Neo(Revolutions) vs. Superman(Returns)

-Battle takes place in the same place Neo fought Smith.

who takes this?

Matrix fights do not bode well here.

Neo wins, he's note stronger, but he was shown to be just as fast as superman and he is A LOT more skilled.

Superman every time.

Originally posted by Trackz
Neo wins, he's note stronger, but he was shown to be just as fast as superman and he is A LOT more skilled.

Superman was so fast he appeared to be in mutliple places around the world at the same time.

Neo is merely mach 3-4.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Just as fast? Funny.

Superman was so fast he appeared to be in mutliple places around the world at the same time.

Neo is merely mach 3-4.

Originally posted by Trackz
he never did that in superman returns

Yes, he did.

He was also stated at being at the speed of light.....

Why, just why?

Supes stomps

That movie made Superman return gay.

Neo wins.

Originally posted by Nemesis X
That movie made Superman return gay.

Neo wins.

No. He loses.

Originally posted by Draco69
Yes, he did.

He was also stated at being at the speed of light.....

He flew from Krypton to Earth, and flew through a black hole.

This debate is going to be so much longer than it needs to be.

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
He flew from Krypton to Earth, and flew through a black hole.

Lol... Speculations keep being presented as if they were facts.

1. Superman has been estimated to be close to the speed of light.

- There are several instances which indicate he is nowhere near light speed. Maybe its due to PIS, maybe not.

2. Superman Flying through a blackhole.

- Purely speculation on some very weak and ambiguous evidence, if any.

3. Neo is only Mach 3 - 4.

- Neo has been confirmed to be at least mach 3-4 in one instance. He has other feats to suggest he can fly much quicker.

. . .

As for the topic at hand, No man that can have blood drawn from him by a mere sword strike can stand up against the Man of Steel.

It wouldn't be much of a fight at all.

Originally posted by Placidity

- Purely speculation on some very weak and ambiguous evidence, if any.

The movie shows it.

So no.

Well I would call it ambitious speculation on your part.

I don't think you'll find a single source that supports that claim. I don't think anyone else here would accept your speculation either. Its far too open for interpretation to be used as if it were solid fact.

... besides the fact hat it's shown the movie?

Thats the point. You think it "shows" it.

I know it does.

That's like you saying I think Superman's costume has blue in it. No... the movie shows that it has blue.