Originally posted by leonheartmm
the panel is wrong.
I once asked you to provide a source for your definition, which you didn't do. Yet you have the nerve to continue rambling about how the panel statement--even after it has been reiterated time after time--is inaccurate.
That is an act of trolling.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
Didn't Mxy say he is going to hang out with his four fantastic friends?
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiThat event (where Mxy impersonated IM) actually happened in a DC comic, but was still referenced in IM's official Marvel bio. The other event (where Mxy and IM interract) happened in a Mavel/DC crossover, and was also referenced in IM's official Marvel bio.
yea he also said it was blubbering time and other such things. yet it's still not canon because mr. m. didn't like the story :-/ oh well.
mxy feats > hom wanda feats on panel. And since mxy remembers everything he does in every other comic I would assume it should make it canon.
But yeah, apparently Marvel just gathers random happenings and throws them into their official bios to help fill the page (regardless of canonicity.) Apparently, their bios aren't much more reliable than Wiki.
Bastards. ermm
Originally posted by Galan007
That event (where Mxy impersonated IM) actually happened in a DC comic, but was still referenced in IM's official Marvel bio. The other event (where Mxy and IM interract) happened in a Mavel/DC crossover, and was also referenced in IM's official Marvel bio.But yeah, apparently Marvel just gathers random happenings and throws them into their official bios to help fill the page (regardless of canonicity.) Apparently, their bios aren't much more reliable than Wiki.
Bastards. ermm
Originally posted by Galan007The crossover is specifically mentioned in IM's official Marvel bio,
yet it's non-canon?
Mxy has nothing to do with Marvel cosmology, so yea, its non-canon.
On top of that,
none of the references in IM's bio mentioned Mxy's actual name either,
sure there are allusions to it being him, (mixed pickels or whatever)
but if it were truly canon, then his real name would be included.
Also, try and find any of those indirect references in the FF bio,
or any of the FF individual bios, or even Silver Surfer's bio,
or any bio whatsoever in any Handbook whatsoever outside of IM's bio.
Ga head and try.
What you will find is that only IM's bio makes that subtle reference.
And why is that?
Cause only concerning IM does Mxy have any significance in Marvel,
and cause like Stan lee's avatar stated on panel, IM is a rip off of Mxy.
He also stated, that Marvel fans complained cause like Mxy,
IM is a joke, and not meant to be taken seriously.
Again:
The only reason a subtle vague reference is mention in IM's bio,
is because IM's historical data is minute,
so in order to give it more spice, they included every event involving IM,
including the cross-over with Mxy,
including connecting a relationship between IM & Mxy (DC reference in IM's bio)
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiSo Mister M. it's only canon if you consider it to be?
This is interesting.
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiAnd Mxys feat are greater than Wandas, unless of course we don't consider any of his feats canon because you didn't like them?
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiThe difference is Mxy's feats were made out in a comical way, and wandas in a dangerous way. You seem to not comprehend the difference in the way the characters are written though being as I've tried to have this conversation with you before.
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiSo we'll just have to agree to disagree on anything Mxy related.
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiI do have a question though how would Wanda kill mxy? Mxy has to give up all his powers to be able to die, and even then he came back to life.
I then said,
if we dismiss World's Funnest as the Editor in-Chief of DC did,
then Wanda wins, and easily at that.
If we consider World's Funnest,
then they stalemate, because both displayed the same kinda scope of influence.
Originally posted by Galan007I'd actually say that's a pretty accurate assessment. srug
But yeah, apparently Marvel just gathers random happenings and throws them into their official bios to help fill the page (regardless of canonicity.) Apparently, their bios aren't much more reliable than Wiki.Bastards. ermm
Originally posted by Mr Master
I never said that,
so stop trying to make for yourself a reputation that spells out bull shitThere's nothing that Mxy has done, that places him above Wanda.
This sanctimonious babble is hilarious.
I don't have a problem with that.
I never said Wanda would kill Mxy,
I never even suggested how Wanda would beat him,
I simply stated my opinion,
I said Wanda defeats Mxy, period.I then said,
if we dismiss World's Funnest as the Editor in-Chief of DC did,
then Wanda wins, and easily at that.If we consider World's Funnest,
then they stalemate, because both displayed the same kinda scope of influence.
you sir are hilarious. Was wandas powers shown to be so much more than EJ? And you're saying Wanda defeats mxy...without saying how? So we know she can't kill him, she can't bfr him, so how exactly does win? We know mxy can exist in the absence of reality....when was it ever shown that wanda could? And still it is amazingly entertaining to me how you can't tell the difference in the way DC portrays Mxy and the way they portray other characters. I think you do but you just want to argue. I'm pretty sure there's no one on this board who thinks DC portrays Mxy as a menacing creature. If they did I think they wouldn't be using him painting his face blue and things like that as a way to defeat a being who can blink everything out of existence. But like i said we agree to disagree b/c despite the on panel proof you are just going to keep low balling mxy.
Originally posted by MindsetI'd actually say that's a pretty accurate assessment.
Originally posted by Galan007apparently Marvel just gathers random happenings and throws them into their official bios to help fill the page (regardless of canonicity.)
Then you can make a statement like that with weight behind it.
Until then ... 😛
Originally posted by Mr Master
👆 ... (except for Marvel handbooks equating to Wiki garbage.Just let me know when you find any nameless subtle indirect reference to Mxy
in any other bio aside from IM's.Then you can make a statement like that with weight behind it.
Until then ... 😛
Originally posted by Galan007Actually... it was a combination of Parallax expending his energy creating a plasma universe template, an assault by Waverider's entire team of heroes, Spectre's attack, more heroes assaulting him after Spectre was out of the picture and eventually Ollie's arrow that ultimately beat him.
Parallax blasted Spectre, sure. But at the end, it was Spectre who ultimately beat him and reset everything.
Then Spectre reappeared and pumped more power into Damage who had already absorbed the plasma universe template to create a new Big Bang to restore everything.
biscuits
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiyou sir are hilarious.
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiWas wandas powers shown to be so much more than EJ?
Then Wanda rebuilt the Omniverse, remade 616 once again
and nullified the mutant gene from 90% of the population across all Timelines.
(with a thought btw)
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiAnd you're saying Wanda defeats mxy...without saying how? So we know she can't kill him, she can't bfr him, so how exactly does win?
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiWe know mxy can exist in the absence of reality....
when was it ever shown that wanda could?
He can exist outside of reality? ... Really ... oh my ... he's God.
LOL!!!
Warlock, the Fury, heck freakin Reed Richards, amongst others
even MJJ while powerless can exist outside of reality
Is this a joke?
Originally posted by LDHZenkaiAnd still it is amazingly entertaining to me how you can't tell the difference in the way DC portrays Mxy and the way they portray other characters. I think you do but you just want to argue. I'm pretty sure there's no one on this board who thinks DC portrays Mxy as a menacing creature. If they did I think they wouldn't be using him painting his face blue and things like that as a way to defeat a being who can blink everything out of existence. But like i said we agree to disagree b/c despite the on panel proof you are just going to keep low balling mxy.
But when clownish reasoning is used to debate like:
"Mxy visited the real world,"
or "Mxy has power over all time/space in Marvel"
because of a silly cross-over appearance where he did nothing special,
I have to step up to the plate and make my mind known.
Originally posted by Mr MasterMxy was referenced a few times in IM's official Marvel bio. So he apparently does have something to do with Marvel cosmology, at some level (however minute it may be.)
Mxy has nothing to do with Marvel cosmology, so yea, its non-canon.
Originally posted by Mr MasterSo now a character has to be mentioned in more than one official Marvel bio for their appearance to be canonical?
Just let me know when you find any nameless subtle indirect reference to Mxy
in any other bio aside from IM's.Then you can make a statement like that with weight behind it.
Gotcha. 👆
Originally posted by Galan007Do you remember Scathan?
Mxy was referenced a few times in IM's official Marvel bio. So he apparently does have something to do with Marvel cosmology, at some level (however minute it may be.)So now a character has to be mentioned in more than one official Marvel bio for their appearance to be canonical?
Gotcha. 👆