Originally posted by Raptor22Raptor22, just ignore him. Your right about luke > bane but don't expect that guy to back down at all, he has an incredible obsession with a fictional character.
i dont have time tonight to negate welkin gunthers post i will tomorrow but i am confussed about 1 thing are welikn gunther, noesoeb, and fannus all the same person under different names
Just walk about from the debate, there is no shame in doing so against this guy.
Originally posted by Nebaris
3. Bane's comments that The Brotherhood were weak was based around their ideals, not each member's individual level of personal power. Quordis was clearly relatively powerful given his status among the Sith (head of the Academy, Kaan's right hand man after Kopekz) during such a martial era.
Bane disagrees:
"[...]my studies led to the conclusion that the Brotherhood, having amassed an army of thousands, had thinned the power of the dark side."
"The power of the dark side cannot be dispersed among the masses."
-- the Essential Guide to the Force, page 167.