Originally posted by Phantom Zoneand Blade owned Dracula..it goes both ways, it could be argued that Blade had a bad day since they only fought once.
My point about the Spitfire fight still stands.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneThat was the only reason Spitfire got him into that position. She took advantage of Blade letting his guard down.You dont think that Blade whispering in Spitfires ear left him open? Didnt Blade say "not a good decision" in other words is not his fighting skill that got him punked it was the bad idea of whispering in her ear.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneBlade has fought Drac quite a few times and has never been tooled like Logan was iirc. 😬and oh yeah Blade has beaten Dracula, Wolverine got owned.
Originally posted by snoopdogg
ABC logic can swing both ways though, I agree. Blade has looked far more impressive against Dracula quite a few times as opposed to Logan's rather poor performance against the vampire king.
Elektra looking good against Logan means Elektra>Logan>Blade.
Since Logan pissed about with Blade in the only encounter between the two, negating the need for ABC logic to be applied with regards to Dracula.
😉
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
See what I mean? What about the others?
I got the impression that it was just three or four CK's that where melee'ing him.
He pulls one of the rope, grapples with two other agents and punches them both back and then panel pulls back and we see three agents engaged in melee with Blade. I don't think every one he hit was a different SHIELD Agents. Maybe they were... but that seems unlikely to me.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
No he got taken down because he hesistated.
Being reluctant to use a gun shouldn't have much baring on him getting taken down, I mean his reluctance doesn't impede his strength / speed / skill at all. Also there isn't any real indication of hesitance. Police say "Stop or I'll shoot," before they take the shoot. Giving a warning before he started taking fires isn't that big of a deal, maybe he would have started shooting immediately, who knows, but unfortunately he was taken down the very instant he drew his gun.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Ive stated to you eallier in the thread I dont think you are always wrong, so I dont disagree with everything you say. Sometimes your interpretation is correct, your problem is that you think your interpretation is ALWAYS correct.
Once again, if I didn't think my interpretation was correct... why would I post it? Hopefully, you think what you are saying is correct, and so does everyone else... but for some reason I'm the exception to rule? You'd like me to post things I don't believe are inaccurate? 😕
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Throwing a dagger at Sage isnt a class 20 feet but it could be described as an accurate feat.
It's a feat that wouldn't even require class one strength but was stated as being class 20.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Sparring with that skilled vampire could be similar to DD fighting Elektra.
DD and Elektra don't spar, they fight and when they fight, they don't end up on verge of making out. They also have pretty volatile personalities and believes that don't mesh well together. There is certainly going to be some CIS involved, as with any characters that have a complex history but nearly as much as you'd like and I'm not convinced that DD would be the one to suffer from it the most.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
The Dracula example is perfect example of you not comprehending when you are being negative. You didnt correct anything, the fact Wolverine hit him first is irrelevant...he lost.
Stating that Wolverine hit Dracula first, when Snoop implied otherwise, is me being negative?
🙄
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
You're still not getting and you are probably getting pissed because you realise how irrelevant that statement was.
Yeah I can barely sleep, I'm so pissed of about the relevance of my statement!!! 🙄
Snoop made an inaccurate statement where he purposely left facts out to suit his purpose... I corrected him.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Actually didnt say you were racist but you did say this in a Black Panther vs Mister Terrific thread.
lol Seriously?
Well I guess it wasn't very "PC," but that was the entire point of the statement. The rest of the world isn't crazy overly sensitive about race to the point of absurdity where Resident Evil is accused of racism, as America is. Race isn't really a big issue in Canada, I guess we can poke fun at the stupidity of racial stereotypes without someone having a conniption. Is it different in the UK?
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/BladeblockinNS16.jpgThe above is more impressive than this:
Elektra is blocking machine gun fire with her sai, which has a much smaller surface area then the blade of a katana, while Blade is blocking projectile studs with a sword. How fast do those studs move? Do they move as fast as machine gun fire? Seems unlikely. Also Blade blocked four studs, Elektra blocked (assuming each *ping* sound effect represents one bullet being blocked) eleven bullets.
I don't see how that feat is more impressive than Elektras... even saying it is equally impressive is a huge leap of faith.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
This feat is at least comparablehttp://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Bladereflexes.jpg
to this
Those two feats are really comparable. Elektra's is a feat of strength, its impressive because she effortlessly snapped a blade in half in her hands, not because she caught the dagger. Blade's is an example of reflexes and coordination, and viewed in comparison with Elektra's bullet blocking feats - like the one above - as it should be, it isn't very impressive.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
This feat is at least comparable[url]http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Bladereflexes.jpg
to this
Like I said above, its Elektra snapping the blade in half that is what is impressive, not the catching of the dagger. View simple as dagger catching feats, Blade's better... but Elektra catching the dagger isn't why I included it in the respect thread.
Originally posted by Battlehammerif he was severely weakened, he wouldnt have been able to take the sword to the chest, in the respect thread, when wolverines healing factor is taxed, moves like that usually put him down. (like against deadpool)
yea just like blade some how had an off day vs wolverine.......who was severally weaken
Originally posted by Trackz
if he was severely weakened, he wouldnt have been able to take the sword to the chest, in the respect thread, when wolverines healing factor is taxed, moves like that usually put him down. (like against deadpool)
actaully it wouldent. Logan can still take massive damage even in a weaken state.
Deadpool stabb a wolverine who literrally dident have a healing factor at the time........and was frizting out. That compeltely different.
Originally posted by Battlehammerif he didnt have a healing factor that attack would've killed him.
actaully it wouldent. Logan can still take massive damage even in a weaken state.Deadpool stabb a wolverine who literrally dident have a healing factor at the time........and was frizting out. That compeltely different.
that being said his healing factor worked fine in the fight,
