The General Discussion Thread

Started by Morning_Glory22,321 pages

🙂

🙁

Originally posted by Morning_Glory
I’m ready for a woman president

The truth is the vast majority of people wouldn't be offended by a woman president or by a gay president.

So if a woman fails to become president it's not because she is a woman. Just like if a gay person fails it isn't because they are gay.

Nationalism is only seen as a bad concept because of World War II, and the convenient slanting of fascism as the "bad guy". When, like all of history, there were many dangerous ideas going on at once. As Russia was not our enemy, communism and by extension Marxism was not taught as the social poison it is. If the enemy were Russia, and by extension communism, and Germany / Italy were our allies, our universities may well by now be infested with fascists by now instead.

Originally posted by Morning_Glory
I’m ready for a woman president
We've had two female prime ministers and they were both awful, like the majority of prime ministers. Just hope for a good president instead of one whose arbitrary identity seems aesthetically pleasing.

Originally posted by Surtur
Actually yeah you have a point. Thinking all cultures are equal could be a sign you're uneducated. Or it could be a sign you were just educated at a college in America.

Zing!

Or the UK. We got it too, bruv.

Originally posted by Scribble
Nationalism is only seen as a bad concept because of World War II, and the convenient slanting of fascism as the "bad guy". When, like all of history, there were many dangerous ideas going on at once. As Russia was not our enemy, communism and by extension Marxism was not taught as the social poison it is. If the enemy were Russia, and by extension communism, and Germany / Italy were our allies, our universities may well by now be infested with fascists by now instead.

I think it's because some people have trouble grasping nuance and their brains automatically go to "white nationalism" and thus "white supremacy" whenever they hear the word "nationalism". We are told the word is a racist dog whistle.

Though wouldn't only racists hear a racist dog whistle?

Originally posted by Surtur
I think it's because some people have trouble grasping nuance and their brains automatically go to "white nationalism" and thus "white supremacy" whenever they hear the word "nationalism". We are told the word is a racist dog whistle.

Though wouldn't only racists hear a racist dog whistle?

Most people have trouble grasping nuance, so even vague hints of nationalist rhetoric are conflated with racism — white supremacy — E V I L.

It's an idea conveniently banded around, much like the belief that cultural analysis is also synonymous with racism — white supremacy — E V I L!!!

Originally posted by Scribble
We've had two female prime ministers and they were both awful, like the majority of prime ministers. Just hope for a good president instead of one whose arbitrary identity seems aesthetically pleasing.

I just think a persons sex and sexuality should not factor into if someone votes for someone. People talk about putting party before country? That's putting agenda before country.

Like I don't think it's a wise idea to import tonnes of impoverished Muslims to my country to use as cheap labour, and even though I'm totally cool with taking in persecuted gays, women and anti-authoritarian dissidents from the same countries, I must be racist because... something? Idk. It's absurd. These people are fleeing from their countries for a reason, otherwise they'd be like... y'know, staying there because their cultures aren't shit?

Originally posted by Surtur
I just think a persons sex and sexuality should not factor into if someone votes for someone. People talk about putting party before country? That's putting agenda before country.
You're preaching to the choir, man. Clownworld.

Originally posted by Scribble
Most people have trouble grasping nuance, so even vague hints of nationalist rhetoric are conflated with racism — white supremacy — E V I L.

It's an idea conveniently banded around, much like the belief that cultural analysis is also synonymous with racism — white supremacy — E V I L!!!

I sometimes think the left doesn't wanna get rid of racism. After all, why constantly change the definition of racism unless you seek to preserve it?

Originally posted by Surtur
I sometimes think the left doesn't wanna get rid of racism. After all, why constantly change the definition of racism unless you seek to preserve it?
As "colourblindness" is now cancelled, intersectionality has no endgame. There is nothing to be won, really — it needs constant oppression to thrive as a concept. Thus yeah, they need racism to continue their agenda.

Much like how Greta's climate action is not actually about the climate — it's about a slow-poison Marxist agenda, even in her (parents/publicist)'s own words:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/climate-strikes-un-conference-madrid-by-greta-thunberg-et-al-2019-11?

"That action must be powerful and wide-ranging. After all, the climate crisis is not just about the environment. It is a crisis of human rights, of justice, and of political will. Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression have created and fueled it. We need to dismantle them all."

Tell me again how she's just a good kid doing her bit and not a political mouthpiece for insidious anti-liberal thought

This kind of shit is seeping in everywhere: authoritarian socialism in the guise of common-sense altruism.

The left hates the west and will do anything to destroy all we have carefully and sensibly built

Fascism was the threat 80 years ago. Now an ever-creeping cultural Marxism is our greatest politico-human existential threat.

The overall greatest existential threat is, of course, the constantly building of the world caliphate, AKA the literal scriptural end-goal of Islam. And somehow, funnily, the left is on that side, too. So, really, it's a terrifying double bill of constant cultural horror

Originally posted by Morning_Glory
Alexandria Cortez would be running for President if she was old enough

I doubt she'd be running so soon even if she was 5 years older. Her advisors would be telling her to gain more political experience.

Originally posted by Robtard
I doubt she'd be running so soon even if she was 5 years older. Her advisors would be telling her to gain more political experience.
Or telling her to fake-cry at the "border" and the many "concentration camps", AKA a random fence that anyone could walk around with nobody in the immediate vicinity other than her publicity crew

Left America keeps rattling on about Trump's lies and yet they sit on a throne of spin bullshit and hypocrisy

Originally posted by Scribble
As "colourblindness" is now cancelled, intersectionality has no endgame. There is nothing to be won, really — it needs constant oppression to thrive as a concept. Thus yeah, they need racism to continue their agenda.

Much like how Greta's climate action is not actually about the climate — it's about a slow-poison Marxist agenda, even in her (parents/publicist)'s own words:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/climate-strikes-un-conference-madrid-by-greta-thunberg-et-al-2019-11?

"That action must be powerful and wide-ranging. After all, the climate crisis is not just about the environment. It is a crisis of human rights, of justice, and of political will. Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression have created and fueled it. We need to dismantle them all."

Tell me again how she's just a good kid doing her bit and not a political mouthpiece for insidious anti-liberal thought

This kind of shit is seeping in everywhere: authoritarian socialism in the guise of common-sense altruism.

LOL so her mask finally slipped.

Oh and btw it gets even funnier. Last month she was gonna take a boat to a climate change summit in Madrid(she thinks any and all flying is wrong). It was actually a yacht, and one of the crew for the yacht had to fly from the US to Britain in order to be on the yacht. And the yacht had two diesel engines. This quote summed it up:

"The irony of protesting capitalism and oil on board a carbon-fiber (petrochemical) yacht owned by European royals who made billions operating Monaco as a tax haven was rich

Originally posted by Scribble
Left America keeps rattling on about Trump's lies and yet they sit on a throne of spin bullshit and hypocrisy