Lord Archimonde vs. Lord Voldemort

Started by ArtificialGlory2 pages

Lord Archimonde vs. Lord Voldemort

Voldemort has all his spells and is at his peak.
Archimonde's Finger/Hand of Death is disabled.

Two Lords enter, one Lord leaves 馃槢

What is an Archimonde? haermm

The Warcraft dude?

He stomps.

Literally. He steps on Voldemort.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
The Warcraft dude?

He stomps.

Literally. He steps on Voldemort.

But doesn't Voldemort have the killing curse or something?

And he can do this faster than the amount of time it takes Arichmonde to step on him how?

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
And he can do this faster than the amount of time it takes Arichmonde to step on him how?

Can't he like teleport around and fly?

Depends on if Voldemort can die or not. haermm

Originally posted by Barker
Depends on if Voldemort can die or not. haermm

Oh yes, Archimonde can make people die. Die in the most horrible ways.

Archimonde destroys Dalaran

What is "an" Archimonde?

If you're still wondering 馃槢

Unless Voldemort comes up with something incredible power (no not the Killing Curse not powerful enough) he dies.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Oh yes, Archimonde can make people die. Die in the most horrible ways.

Archimonde destroys Dalaran

What is "an" Archimonde?

If you're still wondering 馃槢


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horcrux

That Horcrux shit is bullcrap.

Sure he didn't "die," but it took him 14 years to resurrect himself.

That constitutes as a loss in a vs. thread.

Not to mention Arichmonde can cause planetary destruction, which would destroy the Horcruxes anyway.

Archimonde easily pawns Voldemort.

Mannoroth easily pawns Voldemort.

Arthas? Easily pawns Voldemort. He became Lich King.

Therefore,

Archimonde>Mannoroth>Arthas>Voldemort

Voldemort entered battle and about 50 people died. 50 ONLY??!!!

Archimonde was able to destroy an ENTIRE CITY just by creating a certain sand city and broke it with his bare hands...

Voldemort has 1/5 the power of Archimonde.

Originally posted by Utrigita
Unless Voldemort comes up with something incredible power (no not the Killing Curse not powerful enough) he dies.

How is the killing curse not powerful enough? If it hits you, it kills you.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
And he can do this faster than the amount of time it takes Arichmonde to step on him how?

Doesn't take long to shoot a spell at someone. Hell he could shoot him in the foot with it.

Because Archimonde contains more magiczorz in his pinky then Voldemort has in his entire body lol. And I do recall Archimonde having a resistance to magic so *shrug*

Originally posted by Quincy
How is the killing curse not powerful enough? If it hits you, it kills you.

So if you use it on a Giant the Giant dies if you uses it on a Dragon the Dragon dies? In what book was that stated that beings with a high level of resistance to magic is inkillable by the Curse, ore even beings that, like archimonde, have magic immunity would be killed?

As for the question itself, it required a detornation for hundreds if not thousands of wisps, a massive Nature Attack to kill Archimonde, at the same time the Night Elfes lost their immortality that was the price that they payed for getting rid of Archimonde.

Originally posted by Utrigita
So if you use it on a Giant the Giant dies if you uses it on a Dragon the Dragon dies? In what book was that stated that beings with a high level of resistance to magic is inkillable by the Curse, ore even beings that, like archimonde, have magic immunity would be killed?

I thought that was a given. It was just described as the killing curse - kills whoever it hits. I never asked for clarification from rowling.

In no book does it say that high magic resistant beings are inkillable with the spell. So its safe to assume that they can be killed.

If he can't be hurt by magic then obviously Archimonde will win. The thread becomes pointless now.

Originally posted by Quincy
I thought that was a given. It was just described as the killing curse - kills whoever it hits. I never asked for clarification from rowling.

In no book does it say that high magic resistant beings are inkillable with the spell. So its safe to assume that they can be killed.

If he can't be hurt by magic then obviously Archimonde will win. The thread becomes pointless now.

Whoever human it hits. Based on how they needed more then eight wizards to put a dragon down, and that Hagred toke several of the same stun curses to his chest, well...

I asked if it ever had been tried in the books on a Giant ore a Dragon because frankly I don't recall.

He has magical shields as well so... and the Protego Curse from Harry in the last book deflected the spell so...

But yes he has magical immunity.

Originally posted by Utrigita
Whoever human it hits. Based on how they needed more then eight wizards to put a dragon down, and that Hagred toke several of the same stun curses to his chest, well...

I asked if it ever had been tried in the books on a Giant ore a Dragon because frankly I don't recall.

He has magical shields as well so... and the Protego Curse from Harry in the last book deflected the spell so...

But yes he has magical immunity.

The humans couldn't shoot the killing curse at the dragon because it is an illegal spell. Also, the killing curse is not the same as the stun curse. The stun spell stuns...the killing curse kills.

I merely noted that the Dragons required more magical energy to get affected then a Human would require.

Sorry, Archimonde has passive spell immunity.