President Obama 'orders Pakistan drone attacks'

To people like Kidrock, Obama can do nothing right. If he had stopped those strikes, he would be labeled a spineless leader who's unwilling to attack those who would harm America and/or a "terrorist appeaser."

Same goes for Guantanamo, if he had reneged on the order to close it, he would be labeled negatively.

Dude's been in office less than a week, wait for pattern to form before you start the scrutiny.

One positive of having Bush gone and Obama in office, seems the Muslim world lost a galvanizing anger-point now that Bush is gone. We'll see if it last.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28835452

Originally posted by Robtard
[B]To people like Kidrock, Obama can do nothing right. If he had stopped those strikes, he would be labeled a spineless leader who's unwilling to attack those who would harm America and/or a "terrorist appeaser."

Same goes for Guantanamo, if he had reneged on the order to close it, he would be labeled negatively.

Dude's been in office less than a week, wait for pattern to form before you start the scrutiny.

More what I was getting @. KidRock never mentioned any abuse of powers or questionable military actions of the Bush administration. No matter who is in charge, these things should be questioned so that we can even make a judgment of fair or unfair, lawful or unlawful, etc.

KidRock's goal is not to question the government but question a political party.

Originally posted by Robtard
To people like Kidrock, Obama can do nothing right. If he had stopped those strikes, he would be labeled a spineless leader who's unwilling to attack those who would harm America and/or a "terrorist appeaser."

Same goes for Guantanamo, if he had reneged on the order to close it, he would be labeled negatively.

Dude's been in office less than a week, wait for pattern to form before you start the scrutiny.

One positive of having Bush gone and Obama in office, seems the Muslim world lost a galvanizing anger-point now that Bush is gone. We'll see if it last.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28835452

Originally posted by chithappens
More what I was getting @. KidRock never mentioned any abuse of powers or questionable military actions of the Bush administration. No matter who is in charge, these things should be questioned so that we can even make a judgment of fair or unfair, lawful or unlawful, etc.

KidRock's goal is not to question the government but question a political party.

I eagerly await the both of you to point out where I said Obama attacking Al-Quaida inside Pakistan is a bad thing.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

Originally posted by KidRock
I eagerly await the both of you to point out where I said Obama attacking Al-Quaida inside Pakistan is a bad thing.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by KidRock
I eagerly await the both of you to point out where I said Obama attacking Al-Quaida inside Pakistan is a bad thing.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

So you mention this, why?

Originally posted by chithappens
So you mention this, why?

Because we are on a forum? Where things are discussed?

Originally posted by Robtard

Dude's been in office less than a week,

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28835452

Originally posted by chithappens

Cool, maybe you should make a thread about it..so we can discuss it.

So the US military conducting attacks on some other countries soil,
Not really a new novel amazingly surprising thing now is it.

As for Obama, whats he got to do with it? he´s just a puppet.

drones have been bombing inside Pakistan for at least 2 years now...

what am I missing?

Originally posted by inimalist
drones have been bombing inside Pakistan for at least 2 years now...

what am I missing?

That's why I don't understand what this is getting @

Originally posted by chithappens
That's why I don't understand what this is getting @

What I am getting at is why is Obama attacking Pakistani territory?

I thought he was different from Bush and a change..yet hes doing the same thing Bush did for the past 2 years.

Or is Obama a war monger like Bush was?

Originally posted by KidRock
What I am getting at is why is Obama attacking Pakistani territory?

I thought he was different from Bush and a change..yet hes doing the same thing Bush did for the past 2 years.

Or is Obama a war monger like Bush was?

Bush wasn't handed a war. Obama was, there's a huge difference.

Obama did end the block on federal funding for international abortion aid groups...

(I..I just thought I'd mention that somewhere...)

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Bush wasn't handed a war. Obama was, there's a huge difference.

Is it that difficult to say, "Hey guys, stop shooting missiles into Pakistan, technically we arent admitting it is us anyway"?

Originally posted by KidRock
Is it that difficult to say, "Hey guys, stop shooting missiles into Pakistan, technically we arent admitting it is us anyway"?

What does the Pakistani government think of this? If they are okay with it, then where's the problem in either administration?

However, I am one to just withdraw completely from the middle east.

Originally posted by KidRock
What I am getting at is why is Obama attacking Pakistani territory?

I thought he was different from Bush and a change..yet hes doing the same thing Bush did for the past 2 years.

Or is Obama a war monger like Bush was?

As people are pointing out hes hardly been in office for very long. Hell Sym made a joke about Obama hasnt done anything and I said thats just the sort of thing that Kidrock would say.....and here we are.

Originally posted by dadudemon
What does the Pakistani government think of this? If they are okay with it, then where's the problem in either administration?

However, I am one to just withdraw completely from the middle east.

the government OFFICIALLY isnt ok with it, but unofficially, all they really care about are the bribes they recieve in guised forms from america to not take any action against such attacks. more importantly the PEOPLE of pakistan are unanimously against it, and there is no evidence as of yet that ANY drone attacks inside pakistani soil have been succesfull in killing any known terrorists. quite the contrary, they happen indiscriminately inside population centres like villages and nearly all the victims end up being women and children, since the men are usually out working the farms and cattle//trasporting goods etc. and no, balochistan{the province where these attacks occur} is NOT ruled by the tribes as a seperate country at all, far from it, it is pretty much under government control.

but hey, who can stop the drones, seeing as the corrupt puppet leadership in this country under musharraf has already led vast military campaigns under orders from the american government , against villages in balochistan, which again ended up in the death of no known terrorists, but thousands of innocent teenagers and women and children.
its all about keeping the brainwashed first worl masses happy that SUMTHING IS BEING DONE!

so obama turns out to be a douche, what a surprise.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
the government OFFICIALLY isnt ok with it, but unofficially, all they really care about are the bribes they recieve in guised forms from america to not take any action against such attacks. more importantly the PEOPLE of pakistan are unanimously against it, and there is no evidence as of yet that ANY drone attacks inside pakistani soil have been succesfull in killing any known terrorists. quite the contrary, they happen indiscriminately inside population centres like villages and nearly all the victims end up being women and children, since the men are usually out working the farms and cattle//trasporting goods etc. and no, balochistan{the province where these attacks occur} is NOT ruled by the tribes as a seperate country at all, far from it, it is pretty much under government control.

but hey, who can stop the drones, seeing as the corrupt puppet leadership in this country under musharraf has already led vast military campaigns under orders from the american government , against villages in balochistan, which again ended up in the death of no known terrorists, but thousands of innocent teenagers and women and children.
its all about keeping the brainwashed first worl masses happy that SUMTHING IS BEING DONE!

so obama turns out to be a douche, what a surprise.

Because civilians in any other country apart from America are collateral damage. In America, however, killing them is terrorism.

Gosh, keep up.

Originally posted by KidRock
What I am getting at is why is Obama attacking Pakistani territory?

I thought he was different from Bush and a change..yet hes doing the same thing Bush did for the past 2 years.

Or is Obama a war monger like Bush was?

I'd say yes

he made it quite clear from at least the first debate that he was going to intensify the wars in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Anyone thinking he was going to change that wasn't paying attention.