Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Buddha had the same problem. However, he developed expedient means to bring people out of the darkness of delusion. Only then could he teach his higher teachings.
But at its simplist core, wasnt Buddha just a man teaching people how to act to each other?
Please forgive my lack of knowledge of Buddhism but I take it unlike most religions there is no "ours is the right one and if you believe otherwise bad things will happen to you" clause?
I'd much rather hear:
"Be nice to each other"
than...
"Be nice to each other or my dad will kick the crap out of you"
Originally posted by Beliver
But at its simplist core, wasnt Buddha just a man teaching people how to act to each other?Please forgive my lack of knowledge of Buddhism but I take it unlike most religions there is no "ours is the right one and if you believe otherwise bad things will happen to you" clause?
I'd much rather hear:
"Be nice to each other"
than...
"Be nice to each other or my dad will kick the crap out of you"
And "Be nice to each other" is the higher teachings of Buddha. However, no one around him could understand that. They were too delusional. Consider Jesus; his teachings were "Be nice to each other" and all he got for it was a cross.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
And "Be nice to each other" is the higher teachings of Buddha. However, no one around him could understand that. They were too delusional. Consider Jesus; his teachings were "Be nice to each other" and all he got for it was a cross.
So would Jesus of been okay if he just stuck to walking around saying "be nice to each other" instead of spouting off that he was the son of a deity?
Originally posted by Beliver
Really?I would of thought a kicking at most. I guessed telling everyone that unless they did what he said his magic daddy is the clouds will get them would of pissed off more people.
Try it yourself. At best everyone will laugh at you; at worse, they will bust your head open.
The 1995 incident:
"Seeking to explain the phenomenon, scientists from India's Ministry of Science and Technology travelled to a temple in New Delhi and made an offering of milk containing a food colouring. As the level of liquid in the spoon dropped, it became obvious that after the milk disappeared from the spoon, it coated the statue beneath where the spoon was placed. With this result, the scientists offered capillary action as an explanation; the surface tension of the milk was pulling the liquid up and out of the spoon, before gravity caused it to run down the front of the statue."
Or the 2006 one?
Originally posted by Beliver
The 1995 incident:"Seeking to explain the phenomenon, scientists from India's Ministry of Science and Technology travelled to a temple in New Delhi and made an offering of milk containing a food colouring. As the level of liquid in the spoon dropped, it became obvious that after the milk disappeared from the spoon, it coated the statue beneath where the spoon was placed. With this result, the scientists offered capillary action as an explanation; the surface tension of the milk was pulling the liquid up and out of the spoon, before gravity caused it to run down the front of the statue."
Or the 2006 one?
I never said Miracles are real outside of the mind.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The rational is not free from the possibility of delusion.
But with the rational the delusional can be isolated and ignored.
Its the irrational that act upon the delusion.
Havent heard of many MIT scholars shaving all their hair off and claiming to be the next coming of the Messiah. Although it always seems to be the leaders of nations that seem to have the ear of God.