Originally posted by Endless Mike
Is there any proof Mordru could actually destroy a galaxy? Someone should post the scan afterwards when it shows that fireball and the damage it actually did
Mordru never got to unleash it because he got buried underground. (his plot-device weakness, though which he was constantly defeated)
Originally posted by Philosophía
Mordru never got to unleash it because he got buried underground. (his plot-device weakness, though which he was constantly defeated)
LOL. So he hasn't do it. But the you ignore the fact that Galactus and Agy were wrecking havoc to dimensions. Then went on to ignore MM and Beyonder's fight too.
Originally posted by Philosophía
Hyperbole based on what ? He was constantly written at very high levels, and like even the legionnaires said, the only reason they ever defeated him was due to his plot-device weakness. You're confusing him with Sentry.
Well he didn't destroy a galaxy and has yet to shown it. So yeah, hyperbole.
Galactus and Agy were wrecking dimensions, Oshtur and Hoggoth showed up because of it.
Originally posted by Philosophía
Galaxies destroying blast. Saying that it can't is unfounded aswell though. Truth is, galaxy busters could range from 2 galaxies to just short of Universal destroyers, so there's no certain way of knowing whether or not Celestials would or would be not defeated by Mordru's attack, even if they have withstood multiple-Galaxy destroying blasts.It all comes down to a matter of opinion.
Yes, it proves nothing, that's my point. I didn't do this thread to prove one side would win for sure and stomping. 😕
Originally posted by Bentley
Yes, it proves nothing, that's my point. I didn't do this thread to prove one side would win for sure and stomping. 😕
Your original post doesn't seem to mention anything about the Mordru we're using being Pre-Crisis though. (and I'm too lazy to see why it even got to the point where you're discussing him anyway) And if it's JSA Mordru, it really is a stomp.
Originally posted by Philosophía
Your original post doesn't seem to mention anything about the Mordru we're using being Pre-Crisis though. (and I'm too lazy to see why it even got to the point where you're discussing him anyway) And if it's JSA Mordru, it really is a stomp.
Lucky me, I didn't say JSA Mordru uhuh
Originally posted by WhiteWitchKingSo Tiamut can't destroy a solar system while weak because he hasn't done it and the statement must be hyperbole 😐. I guess the fanboys can't use that scan as proof anymore 😆
Well he didn't destroy a galaxy and has yet to shown it. So yeah, hyperbole.Galactus and Agy were wrecking dimensions, Oshtur and Hoggoth showed up because of it.
Originally posted by iceman24567
So Tiamut can't destroy a solar system while weak because he hasn't done it and the statement must be hyperbole 😐. I guess the fanboys can't use that scan as proof anymore 😆
Wait werent u the one a few pages back that was arguing against the use of statements of power to justify celestials powerlevel?
Originally posted by Naija boyNo that was only kinda funny because he was reaching I was actually laughing at the fact that Tiamuts only other real feat or statement of power isnt valid if are to debate by certain rules regarding statements of power.
In r above statement ur were laughing at someone for using the exact some logic against mordru. 😬
Originally posted by iceman24567
So Tiamut can't destroy a solar system while weak because he hasn't done it and the statement must be hyperbole 😐. I guess the fanboys can't use that scan as proof anymore 😆
LOL. Then don't. Mordru hasn't destroyed a galaxy and Tiamut hasn't shown to destroy a solar system while weak. But it did take the entire Celestial host to beat Tiamut. And Arishem did take an attack from 3 skyfathers who later bowed before him since they couldn't do a thing to him. And Odin has destroyed galaxies (his rival Surtur destroyed the burning galaxy as well).
So it's basically the Celestials are far above skyfathers and cube beings vs Mordru (who never really destroyed a galaxy) and his peers. LOL.
Celestials in an easy win.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaYes, you are quite sad.
That I am, sad at your inability to read (from a scan) and debate.