class 10 with MA skills on par with Logan and speed on par with Spiderman..... 😐

I'd like to se some silver samurai feats though.