Originally posted by Vorpal Ruin
How would Sidious win by 'complete and utter pwnage'?
Indeed.
Not because I think he'd win, mind you, but because I know next to nothing about Durron's skills other than his reputation amongst the Jedi (which isn't good enough to suggest that he'd do well against someone of Palpatine's caliber).
Could someone provide an argument either way, please?
Originally posted by ares834
My mistake I was thinking DE Sidious at the time despite it saying RotS. Regardless, [B]Regardless, Sidious still wins as Kyp has done nothing at the calibur of RotS Sidious, exept when under Exar Kun's control. [/B]
Well Kyp did move that dovin basal.... and that's about it.
Originally posted by The Ground
Well duh... because to beat ROTS Sidious you have to be Mace or Yoda.
That means DE Sidious is too weak.
Originally posted by The Ground
You are an idiot. He CLEARLY states this. Regardless, DE Sidious is not Mace or Yoda.
I realize you're trying to be funny, but like the moron you poached that line from, you don't seem to realize that DE Sidious and RotS Sidious are, in fact... the same person. You'd think that the "Sidious" part would have given that little nugget of information away, but some people can't see the obvious.