Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
This is really the only one that matters. It had a theatrical release, this is a movie versus forum, a movie is a movie, even if it totally destroys the storyline if its predecessors.
So "if it's in the movies it counts no matter what" is held to it's strictest, and all logic be damned?
Originally posted by RobtardI havent seen it, but its a movie, and even if it makes me puke I will acknowledge it has a place here, IMO.
I'm asking you, as you think the animated movie has many faults (Anakin's padawan etc) and does not follow [live] movie canon, yet think it should still be included despite said logical faults.So, what say you?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I havent seen it, but its a movie, and even if it makes me puke I will acknowledge it has a place here, IMO.
Edit: Then "in the movies" is how you should always debate, not matter how illogical or stupid a certain scene/instance might be compared to the rest of the film.
I dropped the 'flies wings' as just went with the dodging of the punch, as Spider-man having 5-times the reaction speed of a human is fairly reasonable compared to the rest of the film, while the wings bit was a bit too much. You should accept that fly scene as the 'greatest feat' though; logic be damned.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Wotcha, Impediment. 🙂Conflicts in Clone wars with the rest of proper SW movies.
And EU being cited as evidence in this discussion by the pro-Jedi folk, (not so much RJ, admittedly, in this instance, he seems to be trying as best as he can to go movie canon like us pro-spideys.)
You're saying that the EU has been used for reference in this thread?
You'll have to excuse my being misinformed here, but I just got off of work and am just now sitting down after a shower.