Superman VS Neo

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
No, Superman is not faster than time. You are just being stupid now. If Superman were faster than time then he would be unstoppable, thus no need to make a movie about a giant boy in a big blue suit. The feats of speed that Superman displayed in all of his movies pale when compared to Neo's abilities in space and time manipulation. You are trying to introduce Comic canon and even then, sUperman is only as fast as the writers decide he needs to be. Superman cannot stop time, thus he is not faster than time. Neo, unlike Superman has actually displayed an ability close to being able to stop time.

Neo's speed is clocked mach 3.4, which is slow motion compared to Superman.

Neo's abilities to warp the Matrix are very limited based on what he has done. He is not omnipotent in the Matrix like you people make him out to be, not even nearing it.

Yeah, but Superman would [now] be restrained by his 'hero's clause', so he wouldn't go all out in fear of killing Neo, so his uber powers get uber-gimped. 🙁

Hm. You're right.

Also, using Routh's Superman, he would probably never even throw a punch.

The dick.

Dammit!

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Hm. You're right.

Also, using Routh's Superman, he would probably never even throw a punch.

The dick.

Dammit!

This retro-addition (what?) of the hero's clause now makes the majority of these past threads foolish.

Granted, I'm sure the person(s) who vehemently argued for it on the grounds that one of his boy-fantasy heroes couldn't win any other way unless said hero's opponent was gimped, would just as quickly do away with it, if it suited his needs in a different thread.

So someone has argued and succeeded at doing so to have a rule in place to gimp the opposition's characters(at least that is the true motive behind why he did it) so that he in turn would be able to succeed in an argument with the opposition, which would make him un-doubtedly a whiny-mrs. piss pants?

Yes.

PIS is now in affect a perfectly valid point in an argument.

I see.

Who is responsible for this so we can knee-cap him, cut off his testicles, gag him with them, and hang him with his disemboweled intestines?

RJ. ermm

I'll get the thw blow-torch and the tire iron.

Just read the Batman vs. Jango thread.

"Morality clause?"

The little scrote.

I was kicking ass up until the 2nd page, wher I had to leave to go to School.

I come back and there's been two more pages added and it's a cluster****. ermm

And the funny thing was that even with his hero's opponent gimped with said new clause, his hero STILL got his ass whipped anyway, thusly ruining the threads for no good reason whatsoever. A disgrace.

...and now he has actually followed that up by showing us how insincere he was about actually wanted morals to be in effect, by making his next thread "to the death".

Just look at the "Bob Lee Swagger Vs. Batman" as one example of the blantant clownery and twisting of unwritten rules to fit the immediate agenda.

As seen in the movies, Swagger isn't a murderer, so not sure how would could argue 'Bob Lee shoots Batman dead', since Bob Lee isn't willing to kill non-assholes, even if said non-assholes are trying to capture him, Bob has morals.

*adjusts waistband and tips hat*
Yip.. Yip... Yip.... Gotta love that morals rule.

It's not even a rule, it's a "I can't logically debate on how my preferred character would win and I have zero objectivity, so I'll pull it out when and only when it's convenient" card.

You're right.

Its lameness.

Not many heros or villians would want to kill an opponent they didnt know.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
*adjusts waistband and tips hat*
Yip.. Yip... Yip.... Gotta love that morals rule.

🙄

Oh yeah?

Well thats like.....your opinion, man.
It just compounds your perpetual wrongness.
Seriously despite your petty attacks, you mean what you know. Nothing.

Go on. Continue proving it with your every post.

Still.... *Takes remote and points at 'the pause button' as a reminder*

Just saying, man. Seems like arguments need to be dumbed down in order for you to get them. Adding a morality clause to stay true to the character is a good idea.

No that is an assumption you make, a hypocritical and flaming one too.
Its an opinion. Mine is that you make a bag of hammers look like einstein, but it might not neccesarily be true.

Stop dragging the abuse out man.

Pause.

Then the fighters would fight each other anyway, due to who they were.

They have no beef.