Thanos vs. Flash, Black Adam, Captain Comet(Classic) and Wonder Woman

Started by fangirl10110 pages

Originally posted by Naija boy
Hmm. it seems that making baseless claims and telling evryone who asks u to actually prove them "ur on ignore" has become a debating strategy.ermm
Shut the hell up. I didn't make a baseless claim. Thano's tech sheilds have always been clear and surround his entire body. His energy shields have always been circular and never covered his body. Period. What we have witht he drax thing is something out of the norm.

Originally posted by fangirl101
what the hell does it look like to you? You are back on ignore. You know it's only circular in front of his hand.
The energy is all around him. LOL at anyone saying Thanos' backside is wide open to attacks.
Originally posted by Naija boy
Hmm. it seems that making baseless claims and telling evryone who asks u to actually prove them "ur on ignore" has become a debating strategy.ermm
😂

Originally posted by fangirl101
You won't find an instance where he is covered in his colored energy shields. You won't. Screw pressing a button. You know damned well they won't show that all of the time. You are on ignore.

Well if he's not pressing a button or something every time he raises a full body shield, then what are you basing the shield in question being tech based off of beyond the standard you yourself set up for him in which any full body shield is always tech based? Is there ANY actual proof to support the claim or not?

Originally posted by darthgoober
Well if he's not pressing a button or something every time he raises a full body shield, then what are you basing the shield in question being tech based off of beyond the standard you yourself set up for him in which any full body shield is always tech based? Is there ANY actual proof to support the claim or not?
How about I"ve seen enough of his tech shields to know that they are clear and surround him fully. Examples include, Omega, Galactus, Champion etc.

When he uses his own energy shields, they don't surround him fully and are colored by his energy aura.

Example includes The fallen one.

Good night.

As for this thread. Toss up.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Shut the hell up. I didn't make a baseless claim. Thano's tech sheilds have always been clear and surround his entire body. His energy shields have always been circular and never covered his body. Period. What we have witht he drax thing is something out of the norm.
Why can't you answer anyone's question with anything other than your opinion to back this claim up?

The Drax shield was an energy shield and is canon so it counts and destroys your theory.

Originally posted by fangirl101
As for this thread. Toss up.
👆

Originally posted by kgkg
👆
How so?

Originally posted by fangirl101
How about I"ve seen enough of his tech shields to know that they are clear and surround him fully. Examples include, Omega, Galactus, Champion etc.

When he uses his own energy shields, they don't surround him fully and are colored by his energy aura.

Example includes The fallen one.

Good night.

As for this thread. Toss up.

And all those examples actually prove is that Thanos CAN make full body shields using tech, and that he CAN raise shields from his own personal energy that aren't full body. You're relying on conjectured opinion for pretty much everything else...

Originally posted by fangirl101
Shut the hell up. I didn't make a baseless claim. Thano's tech sheilds have always been clear and surround his entire body. His energy shields have always been circular and never covered his body. Period. What we have witht he drax thing is something out of the norm.

lulz. Yes and im sure u have some way of proving that......Oh wait u dont. All the proven "tech" shield incidents have thanos giving verbal commands to activate the shields. Aside those times thanos has used shields on numerous occasions. You have ABSOLUTELY NO WAY of proving that any of the other times he used shields( which did surround his or another beings body) have been tech shields. Further u have no way of proving that the shields thanos used which only covered parts of his body were made because of his inability to do so over his entire body rather than his own decision to use shields only to protect the part of his being in danger.

So um yeah u can make all the blanket statements u like it as it supports ur nonsensical argument in no way as its still as baseless speculation.

Originally posted by darthgoober
And all those examples actually prove is that Thanos CAN make full body shields using tech, and that he CAN raise shields from his own personal energy that aren't full body. You're relying on conjectured opinion for pretty much everything else...
Well since this is comics and that is what we do, then take it or leave it. I'm done with you. I don't even like your style.

Originally posted by Naija boy
lulz. Yes and im sure u have some way of proving that......Oh wait u dont. All the proven "tech" shield incidents have thanos giving verbal commands to activate the shields. Aside those times thanos has used shields on numerous occasions. You have ABSOLUTELY NO WAY of proving that any of the other times he used shields( which did surround his or another beings body) have been tech shields. Further u have no way of proving that the shields thanos used which only covered parts of his body were made because of his inability to do so over his entire body rather than his own decision to use shields only to protect the part of his being in danger.

So um yeah u can make all the blanket statements u like it as it supports ur nonsensical argument in no way as its still as baseless speculation.

Lulz. you fail. I don't have to prove shit. That's like me saying prove that Superman can lift ten elephants and a mouse. When he's never done so. I know he can from what I've seen. Thanos has never surrounded himself with his own energy fields. But he has sourouned himself with tech. That's all I need to know.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Well since this is comics and that is what we do, then take it or leave it. I'm done with you. I don't even like your style.

I can understand why you're not a fan of my style because I rely on proof rather than making shit up as I go along. You should get used to it though because forum rules support my way of debating, not yours.

Originally posted by fangirl101
Well since this is comics and that is what we do, then take it or leave it. I'm done with you. I don't even like your style.
The Drax shield destroys your theory though.
Originally posted by fangirl101
Lulz. you fail. I don't have to prove shit. That's like me saying prove that Superman can lift ten elephants and a mouse. When he's never done so. I know he can from what I've seen. Thanos has never surrounded himself with his own energy fields. But he has sourouned himself with tech. That's all I need to know.
Drax shield while his back was turned by the way.

Originally posted by darthgoober
I can understand why you're not a fan of my style because I rely on proof rather than making shit up as I go along. You should get used to it though because forum rules support my way of debating, not yours.
No. I don't like your style becuz you fvking annoy me. I stated what has happened on panel. **** what you think I meant. I stated what has happened on panel. Thanos shields of tech are always clear and surround him. Period. Now get lost chump.

is it really necessary to use words like "fail"?

Originally posted by fangirl101
No. I don't like your style becuz you fvking annoy me. I stated what has happened on panel. **** what you think I meant. I stated what has happened on panel. Thanos shields of tech are always clear and surround him. Period. Now get lost chump.

He says while relying upon his own conjecture without a lick of proof to support the claim...

Originally posted by fangirl101
No. I don't like your style becuz you fvking annoy me. I stated what has happened on panel. **** what you think I meant. I stated what has happened on panel. Thanos shields of tech are always clear and surround him. Period. Now get lost chump.
Thanos' shields when used against Drax weren't clear and covered his backside while he wasn't even engaging Drax. There goes your theory.

Originally posted by kgkg
is it really necessary to use words like "fail"?

Saying "fail" and ur on "ignore" have seemingly become a substitute for on panel proof.

Originally posted by darthgoober
He says while relying upon his own conjecture without a lick of proof to support the claim...
I'm a fvking She. for the trillionth time. I stated what has happened on panel. Now if you feel i'm wrong, dispute it with examples or shut up.

Originally posted by fangirl101
I'm done with you. I don't even like your style.
😂