Originally posted by Phantom Zone
No its not, what bios usually get wrong is the exact strength range but when a bio rarely gets wrong is comparable strength range. For example Collosus and Thing have never been shown to be stronger than the Hulk.Also when it states that somebody has the traditional powers of a vampire, eternal etc they dont get that wrong.
When a bio states that somebody is superhuman they are never wrong. When we see that BB is stronger than Cap this suggests Blade is stronger.
Kingpin.
1. If Blade is stronger it's barely barely an issue. Fractionally. Hell the guy is listed as a 1 tonner, based on feats Cap is arguably at least that.
2. Classic Kingpin was a beast, he could overpower Spidey. Assuming it was this version.
Originally posted by snoopdogg
I show a scan of Cap realizing he can't match a vampire in strength, I then show a scan stating Blade has all the strength of the most powerful vampire and jiz don't think it's credible? Am I understanding this correctly?
It's funny that you should ask me what that scan tells me... because....
NOTHING!
That scans tells me absolutely nothing about Blades strength relative to Cap.
What it DOES tell me is that he has vampiric strength and that he's immortal.. that's it.
Even then, it's nothing more than a hyporbolic statement to get a point across.. When it comes down to it, we've seen the most powerful undead go rounds with Thor, Silver Surfer, and half the X-men, toss Ghost Rider around like a ragdoll, Overpower Spiderman like a child, overwhelm a Wendigo, and obtain control of the entire earth during a time when the N'garai ran rampant.
Yet Blade hasn't demonstrated that he can lift 5 tons let alone 15.
Romulus stated Wolverine to be the best of what th Lupin race had, yet Wolverine was notoriusly weaker than some of them, had a losing record against Sabretooth for years, and was curbed by Daken with relative ease.
Feats matter, hyperbole and titles DON'T...
You've proven that BB could be stronger than Cap, BB is not Blade.
Originally posted by Warrior18
1. If Blade is stronger it's barely barely an issue. Fractionally. Hell the guy is listed as a 1 tonner, based on feats Cap is arguably at least that.
True but as far as I know everybody classified as 1 ton tends to be shown to be slightly superior to Cap.
Originally posted by Warrior18
2. Classic Kingpin was a beast, he could overpower Spidey. Assuming it was this version.
It still backs up my point.
Originally posted by jinzin
It's funny that you should ask me what that scan tells me... because....NOTHING!
That scans tells me absolutely nothing about Blades strength relative to Cap.
What it DOES tell me is that he has vampiric strength and that he's immortal.. that's it.
Even then, it's nothing more than a hyporbolic statement to get a point across.. When it comes down to it, we've seen the most powerful undead go rounds with Thor, Silver Surfer, and half the X-men, toss Ghost Rider around like a ragdoll, Overpower Spiderman like a child, overwhelm a Wendigo, and obtain control of the entire earth during a time when the N'garai ran rampant.Yet Blade hasn't demonstrated that he can lift 5 tons let alone 15.
Romulus stated Wolverine to be the best of what th Lupin race had, yet Wolverine was notoriusly weaker than some of them, had a losing record against Sabretooth for years, and was curbed by Daken with relative ease.
Feats matter, hyperbole and titles DON'T...
You've proven that BB could be stronger than Cap, BB is not Blade.
👆
Originally posted by jinzinI remember a time whey you used to say Marvel vampires were pussies.
When it comes down to it, we've seen the most powerful undead go rounds with Thor, Silver Surfer, and half the X-men, toss Ghost Rider around like a ragdoll, Overpower Spiderman like a child, overwhelm a Wendigo, and obtain control of the entire earth during a time when the N'garai ran rampant.\
And now this! 😄
And these are the guys that fear Blade worlwide!!!!!!!!!!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
Originally posted by jinzinYet Blade hasn't demonstrated that he can lift 5 tons let alone 15.
Romulus stated Wolverine to be the best of what th Lupin race had, yet Wolverine was notoriusly weaker than some of them, had a losing record against Sabretooth for years, and was curbed by Daken with relative ease.
Thats funny I can think of lots of examples of vampires overpowering Blade...oh no I can't.
FAIL.
Oh and what did he mean by 'best'.?
Originally posted by snoopdoggRun of the mill vamps... yup...
I remember a time whey you used to say Marvel vampires were pussies.And now this! 😄
And these are the guys that fear Blade worlwide!!!!!!!!!!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
Originally posted by snoopdoggNobody wanna touch this?
Here Blade overpowers Deacon Frost who claimed he's 10 times stronger than Blade:
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/BladeandFrost.jpg
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/BladeandFrost2.jpgHanbdooks both list Baron Blood and Deacon Frost with the same 1500lbs strength.
Blade overpowers a vampire that punches him through a stone wall?
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
True but as far as I know everybody classified as 1 ton tends to be shown to be slightly superior to Cap.It still backs up my point.
1. Based on?
2. Maybe I didn't get your point, but classic KP was basically a superhuman capable of overpowering old school Spiderman. Old school spidey was what, 5-10 tonnes? Both stronger than Blade.
Originally posted by Warrior18not really, the only reason people think he fluctuates is because blade is constantly taking him out, rather than this meaning blade is skilled/powerful - it means draculas weak for some reason...however blade has fought nearly all-incarnations of dracula and done well, the reason is because many of draculas advantages don't work on blade (hypnotism or the vampire bite)
One minute Dracula is a peak/low superhuman with sharp teeth and pointy ears.............the next he takes out the X-men and fight guys like Dr Strange. He fluctuates horribly.
Originally posted by snoopdogg
Trolliing? Isn't team Wovlerine the guys who always bring a Blade thread back to Cap or Wolverine? Even though they are not involved?BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Actually - and I haven't read this thread yet - but the majority it seems to be you guys who do it. One of you (usually trackz) says something like "Dur Blade stalemated Wolverine." And then someone has to correct you guys for like the thousandth time.
People give you concret evidance of characters being stronger than Blade... and then you say "Ahahahaha lolza zomg!!!! Duh Blade's a zampire!!!!!!" and never address what has been said. Which is - incase you are wondering - trolling
Originally posted by jinzin
It's funny that you should ask me what that scan tells me... because....NOTHING!
That scans tells me absolutely nothing about Blades strength relative to Cap.
What it DOES tell me is that he has vampiric strength and that he's immortal.. that's it.
Even then, it's nothing more than a hyporbolic statement to get a point across.. When it comes down to it, we've seen the most powerful undead go rounds with Thor, Silver Surfer, and half the X-men, toss Ghost Rider around like a ragdoll, Overpower Spiderman like a child, overwhelm a Wendigo, and obtain control of the entire earth during a time when the N'garai ran rampant.Yet Blade hasn't demonstrated that he can lift 5 tons let alone 15.
Romulus stated Wolverine to be the best of what th Lupin race had, yet Wolverine was notoriusly weaker than some of them, had a losing record against Sabretooth for years, and was curbed by Daken with relative ease.
Feats matter, hyperbole and titles DON'T...
You've proven that BB could be stronger than Cap, BB is not Blade.
yea cause Blade is stronger than BB
