Originally posted by CharmanderI said Mjolnir absorbed it. Not Thor. The quote and the construction of my sentence should have made that clear.
It does change the thinking that he absorbed a blast that could have destroyed 1/5 of the universe though.
But, if in the alternative, you're mincing words between containing and absorbing, then feel free to do so. Even though mentioning Thor getting killed has nothing to do with changing terminology and was pointless. You can mince words, because in the end, the scope of the feat hasn't changed.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I said Mjolnir absorbed it. Not Thor. The quote and the construction of my sentence should have made that clear.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
you're mincing words
Anyway, no duh Mjolnir absorbed it. That shouldn't even be an issue on the forum anymore. You say Thor does it, it should be a given.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
But, if in the alternative, you're mincing words between containing and absorbing, then feel free to do so. Even though mentioning Thor getting killed has nothing to do with changing terminology and was pointless. You can mince words, because in the end, the scope of the feat hasn't changed.
One is absorbing, one is containing. 🙂
I felt like adding it in. Just like you felt like arguing about absolutely nothing.
Originally posted by CharmanderActually, I'm pretty sure you added that in for the purpose of arguing about absolutely nothing. But I won't begrudge your whims. You may be on your way now, as I will I.
Anyway, no duh Mjolnir absorbed it. That shouldn't even be an issue on the forum anymore. You say Thor does it, it should be a given.One is absorbing, one is containing. 🙂
I felt like adding it in. Just like you felt like arguing about absolutely nothing.