Originally posted by h1a8
I don't even think that Thanos is 100,000 tons strong. There is simply no proof to even put him in Orion's league in physical strength. I totally disagree that the power gem increases durabillity.
The force of Thanos and Drax grappling caused the planet they were fighting on to implode. After which Drax was KO'd and Thanos was perfectly fine. That'd indicate that Thanos's strength had to be at least half responsible for such power. What can your calculations tell me about that? How much strength would it take for a planet to explode without even striking it?
Originally posted by Enyalus
The force of Thanos and Drax grappling caused the planet they were fighting on to implode. After which Drax was KO'd and Thanos was perfectly fine. That'd indicate that Thanos's strength had to be at least half responsible for such power. What can your calculations tell me about that? How much strength would it take for a planet to explode without even striking it?
Thank you for quoting him friend. I laughed my ass off the first time I read that and thanks to you quoting it, I did so again for all the office to hear lol.
Originally posted by Enyalus
The force of Thanos and Drax grappling caused the planet they were fighting on to implode. After which Drax was KO'd and Thanos was perfectly fine. That'd indicate that Thanos's strength had to be at least half responsible for such power. What can your calculations tell me about that? How much strength would it take for a planet to explode without even striking it?
I would like to see this scan of what you are talking about.
Also tell me issue numbers too.
Originally posted by Enyalus
Happens in Iron Man 55, IIRC.
Seems like the energy flowing from the two caused it.
Not pure physical strength though. Also significantly disrupting the ebbs and tides of a planet will cause it to be destroyed. This is like pulling on the trigger of a gun with a small amount of force yet the bullet does a much larger amount of force.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos was also much weaker at the time of this feat. Why do you always argue against characters you know next to nothing about.
Why do you say this when I actually asking for information and not arguing?
Next time save this comment for when I'm indeed arguing.
Lastly, I know more than what you think about Thanos. That is why I am bold enough to say that there is no proof that Thanos is even 100,000 ton strong (pure strength).
Originally posted by h1a8
Seems like the energy flowing from the two caused it.
Not pure physical strength though.
That's artist depiction. They're clearly grappling hand-to-hand, and the force from it caused the planet to bust. So, how much strength would that take? Then cut it in half, and you have a bare minimum of what original Thanos can lift. And Thanos has had multiple upgrades since.
Originally posted by h1a8
But many comics do show the truth of what I say. For example, Spider-man has many times knocked around a much stronger opponent with ease. Some comics do and some don't. Who of significance has Thanos knocked senseless with a mere swat? You know what senseless means right? Not true. Hulk is not that fast. Spiderman can easily knock Hulk into a wall. It would take Hulk several moments to get back. Pimp smacking Hulk only proves that Thanos has super strength. It doesn't prove that he has class 100 strength though (even though I believe he has). I don't even think that Thanos is 100,000 tons strong. There is simply no proof to even put him in Orion's league in physical strength. I totally disagree that the power gem increases durabillity.
over
