Master Chief vs Nightmare

Thank you, Styletime.

And DarkC, there's stories of children and people surviving the ground zero detonations of the nuckes in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

6. I pretty much conceded that post.

Then why are we discussing this?

Nightmare's sword eats souls. Who's to say that Nightmare can't just devour Chief's soul while fighting? Nightmare wins this.

To put a cap on things.

Originally posted by Nemesis X
Nightmare's sword eats souls. Who's to say that Nightmare can't just devour Chief's soul while fighting? Nightmare wins this.

PIS.

^ what he said

Originally posted by StyleTime
I think your opposition suggests that the destruction resultant of the Siegfried/Nightmare clash is an effect related to properties inherent in Soul Edge rather than any actual strength level of its wielders.

And Blax, I conceded the dimensional shit because I admit it is highly speculative and tremendously difficult to prove.

Now, my argument was never even that Nightmare would BEAT Chief, Chief is fast and strong enough to not be hit once and could handle Nightmare physically pretty easily.

However, some seem to be under the notion that Nightmare can swing his sword at Chief constantly, with Chief taking the blow like he's the friggin Juggernaut.

Nightmare's got friggin Soul Edge. How strong is that sword anyway? For all we know, it's probably strong enough to wreck Chief's armor.

Originally posted by Nemesis X
Nightmare's got friggin Soul Edge. How strong is that sword anyway? For all we know, it's probably strong enough to wreck Chief's armor.

Then Chief can take a anti-tank missile head on.

Originally posted by DarkC
Well from what I saw in the SC3 trailer a single swing was able to send several soldiers flying through the air.

Then Chief can take a anti-tank missile head on.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
And since Nightmare wields Soul Edge, why would this matter?

Keep in mind, I'm just trying to clarify what someone else said. You'll have to check with him to be absolutely sure.

It's true.

Originally posted by StyleTime
I believe your opposition suggests that the same effect won't occur in the absence of a clash of the two swords. Should your opposition be correct, the castle annihilating shockwave feat would hold virtually no weight in a fight not containing the necessary weapons.

Keep in mind, I'm just trying to clarify what someone else said. You'll have to check with him to be absolutely sure.

It was never even hinted at that he needs Soul Calibur to be present to be at full capacity.

In fact, that would make no sense.

What you just said is more than likely correct actually. However, it has no bearing on what your opposition states. In a way, it helps your opposition more than it hurts.

Either way, your opposition's point still stands.