Hulk vs Darkseid

Started by KuRuPT Thanosi18 pages

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Supes does have a healing factor.

And going by feats, yes he can. 😉

Kurupt: There's a tier system for a reason. And punches that rock high heralds will kill Hulk. Superman having higher durability is pure fact. Omega Effect, Entropy, Henshaw, Wondy's tiara, Zoom's punches, Supernovas, planets exploding, Superman tanks things that would kill any Hulk. Stop being deluded. 😬 Logic works, fanboyism doesn't.

So, again you have no proof on panel that supports or shows Supes or DS knocking someone's head off let alone someone with the stats of hulk. Furthermore, you clam that supes durability is so much greater then hulks that the shots he's taken from DS would've knock hulks head off in one shot 👇

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
you know what? Spetz was right. You are the garbage of evolution, the crap at the bottom of the primordial soup that stayed in the muck. Stop bothering evolved lifeforms. g_grin
And yet he is able to put forth his argument without the need to insult.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Never said Superman's was at Hulk's level. Just that he has one.

Fanboyism. When Hulk moves worlds, then talk. Otherwise, STFU.

Do I really have to bring out scans demonstrating Superman's higher durability? 😬 AND FOR THE LAST TIME, HEALING FACTOR IS NOT DURABILITY.

Gladiator is a chump, and there was mitigation in that fight. Glads was fighting like a moron and Hulk exploited his radiation weakness, either by gamma or nuclear radiation.

you know what? Spetz was right. You are the garbage of evolution, the crap at the bottom of the primordial soup that stayed in the muck. Stop bothering evolved lifeforms. g_grin

Hulk can't fly. Feats have done the talking for me. He launched himself into an asteroid twice the size of earth while Supes got laid out by the moon.

Gladiator isn't a chump and that isn't how you debate. Hulk was doing fine on his own before he used radiation.

Figures you would take a cheapshot here because you have always looked up to sptz who just rambles on and makes meaningless posts. The guy can't even string together a decent argument and it took him four consecutive posts to bash me. 😂

Originally posted by Mindset
And yet he is able to put forth his argument without the need to insult.
👆

Originally posted by Mindset
And yet he is able to put forth his argument without the need to insult.

Not relly. It appears even Spetz has reached his limits in dealing with Quan. 😬

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=11638348&highlight=userid%3A55774#post11638348

"Debating with Quanchi is useless. He cannot think himself out of anything more complicated than a 1+1 linear type situation.

In his mind everything is two guys facing each other and getting into a boxing match.

There should be minimum standards for posting, or alternatively tags put below posters names to make new members realize which ones actually debate, and which ones are allowed to post only as comic relief.

People like quanchi have their purpose (i.e. comic relief), but the problem is the consider themselves actual serious posters."

"Quanchi must have some cranial disease ....since I also have that comic, and I agree with you.

It was MM who used his HV to quite literally melt BA's face half off!

But hey ....Quanchi's brain tumor makes him see his own things!"

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Not relly. It appears even Spetz has reached his limits in dealing with Quan. 😬

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=11638348&highlight=userid%3A55774#post11638348

"Debating with Quanchi is useless. He cannot think himself out of anything more complicated than a 1+1 linear type situation.

In his mind everything is two guys facing each other and getting into a boxing match.

There should be minimum standards for posting, or alternatively tags put below posters names to make new members realize which ones actually debate, and which ones are allowed to post only as comic relief.

People like quanchi have their purpose (i.e. comic relief), but the problem is the consider themselves actual serious posters."

"Quanchi must have some cranial disease ....since I also have that comic, and I agree with you.

It was MM who used his HV to quite literally melt BA's face half off!

But hey ....Quanchi's brain tumor makes him see his own things!"

So you post a link where someone bashes me? Mindset already saw this. It's like you want to get in trouble.

Like I give a shit. 🙄 You won, dipshit. You succeeded in trashing the forum and bringing everyone down to your level.

You misunderstood me, I was talking about Quan.

We are discussing comic book characters, let's keep some perspective, no need to bash someone.

Not that I haven't done it, but when I do it it's funny.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Like I give a shit. 🙄 You won, dipshit. You succeeded in trashing the forum and bringing everyone down to your level.
I don't want to trash the forum. You always blame me for everything. Let's get back to topic. These exchanges hurt the forum. Let's try to avoid these and stick to debating comic book characters.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk can't fly. Feats have done the talking for me. He launched himself into an asteroid twice the size of earth while Supes got laid out by the moon.

It was an energy moon. Human sized constructs made of the material have good durability feats. It's the equivalent of taking out a moon sized green lantern construct.

Hulk got knocked out by iron man's jet pack exploding. Let's not use low feats shall we?

Originally posted by Galvaclaw
It was an energy moon. Human sized constructs made of the material have good durability feats. It's the equivalent of taking out a moon sized green lantern construct.

Hulk got knocked out by iron man's jet pack exploding. Let's not use low feats shall we?

If I went gas station that would be low balling. I was comparing both collisions to one another. To say that Hulk doesn't have Superman's strength feats and what not is just wrong. That was my point. I gave a direct comparison as best I could. Most of their strength feats aren't comparable as these characters end up in compltely different and unique situations.

Idealistically speaking, Hulk could get strong enough to get a win, the likelyhood of that, is far less than Superman's chances against Darkseid.

Here, Hulk is not Superman, he's not Superman's equal in nearly any sense of the word, save maybe a few dynamics of physical prowess when he's peaking. When he accomplishes this fairly rare level[by comparison], he can do things with power Superman does every arc.

Here, he has no outside help, no real knowledge of his opponent, no plan and no tacticle advantage, as Superman typically does when he does well against Darkseid.

He's just dropped into a battle against one of the most powerful and cunning beings the universe has to offer.

Just because the fight stupulations are slanted in Hulk's favor, do I give him any real plausibility of winning, however I fully believe his chances of getting to Darkseid's level are not very good. And even when he manages it, he'd still be scraping by.

Originally posted by Galvaclaw
It was an energy moon. Human sized constructs made of the material have good durability feats. It's the equivalent of taking out a moon sized green lantern construct.

Hulk got knocked out by iron man's jet pack exploding. Let's not use low feats shall we?

Good luck with that 😆 . Darkseid wins the majority.

Originally posted by Galvaclaw
It was an energy moon. Human sized constructs made of the material have good durability feats. It's the equivalent of taking out a moon sized green lantern construct.

Hulk got knocked out by iron man's jet pack exploding. Let's not use low feats shall we?

So is it a low feat or not.

Seems like you can't make up your mind.

It's only a low feat in comparison to Superman's high end feats like planet moving or warping reality by singing.

It's also a largely unquantifiable feat as the moon wasn't made of rock but solid energy which harder to categorise.

Originally posted by Galvaclaw
It's only a low feat in comparison to Superman's high end feats like planet moving or warping reality by singing.

It's also a largely unquantifiable feat as the moon wasn't made of rock but solid energy which harder to categorise.

If it's a largely unquantifiable feat, how can it be a low feat?

Originally posted by Galvaclaw
It was an energy moon. Human sized constructs made of the material have good durability feats. It's the equivalent of taking out a moon sized green lantern construct.

Hulk got knocked out by iron man's jet pack exploding. Let's not use low feats shall we?

In Crisis on Infinite Earths, Earth 2 Superman/Kal L, when fighting Anti-Monitor, grabbed a moon as a method of attack, and threw it at the Anti-Monitor, then grabbed two giant astroids, one for each hand and clapped them into the Anti-Monitor so hard it flung AM 2 million miles through space, and as his body slammed into a planet, Superman was already on top of him, wielding another giant astroid or moon.

In Infinite Crisis, our Superman/Kal El, fought Kal L to nearly a complete standstill.

Later in the same story, our Kal El, and Kal L, flew Superboy Prime through a red star, then landed in kryptonite that was killing only Kal El, as the other two were from another universe and thus uneffected by this... and he still stood up after Kal L went down, and proceeded to end the fight against Prime. Yes, they were all fairly powered down, drained, but Kal El had kryptonite affecting him, and still had deeper reserves than Prime or Kal L.

Because its used as one.

Originally posted by Galvaclaw
Because its used as one.
That doesn't make any sense.

Originally posted by Mindset
That doesn't make any sense.
The social stigma of the event in question. Weather it's a low feat or not, people using it as one, lumps it categorically with other similarly used representations. "Low feat".