Orion VS Lobo

Orion- Current and fully equipped

VS

Lobo- Classic non retcon

Both are berserk, who wins?

Orion

Orion as well

stomp. Orion is current and fully equipped. If you dont know who Lobo was when he was first introduced then go do research cause he was made in the 80's and wasnt the guy he is today or the guy he was in the 90's.

Orion wins.

Originally posted by Indestructible
stomp. Orion is current and fully equipped. If you dont know who Lobo was when he was first introduced then go do research cause he was made in the 80's and wasnt the guy he is today or the guy he was in the 90's.

I know who Lobo is and probably have most of his appearances since The Omega Men debut.

The current Lobo is no longer capable of going toe to toe with Superman and Captain Marvel like he did in the past?

Orion has superior fighting skills

^ Lobo has superior ass-whuppin skills. He beats Orion like the red-headed stepchild he is.

Don't doubt the Main Man.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
The current Lobo is no longer capable of going toe to toe with Superman and Captain Marvel like he did in the past?

Lobo ftw.

If Lobo spams blood clones, Orion is going to have problems.

Then again, boomtube works great as BFR. Barring that or clones? The fight itself could take days to resolve.

^ Y'know... whatever happened to all these clones anyway:

They're hiding.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Y'know... whatever happened to all these clones anyway:

They killed themselves, so there can only be one, I think.

Orion wins, BTW. Lobo isn't the only one that has a healing factor.

Originally posted by cloud102
They killed themselves, so there can only be one, I think.

Orion wins, BTW. Lobo isn't the only one that has a healing factor.

When has Orion displayed the level of healing factor that he would need to stay competetive here?

The healing factor is what I think gives Lobo the edge.

Both are equally vicious, strong and fast.

We have seen Lobo kill Gods in a non kill zone section. Why would it be any different now?

I like the main man and all but I can't believe DC used Reign in Hell to retcon his weak showings.

Why can't these companies wait until they have a decent story to tell before wasting a good premise?

I liked Reign in Hell and all, but um...it wasn't like he was all that great in the arc. He wasted a bunch of no name demons with ease. Etrigan. Etc. The magicians he fought were just that - magicians. Not tanks like himself, so that really doesn't qualify IMO.

The impressive part was handling Zatanna, and Dr. Fate who are among the no name magicians.

Originally posted by id369
The impressive part was handling Zatanna, and Dr. Fate who are among the no name magicians.

But again, Bricks =/= Magicians.

Not really an accurate way to gauge his power.

Zatanna gave him hell in the first encounter. Then Lobo came in strait up pimp smacked her with his chain.

We have a round about idea, where he stands against tanks. Reign in Hell, simply serves to show how he stacks up to magic.