Batman vs. Jango Fett

Originally posted by Impediment
Enlighten me on the topic at hand. What's this about morality?

I'd post more, but I'm about to leave for work. I'll be back this afternoon.

It has been postulated here that Batman isn't allowed to kill Jango on moral grounds, staying true to Batman's moral ethos.

The opposing school of thought is that Batman, in a to-the-death scenario /should would be be free to kill his opponent willfully.

So do morals count, not just in this thread but in others also..?

Or can we just have it that they face off to the death..?

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth

Man. I used to think he was cool.

But minute by minute, Boba is starting to look like a total douche. 😖

That's the kick in the balls, he's supposed to be a bad-ass, Lucas is just an *******.

He shows us this guy who looks bad-ass, second only to Vader in this department, gives him the "greatest bounty hunter in the galaxy" moniker and puts him in the meanest looking ship (imo), so from the start, you think "hey, this guy is going to kick everyone's ass, sweet!" (at least when you're 7 you do, first Ep. IV it in 1980.)

Then Lucas goes about to subsequently write him as a bumbling clown who can't even capture his prey.

Ya'll niggas are gay.

And Jango wins.

I assure you that I'm neither a nigga or gay. You can suck on my pink penis and you'll see it doesn't get hard when your coco lips wrap around it.

Na, not likely, if you look at Jango's and Batman's movie feats objectively and you take into account that it's in Gotham.

P.S. PM me about that the blow-job; we'll set something up.

Originally posted by Robtard
I assure you that I'm neither a nigga or gay. You can suck on my pink penis and you'll see it doesn't get hard when your coco lips wrap around it.

Na, not likely, if you look at Jango's and Batman's movie feats objectively and you take into account that it's in Gotham.

P.S. PM me about that the blow-job; we'll set something up.

2. Well Jango can fly out of Batman's reach which would make his Batarang's his only real usable weapons(and the little blades in his forearm pads), the fact that Jango has a flamethrower to keep Batman from ever getting close, along with rockets, and the fact that he has a laser pistol of doom which can overwhelm a Jedi.

Hmmm, I could have sworn you said you were of the negro persuasion before, this is why I thought you had luscious and full coco lips.

This has been covered already. His grappling gun could anchor Jango, the Batarangs have decent range, and his Bat-suit is flame resistant, it's not like Batman is going to stand in one place while the flames just burn and burn away. Batman is adept at evading gun fire, which travels faster than the illogically slow laser fire of the SW universe. He also has the (huge) advantage of it being in Gotham, a city he knows and a multitude of buildings to duck into and countless high-story windows to attack from.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
1. Sir, I am in fact, a man of pale complexion, and find your racial slanders and assumptions offending. 131

2. Well Jango can fly out of Batman's reach which would make his Batarang's his only real usable weapons(and the little blades in his forearm pads), the fact that Jango has a flamethrower to keep Batman from ever getting close, along with rockets, and the fact that he has a laser pistol of doom which can overwhelm a Jedi.

Sure he can float away from Batman very slowly... 😛
Well...we saw the pistols overwhelm that ONE Jedi...
Batarangs'll do fine against that shitty pack.
And Batman's dealing-with-fire crudentials are well in order. 😮‍💨

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
It has been postulated here that Batman isn't allowed to kill Jango on moral grounds, staying true to Batman's moral ethos.

The opposing school of thought is that Batman, in a to-the-death scenario /should would be be free to kill his opponent willfully.

So do morals count, not just in this thread but in others also..?

Or can we just have it that they face off to the death..?

Well, TDK Batman won't kill. That's just how he is. However, if you remember from Batman Begins, he didn't kill Ra's Al Ghul, but he didn't save him, either.

If I had to pick an outcome for this fight, I'd have to go with Fett capturing Batman for a hypothetical bounty, or Bats subduing Fett long enough to disarm him and put him in Blackgate or Arkham, depending on his sentence.

Morals can count for a lot. I'll say that it'd be good to include a morality factor for future vs threads.

✅

Fair enough.

Well that'd make alot of these threads null.

Either way then, Bats whups Fett and sticks him in the clink.

Well, you don't have to have every single versus match to include a morality factor. I agree that it'd make a lot of the threads very blah.

My only point is that Batman is a moral person, is all. Jango Fett, however, is the polar opposite.

Indeed.

Whats at stake for Batman in this if he doesnt kill Jango, here...?

Will Jango kill everybody in Gotham somehow..?
If it was a scenario like that, would it not be forgivable for Batman to take him out...? (If Jango doesnt just 'come quietly', for example.)

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Fair enough.

Well that'd make alot of these threads null.

Either way then, Bats whups Fett and sticks him in the clink.

Stay true to the character.

But then again I suppose the thread starter should be able to specify differently. The biggest problem with versus threads is that the thread starter doesn't specify conditions clearly enough.

True, if that can be revised, then this could work.

I do like this section. It can be great fun.

I was gonna ask earlier, how would Batman disable Jango's jetpack? I a sure he would want to make sure there would be no explosion.

By batarang,
By pushing Jango over onto it like the reek did in AOTC,
By kicking or punching it,
By seperating Jango from it forcibly,
By poking it with a stick like Han did...?

There'll be many different ways.... As long as Batman isnt using armour piercing rounds or something, then disabling it without any explosions would be not only possible, but probably inevitable..

That minor kind of impact has been shown to cause damage that doesnt make the pack explode, but either triggers the pack at the user's wrong time, or just shuts it down...

Dunno how effective a Batarang would be.

Enough to mess with that pack, judging by how fragile they are in the movies.. Batarangs land with enough force to knock people out, don't they...?

And if they dont do the job, then any other form of impact'll do.

Well, you have to remember that the jetpack exploded in AOTC.

Yep after it was ripped free of Jango.

Besides if Jango dies in a firey jetpack explosion despite Batman's not-intending to to kill him, then fair play.