Originally posted by SoulDevourer
uh u sayin their made of iron & gravitons? 🤨
I think. 😬
Originally posted by Enyalusso basicly its made o pure neutrons? 🤨
Nah. IIRC my astronomy correctly, once the core of a star expends all of its helium and oxygen and carbon that its produced (once it has run out of hydrogen), it makes iron. But it can't fuse iron because its density is too high and thus the power required to do it is also too high. That's when a star goes nova. The remnant of that nova is a neutron star...compressed iron core of the star by gravity to create a star made of neutrons.I think. 😬
how do they know the temps inside it?
Originally posted by Enyalusbut they also got super high mass right? 1 cubic inch of the stuff is suppose to weight as much as Earth or something!
They probably measure the amount of light and energy it gives off. Neutron stars are only about 20 km in length.
edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_star
they say 10^11 to 10^12 k. dude thats way over the hottest blue stars
(but then it fall to "only" 1 million k. less then the sun but not exacly cold either 😛)
Originally posted by Harbinger
Enyalus: Renaissance Man.
"A neutron star is a type of remnant that can result from the gravitational collapse of a massive star during a Type II, Type Ib or Type Ic supernova event. Such stars are composed almost entirely of neutrons, which are subatomic particles without electrical charge and roughly the same mass as protons."
"Matter falling onto the surface of a neutron star would be accelerated to tremendous speed by the star's gravity. The force of impact would likely destroy the object's component atoms, rendering all its matter identical, in most respects, to the rest of the star. The gravitational field at the star's surface is about 2 × 1011 times stronger than on Earth. The escape velocity is about 100,000 km/s, which is about one third the speed of light. Such a strong gravitational field acts as a gravitational lens and bends the radiation emitted by the star such that parts of the normally invisible rear surface become visible."
"The temperature inside a newly formed neutron star is from around 1011 to 1012 Kelvin. However, the huge number of neutrinos it emits carries away so much energy that the temperature falls within a few years to around 1 million Kelvin. Even at 1 million Kelvin, most of the light generated by a neutron star is in X-rays."
"It is possible that atomic cores at the surface are iron nuclei, due to iron's high binding energy per nucleon....If the surface temperature exceeds 10^6 Kelvin (as in the case of a young pulsar), the surface should be fluid instead of the solid phase observed in cooler neutron stars (temperature <10^6 Kelvin)."
"The closest known neutron star is RX J185635-3754. Observations in 2000 using the Hubble Space Telescope show it to be about 200 light-years away in the southern constellation Corona Australis. While its surface temperature is 600,000 K, it radiates primarily in the X-Ray region."
See, Harb? Everything I said was true. 600,000K is nothing compared to regular yellow stars.
While its surface temperature is 600,000 K, it radiates primarily in the X-Ray region."[/i]? wait the suns surface temps only 5000k thats nothing next to 600000k *_*See, Harb? Everything I said was true. 600,000K is nothing compared to regular yellow stars. [/B]
what about the core of neutron star?
their not clear about it, first they say its 1000000k inside but then they say its 600000k at the surface - thats impossible cuz a star cores always a LOT hotter then its surface right? unless neutron stars an exeption 🤨
Originally posted by Enyalusno matter cuz we were talking about core temps anyways 😉
Heh. I admit defeat. Stupid mistake on my part.I'm gonna go and sulk now.
and dat article aint clear about it (IMO either their wrong about surface temp & its lot lower or their wrong about inside temp & its a lot higher 😕 )
Originally posted by SoulDevourer
? wait the suns surface temps only 5000k thats nothing next to 600000k *_*what about the core of neutron star?
their not clear about it, first they say its 1000000k inside but then they say its 600000k at the surface - thats impossible cuz a star cores always a LOT hotter then its surface right? unless neutron stars an exeption 🤨
1 million Kelvin is hotter than 600k Kelvin
Adamantium once cooled cannot change it's state. The heat may vaporise Logan's brain but if even one cell remained he'd regrow but no memories whatsoever Let's call that MAYBE SURVIVOR
Iron Man is like a clone/machine and Tony operates the shell from a ****in bunker so gur ge dur.
Hulk is invulnerable. SURVIVOR
Thor strangely can bleed from a punch from a heavy-hitter e.g. Hercules but can withstand entering the sun so wtf?!
Wonder Woman i know nothing about
Norrin has the power cosmic. SURVIVOR
Originally posted by peterporker
Adamantium once cooled cannot change it's state. The heat may vaporise Logan's brain but if even one cell remained he'd regrow but no memories whatsoever Let's call that MAYBE SURVIVORIron Man is like a clone/machine and Tony operates the shell from a ****in bunker so gur ge dur.
Hulk is invulnerable. SURVIVOR
Thor strangely can bleed from a punch from a heavy-hitter e.g. Hercules but can withstand entering the sun so wtf?!
Wonder Woman i know nothing about
Norrin has the power cosmic. SURVIVOR
Reported
Re: Who could survive Superman's Heat-vision Lobotomy?
Originally posted by Starscream M
Superman focuses his HV into extremely concentrated beams at the target's forehead for the duration of 10 seconds at full power. Who from the following could survive without becoming brain-dead?Wolverine
Iron Man
Hulk
Thor
Wonder Woman
Silver Surfer
Only Hulk. I doubt Superman's HV is accurate enough to hit the small brain. 😄
And Wolverine, because he is badass and has Adamantium.